Intel Arc A580 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison because the two cards occupy different positions in the database. The Intel Arc A580 has three benchmark entries, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has none. This makes a direct score-for-score comparison impossible. Instead, the database shows the A580 with an average benchmark score of 57756, placing it at the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The LX 7G100 has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, which reflects the absence of recorded test results rather than a literal performance of zero.

For the A580, the individual scores show a strong spread across test types. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it records 2229 points. In Geekbench OpenCL, it reaches 91657, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 79381. The nearest rival data for the A580 gives context: the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58085, which is 0.6% higher than the A580. The Intel Arc A570M averages 58239, 0.8% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE averages 57367, which is 0.7% lower than the A580. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT averages 58392, 1.1% higher. This places the A580 in a tight cluster where the difference between the best and worst rival is only about 1.9 percentage points.

Because the LX 7G100 has no benchmark entries, the database provides no head-to-head wins for either card. The winsA and winsB fields both show 0. The practical interpretation is that the A580 has a verified performance footprint, while the LX 7G100 does not yet have any recorded measurements to compare against. The A580’s percentile rank of 87 indicates it outperforms the large majority of GPUs in the database, based on its three test scores. The LX 7G100’s 50th percentile is a default placement, not a measured result.

Architecture Differences

The two cards use fundamentally different architectures. The Intel Arc A580 uses the DG2-512 chip based on the Xe-HPG architecture, belonging to the Alchemist generation, specifically the Arc 5 tier. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip based on an architecture called TrueGPU, belonging to the 7G100 generation. Both are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, so the manufacturing node is identical. The A580 has a transistor count of 21,700 million on a die size of 406 mm², giving a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². The LX 7G100’s transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, with no density figure.

The A580 features a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock recorded. Memory clocks differ as well: the A580 runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while the LX 7G100 runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The A580 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. So the A580 has a wider memory bus and higher bandwidth, while the LX 7G100 has more capacity but a narrower bus.

Shader configuration differs sharply. The A580 has 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The LX 7G100 has twice the shading units but the same TMU and ROP counts. The A580 includes 24 ray tracing cores; the LX 7G100 has no ray tracing core count listed. Neither card lists tensor cores. Pixel rates are identical at 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rates are identical at 384.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 12.29 TFLOPS for the A580 and 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX 7G100, meaning the LX 7G100 offers double the single-precision compute. FP16 throughput follows the same pattern: 24.58 TFLOPS for the A580 and 49.15 TFLOPS for the LX 7G100, both at a 2:1 ratio.

API support shows differences. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The A580 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. Power targets differ: the A580 has a TDP of 175 W and requires a 450 W suggested PSU, while the LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W and requires a 550 W suggested PSU. The A580 uses two 8-pin power connectors; the LX 7G100 uses a single 8-pin connector. Both are dual-slot cards and use PCIe 4.0 x16.

Display outputs differ. The A580 provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. The LX 7G100 provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Physical dimensions are recorded only for the LX 7G100: 294 mm in length (11.6 inches), 120 mm in height (4.7 inches), and 49 mm in width (1.9 inches). The A580 has no dimensions recorded. The A580’s predecessor is listed as Xe Graphics and its successor as Battlemage. The LX 7G100 has no predecessor or successor recorded.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the available data, the Intel Arc A580 wins in every category where a direct comparison is possible, because the LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark results. The A580’s average benchmark score of 57756 is a measured figure, while the LX 7G100’s average score of 0 is an empty placeholder. In the database, the A580 holds the 87th percentile, meaning it is ahead of most other GPUs. The LX 7G100’s 50th percentile is not a performance claim.

For use cases that rely on measured performance, the A580 is the only card with verified data. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 and Vulkan score of 79381 indicate strong compute throughput in those APIs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 shows a baseline for modern DX12 workloads. The LX 7G100 cannot be assigned any benchmark win because no tests exist.

Where the LX 7G100 might hold an advantage is in raw specifications. It has 12 GB of memory versus 8 GB, which matters for workloads that need larger frame buffers. It also has double the FP32 throughput at 24.58 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS, and double the shading units at 6144 versus 3072. These specs suggest the LX 7G100 has higher theoretical compute capacity, but the database contains no test scores to confirm whether that capacity translates into actual performance. The A580’s higher memory bandwidth at 512.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s could help in bandwidth-sensitive tasks, but again, only the A580 has measurement data.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher measured average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has an average benchmark score of 57756. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has an average benchmark score of 0, which reflects that no benchmark results are recorded in the database.

Q: How does the A580 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The A580 is 0.6% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, 0.8% slower than the Intel Arc A570M, 0.7% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, and 1.1% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, based on average scores.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The A580 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has higher compute throughput?

A: The LX 7G100 has 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16. The A580 has 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS FP16. The LX 7G100 doubles the A580’s FP32 figure and doubles the FP16 figure.

Q: Do both cards support the same API versions?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The A580 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The A580 has a TDP of 175 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W, using two 8-pin connectors. The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W, using one 8-pin connector.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two cards:

• Chip: DG2-512 for the A580, 7G106 for the LX 7G100
• Architecture: Xe-HPG for the A580, TrueGPU for the LX 7G100
• Generation: Alchemist (Arc 5) for the A580, 7G100 for the LX 7G100
• Transistors: 21,700 million for the A580, unknown for the LX 7G100
• Die Size: 406 mm² for the A580, unknown for the LX 7G100
• Transistor Density: 53.4M / mm² for the A580, null for the LX 7G100
• Base Clock: 1700 MHz for the A580, null for the LX 7G100
• Boost Clock: 2000 MHz for the A580, null for the LX 7G100
• Memory Clock: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) for the A580, 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX 7G100
• Memory Size: 8 GB for the A580, 12 GB for the LX 7G100
• Memory Bus Width: 256 bit for the A580, 192 bit for the LX 7G100
• Memory Bandwidth: 512.0 GB/s for the A580, 432.0 GB/s for the LX 7G100
• Shading Units: 3072 for the A580, 6144 for the LX 7G100
• RT Cores: 24 for the A580, null for the LX 7G100
• FP32: 12.29 TFLOPS for the A580, 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX 7G100
• FP16: 24.58 TFLOPS for the A580, 49.15 TFLOPS for the LX 7G100
• TDP: 175 W for the A580, 225 W for the LX 7G100
• Power Connectors: 2x 8-pin for the A580, 1x 8-pin for the LX 7G100
• Suggested PSU: 450 W for the A580, 550 W for the LX 7G100
• Display Outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 for the A580, 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for the LX 7G100
• Vulkan Version: 1.4 for the A580, 1.3 for the LX 7G100
• Dimensions: not recorded for the A580; 294 mm length, 120 mm height, 49 mm width for the LX 7G100
• Release Date: 2023-10-09 for the A580, 2026-06-17 for the LX 7G100
• Predecessor: Xe Graphics for the A580, null for the LX 7G100
• Successor: Battlemage for the A580, null for the LX 7G100

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split. For anyone choosing a card with verified performance, the Intel Arc A580 is the only option with recorded measurements. Its average benchmark score of 57756 places it at the 87th percentile, with a tight grouping around rivals like the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM and the Intel Arc A570M, both within 0.8% of its score. The A580 also offers ray tracing cores, a wider 256-bit memory bus, higher bandwidth at 512.0 GB/s, and support for Vulkan 1.4.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 presents a different profile from raw specifications. It has 12 GB of memory versus 8 GB, double the shading units at 6144, double the FP32 throughput at 24.58 TFLOPS, and a higher memory clock at 18 Gbps effective. Those specifications point to higher theoretical compute capacity. However, the database contains no benchmark scores for the LX 7G100, no average score, and no rival comparisons. Its 50th percentile is a default value, not a measured outcome.

A builder prioritizing tested, database-verified performance should select the A580. A builder who values memory capacity and raw compute specifications, and who is willing to accept the absence of benchmark data, might consider the LX 7G100. The A580 also uses less power at 175 W versus 225 W and requires a smaller PSU at 450 W versus 550 W. The LX 7G100 needs one 8-pin connector, while the A580 needs two. The LX 7G100 is the physically larger card at 294 mm in length, so case clearance becomes a factor. The A580 is the safer choice based on the recorded data; the LX 7G100 remains an unverified specification sheet.