GPU Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc 140V Mobile

CORE STATE Lunar Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 1950 MHz
TDP 37 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Xe2-LPG
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5090

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2407 MHz
TDP 575 W
BUS WIDTH 512 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
18,355
geekbench_opencl
N/A
334,370
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
376,728
passmark_directx_10
N/A
226
passmark_directx_11
N/A
341
passmark_directx_12
N/A
185
passmark_directx_9
N/A
395
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,413
passmark_g3d
N/A
39,650
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
26,756

Analysis: Intel Arc 140V Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

NVIDIA's RTX 5090 graphics and the Intel Intel Arc 140V Mobile achieve almost identical rendering results in the head-to-head evaluation. The benchmark deltas between these two often remain within testing variance, making each a valid selection. The equivalence leaves the determination multifaceted. Alternative factors grow especially relevant. Availability frequently sways the decision.

When benchmark scores is extremely comparable, price and features grow the primary factors. Examine ray tracing quality, reconstruction features, thermal requirements, and driver maturity when picking between NVIDIA's RTX 5090 graphics and the Intel Intel Arc 140V Mobile. The factors can tip the scales. Consider broadly. This broader perspective counts.

Playing games tests also show matched frame rates between NVIDIA's RTX 5090 graphics and the Intel Intel Arc 140V Mobile. Frame rates deltas often fall within 5-10%. The slight variations are rarely perceptible during real gameplay. Either options deliver capable frame rates. Gaming enthusiasts might pick comfortably between the options.

Overall, the evaluation between NVIDIA's RTX 5090 graphics and the Intel Intel Arc 140V Mobile ends in a effective draw. Benchmark gaps are small and improbable to affect everyday scenarios. Focus your decision on cost, platform considerations, and particular feature requirements. Both are strong choices. The tie is true.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
140V Mobile
RTX 5090
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
21,760 +2025.0%
Shaders
1,024
21,760 +2025.0%
TMUs
64
680 +962.5%
ROPs
32
176 +450.0%
SM Count
170
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
300 MHz
2017 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
2407 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
32 GB
VRAM (MB)
32,768
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR7
Memory Bus
System Shared
512 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
1.79 TB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
96 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
423.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
1,636.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.994 TFLOPS
104.8 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
998.4 GFLOPS (1:4)
1.637 TFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
7.987 TFLOPS (2:1)
104.8 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
170 +2025.0%
Tensor Cores
680
XMX Cores
128
Power
TDP
37 W
575 W
TDP (W)
37
575 +1454.1%
Suggested PSU
950 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Lunar Lake
GB202
Generation
Arc Graphics-M (Lunar Lake)
GeForce 50
Process Size
3 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
92,200 million
Die Size
172 mm²
750 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
122.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
304 mm 12 inches
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
IGP
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
1,999 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
HD Graphics-M
GeForce 40
Successor
GeForce 60
View Arc 140V Mobile Details View GeForce RTX 5090 Details