Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc 140T Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 occupy entirely different segments of the graphics market. The recorded data positions the Intel part as an integrated graphics processor for portable devices, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a discrete, dual-slot add-in board with its own dedicated memory. Their performance profiles do not overlap in any meaningful way, and the database shows no direct benchmark comparisons between the two.

The Intel Arc 140T Mobile wins in the category of system integration and power efficiency. It is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC and carries a 35 W TDP, which suits thin-and-light portable designs. It uses system shared memory, meaning it draws from the host system's RAM rather than requiring dedicated VRAM. This makes it a natural fit for notebooks where space and thermal budget are constrained. Its 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units deliver a pixel rate of 75.20 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 150.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput sits at 4.813 TFLOPS. These figures place it in the entry-level tier for integrated graphics.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins decisively in raw compute and memory bandwidth. It features 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, which are six times the shading units and triple the ROPs of the Intel part. Its FP32 performance is 24.58 TFLOPS, roughly five times higher than the Intel Arc 140T Mobile. The pixel rate reaches 192.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. It is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part has no dedicated memory bandwidth figure, as its bandwidth is system dependent. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 draws 225 W and requires a 550 W suggested power supply, reflecting its performance-oriented design.

The use-case split is clear. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile is for portable devices where power draw and physical footprint matter more than peak throughput. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is for desktop systems that can accommodate a 294 mm dual-slot card, four DisplayPort outputs, and a 225 W power draw. The data indicates no scenario where these two products compete for the same buyer.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers, use different process nodes, and implement different architectural concepts. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile is based on the Xe-LPG+ architecture and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) generation. It uses the Arrow Lake-H chip and is fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation, built on the 7G106 chip, also at TSMC but on a 6 nm process.

The Intel part integrates 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. It also includes 8 ray tracing cores, giving it hardware-accelerated ray tracing support. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no listed ray tracing cores, so its ray tracing capabilities are not documented in the database. The Intel part lists a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2350 MHz. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock figures recorded.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory clocked at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed on a 192-bit bus, producing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This dedicated memory arrangement is a major architectural distinction, as it removes the dependency on host system memory performance.

The process difference is small but notable. The Intel part uses 5 nm, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses 6 nm, both at TSMC. The Intel part is one process generation ahead, which helps it achieve its 35 W TDP despite being an integrated solution. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 operates at a 225 W TDP, a 190 W difference that reflects its discrete, performance-focused design.

API support is similar. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. The Intel part is one Vulkan version ahead.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card measuring 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface and a single 8-pin power connector. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile is an integrated graphics processor with an IGP bus interface, no power connectors, and no dimensions recorded. Its display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, whereas the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between these two GPUs. The winsA and winsB fields both record zero, and the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty. However, the specification data allows for direct comparisons of theoretical peak performance.

The most significant gap is in FP32 compute. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, while the Intel Arc 140T Mobile delivers 4.813 TFLOPS. This is a 5.1x advantage for the Lisuan Tech part. In FP16 compute, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 reaches 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1), compared to 9.626 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Intel Arc 140T Mobile, a similar ratio.

Pixel throughput favors the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 75.20 GPixel/s for the Intel part, a 2.55x advantage. Texture throughput shows an even larger gap: 384.0 GTexel/s versus 150.4 GTexel/s, a 2.55x advantage as well.

Memory bandwidth is where the difference becomes extreme. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a fixed 432.0 GB/s from its GDDR6 memory. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile has no fixed bandwidth figure, as its memory bandwidth is system dependent. In a best-case scenario with high-speed system RAM, the Intel part could narrow the gap, but the recorded data does not provide a number to support that comparison.

The shading unit count difference is substantial. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units versus 1024 for the Intel Arc 140T Mobile, a 6x advantage. TMU counts are 192 versus 64, a 3x advantage. ROP counts are 96 versus 32, also a 3x advantage.

The Intel Arc 140T Mobile does lead in one area: it has 8 ray tracing cores, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 lists none. The database records no ray tracing performance figures for either part, so the practical impact of this architectural difference cannot be quantified from the available data.

Both GPUs are listed at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of zero for each. The absence of benchmark entries means these percentile values carry no comparative weight; they simply reflect the default database state for unmeasured parts.

The Verdict

The data points to two completely different products with no competitive overlap. The Intel Arc 140T Mobile is an integrated GPU for portable devices, built on a 5 nm process with a 35 W TDP, system shared memory, and 8 ray tracing cores. Its recorded performance figures, 4.813 TFLOPS FP32 and 75.20 GPixel/s pixel rate, are appropriate for an integrated solution in a mobile context.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a discrete desktop GPU with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. Its 225 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, 294 mm length, and 550 W suggested power supply mark it as a high-performance desktop component. It has no ray tracing cores listed, which is a notable omission compared to the Intel part.

Buyers of the Intel Arc 140T Mobile are those using portable devices that need integrated graphics with modern API support, including DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4. Buyers of the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 are those building desktop systems with a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, a 550 W power supply, and a need for high FP32 throughput and dedicated memory bandwidth.

The Intel part is one process node ahead at 5 nm versus 6 nm, and it supports a newer Vulkan version. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 dominates in every compute and memory metric recorded. There is no data suggesting the Intel Arc 140T Mobile can match the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 in raw performance, nor is there data suggesting the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 can function in a portable, integrated context.

Neither product has an advantage in price, as no launch MSRP is recorded for either. The choice between them is determined entirely by the target system form factor and performance requirements, both clearly delineated in the specification data.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, compared to 4.813 TFLOPS for the Intel Arc 140T Mobile.

Q: Does the Intel Arc 140T Mobile support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc 140T Mobile includes 8 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 lists no ray tracing cores in the database.

Q: What memory does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 use?

A: It uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, clocked at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the power requirement for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc 140T Mobile has a 35 W TDP. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP and a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU supports a newer Vulkan version?

A: The Intel Arc 140T Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What is the physical form factor of the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100?

A: It is a dual-slot card measuring 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width, with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and one 8-pin power connector.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc 140T Mobile | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe-LPG+ | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) | 7G100 |

| Chip | Arrow Lake-H | 7G106 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | None recorded |

| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz | None recorded |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1024 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 64 | 192 |

| ROPs | 32 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | None recorded |

| Pixel Rate | 75.20 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 150.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 4.813 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 9.626 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 35 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None recorded | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | Not recorded | 294 mm x 120 mm x 49 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2026-06-17 |

| Production Status | Active | Active |