Intel Arc A550M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and Intel Arc A550M sit at opposite ends of the GPU spectrum—one is a 300 W desktop flagship aimed at enthusiasts, the other a 60 W mobile part designed for thin laptops. Despite this, their average benchmark scores are remarkably close: the RTX 5070 Ti averages 49957, while the Arc A550M averages 49737, a difference of just 0.4%. That proximity, however, masks a chasm in raw compute, memory bandwidth, and architectural intent. The data below breaks down exactly where each part wins, loses, and why.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only two benchmarks shared between these GPUs are Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti dominates both. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 212363 against the Arc A550M’s 49894, a delta of 325.6%. That is not a marginal lead—it is a four-fold plus advantage. In Geekbench Vulkan, the gap widens further: the RTX 5070 Ti posts 225122 versus 49580, a 354.1% delta. These are not close contests; the NVIDIA part outclasses the Intel part by over 3x in every shared metric.

Looking at the broader benchmark landscape, the RTX 5070 Ti has a full suite of PassMark tests and 3DMark Steel Nomad results, while the Arc A550M only has the two Geekbench entries. The RTX 5070 Ti’s PassMark G3D score is 32974, and its GPU Compute score is 20203. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result is 6604. None of these have a direct Arc A550M counterpart in the data, so direct comparison is limited to the Geekbench pair. Still, the pattern is clear: in every head-to-head test available, the RTX 5070 Ti wins, and wins by a landslide.

The nearest rival data reinforces this split. The RTX 5070 Ti’s closest competitor by average score is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, which sits at 50001, a delta of -0.1%. The Arc A550M, meanwhile, is virtually tied with the RTX 5070 Ti in average score (49737 vs 49957, delta 0.4%), but that tie is an artifact of averaging across different test sets. When both parts take the same tests, the NVIDIA card pulls ahead by 325% to 354%. The Arc A550M’s average is buoyed by its Geekbench results, which are strong for a mobile GPU, but they do not scale to the RTX 5070 Ti’s desktop-class performance.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti wins in every measurable head-to-head category. It has 8960 shading units versus 2048, 280 TMUs versus 128, and 96 ROPs versus 64. Its FP32 compute is 43.94 TFLOPS, which is over five times the Arc A550M’s 8.397 TFLOPS. Memory bandwidth is 896.0 GB/s against 224.0 GB/s, and the NVIDIA card carries 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, while the Intel part has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. In ray tracing, the RTX 5070 Ti has 70 RT cores; the Arc A550M has 16. There is no test in the FACT PACK where the Arc A550M comes out ahead.

That said, the Arc A550M has its own niche. Its 60 W TDP and IGP slot width mean it is designed for portable devices, not desktop towers. Its 6 nm process node (TSMC) is newer than the RTX 5070 Ti’s 5 nm node in process generation, but that does not translate to performance. The Arc A550M’s FP16 throughput is 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), which is higher than its FP32 rate—a sign it can handle certain compute workloads efficiently, but those workloads are not represented in the shared benchmarks. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 is respectable for a mobile part, but it is less than a quarter of the RTX 5070 Ti’s 212363.

Where the Arc A550M genuinely “wins” is in power envelope and form factor. It requires no power connectors, has no suggested PSU, and is listed as end-of-life, meaning it targets a different market segment entirely—integrated-class performance for laptops. The RTX 5070 Ti, by contrast, demands a 700 W suggested PSU and a 16-pin connector, making it unsuitable for any portable chassis.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is built on the GB203 chip using Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. It packs 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². The Intel Arc A550M uses the DG2-512 chip with Xe-HPG architecture, also from TSMC but on a 6 nm node. It contains 21,700 million transistors spread across a larger 406 mm² die, giving a much lower density of 53.4M per mm². The NVIDIA chip is smaller and denser, which aligns with its higher clock speeds: base 2295 MHz and boost 2452 MHz, versus the Arc’s 900 MHz base and 2050 MHz boost.

Memory architecture diverges sharply. The RTX 5070 Ti uses GDDR7 at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) on a 256-bit bus, achieving 896.0 GB/s. The Arc A550M uses GDDR6 at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) on a 128-bit bus, capping at 224.0 GB/s. That is a four-fold bandwidth difference. The NVIDIA card also has 280 tensor cores; the Intel part lists none. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical.

The RTX 5070 Ti’s pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s and texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s. The Arc A550M’s pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. These are not close—the NVIDIA card is roughly 1.8x faster in pixel fill and 2.6x faster in texture fill. The RTX 5070 Ti also uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Arc A550M uses PCIe 4.0 x16, a generational gap in bus bandwidth. Display outputs differ too: the RTX 5070 Ti has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, whereas the Arc A550M’s outputs are listed as “Portable Device Dependent,” reflecting its mobile nature.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5070 Ti in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti scores 212363, while the Arc A550M scores 49894, making the NVIDIA card 325.6% faster in this test.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 49957, and the Arc A550M averages 49737. That is a delta of 0.4%, meaning the NVIDIA card is statistically nearly identical in average, but that average is skewed by different test sets.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus. The Arc A550M has 224.0 GB/s from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Can the Arc A550M handle ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 16 RT cores, but the RTX 5070 Ti has 70 RT cores, so ray tracing performance is not comparable.

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has a TDP of 300 W and requires a 700 W suggested PSU. The Arc A550M has a TDP of 60 W and no suggested PSU listed.

Q: Are both GPUs in production?

A: No. The RTX 5070 Ti is listed as Active, while the Arc A550M is End-of-life.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the superior GPU in every benchmark shared with the Intel Arc A550M. It wins both Geekbench tests by over 325%, has more than four times the memory bandwidth, over five times the FP32 throughput, and nearly five times the shading units. Its 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs matches the Arc A550M’s percentile, but that percentile is achieved with far more headroom—the RTX 5070 Ti’s avgBenchmarkScore of 49957 comes from a diverse test suite including 3DMark and PassMark, while the Arc A550M’s 49737 is based solely on two Geekbench runs.

Who should pick the RTX 5070 Ti? Anyone building a desktop with a 700 W PSU and a dual-slot PCIe 5.0 slot, seeking maximum compute and gaming performance. It is an active product with a launch MSRP of 749 USD, and its nearest rivals—RX Vega 64, RX 6900 XT, RX 6800 XT—are all within 3.1% of its average score, making it competitive in its class. Who should pick the Arc A550M? Only those constrained to a 60 W mobile form factor, where its IGP slot and lack of power connectors are assets. It is end-of-life, has no release date, and offers no path to upgrade. If you need a GPU for a laptop, the Arc A550M is a functional option. If you need performance, the RTX 5070 Ti is the only choice in this comparison.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | Intel Arc A550M |

|---------------|---------------------------|-----------------|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Xe-HPG |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 45,600 million | 21,700 million |

| Die Size | 378 mm² | 406 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 120.6M / mm² | 53.4M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 2295 MHz | 900 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2452 MHz | 2050 MHz |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 896.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 8960 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 280 | 128 |

| ROPs | 96 | 64 |

| RT Cores | 70 | 16 |

| Tensor Cores | 280 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 235.4 GPixel/s | 131.2 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 686.6 GTexel/s | 262.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 43.94 TFLOPS | 8.397 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) | 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 300 W | 60 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | null |

| Suggested PSU | 700 W | null |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | Portable Device Dependent |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-02-19 | null |

| Launch MSRP | 749 USD | null |