Intel Arc 130V Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Intel Arc 130V Mobile is an integrated graphics processor built on Intel’s Lunar Lake chip, using the Xe2-LPG architecture and a 3 nm TSMC process. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a discrete dual-slot card based on the GB203 chip, Blackwell 2.0 architecture, and a 5 nm TSMC process. The two products occupy different segments entirely, with the Arc 130V Mobile designed for portable devices and the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER aimed at high-end desktop systems.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two products. The only recorded benchmark for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it scored 6269.5. The Arc 130V Mobile has no benchmark scores listed in the database, and its average benchmark score is zero, with a percentile ranking of 50 against all GPUs. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile among all GPUs, which places it below the midpoint of the recorded performance distribution despite its high absolute score.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s nearest rivals in the database are NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 with an average score of 6270 and a delta of 0 percent, NVIDIA Quadro K620 at 6282 with a delta of -0.2 percent, AMD FirePro W600 at 6223 with a delta of 0.8 percent, and AMD Radeon R7 M350 at 6327 with a delta of -0.9 percent. These deltas indicate that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER performs nearly identically to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 in the Steel Nomad test, while trailing the Quadro K620 and Radeon R7 M350 by fractions of a percent and slightly exceeding the FirePro W600. The close margins, all within 1 percent, suggest that the Steel Nomad workload is not particularly sensitive to the architectural differences among these cards. For the Arc 130V Mobile, no comparable data exists, so any performance inference must rely entirely on its specifications and TDP.

In raw compute metrics, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance, while the Arc 130V Mobile provides 3.315 TFLOPS FP32. That is a 13.25-fold difference in floating-point throughput. Pixel rate for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is 235.4 GPixel/s versus 51.80 GPixel/s for the Arc 130V Mobile, a 4.5-fold gap. Texture rate stands at 686.6 GTexel/s for the NVIDIA part and 103.6 GTexel/s for the Intel part, a 6.6-fold difference. Memory bandwidth is 896.0 GB/s for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, while the Arc 130V Mobile uses shared system memory with bandwidth described as system dependent, so no direct comparison is possible.

FAQ

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scored 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, has an average score of 6270, resulting in a delta of 0 percent. The Quadro K620 scores 6282 (delta -0.2 percent), the AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223 (delta 0.8 percent), and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327 (delta -0.9 percent). All deltas are within 1 percent, meaning these cards perform effectively the same in this test.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each product?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc 130V Mobile uses system shared memory, with no dedicated VRAM, a shared bus width, and bandwidth that depends on the host system.

Q: Which product has higher clock speeds?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The Arc 130V Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1850 MHz, with memory speed listed as system shared.

Q: What are the physical dimensions of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. It is a dual-slot card with a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and a single 16-pin power connector. The Arc 130V Mobile is an integrated graphics processor with an IGP slot width and no separate dimensions listed.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W. The Arc 130V Mobile has a TDP of 37 W. The Intel part consumes roughly 10.6 times less power than the NVIDIA part.

Q: Which product has more shading units and ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 96 ROPs, 70 ray tracing cores, and 280 tensor cores. The Arc 130V Mobile has 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, 28 ROPs, and 7 ray tracing cores, with no tensor cores listed.

Architecture Differences

The two products use different fabrication processes. The Arc 130V Mobile uses a 3 nm process at TSMC, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses a 5 nm process, also from TSMC. The Intel chip, named Lunar Lake, has a die size of 172 mm², whereas the NVIDIA GB203 die measures 378 mm². Transistor counts are not disclosed for the Arc 130V Mobile, but the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER contains 45,600 million transistors, yielding a density of 120.6 million per square millimeter.

Architecturally, the Arc 130V Mobile employs Intel’s Xe2-LPG architecture, which is part of the Arc Graphics-M generation built for mobile and integrated use. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture within the GeForce 50 series. The NVIDIA part includes tensor cores, which the Intel part does not list. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 280 tensor cores, while the Arc 130V Mobile has none recorded.

Memory architecture is a fundamental divergence. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has dedicated GDDR7 memory with a fixed 256-bit bus and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc 130V Mobile relies on system shared memory for both capacity and bus width, with bandwidth dependent on the host device’s memory configuration. This means the Intel part’s memory performance is not fixed, while the NVIDIA card has a deterministic memory subsystem.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz, with memory at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The Arc 130V Mobile runs at a 300 MHz base and 1850 MHz boost, with memory clock listed as system shared. The NVIDIA card’s boost clock is 602 MHz higher than the Intel part’s boost.

Physical integration differs completely. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot discrete card with a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, a 304 mm length, 137 mm height, 48 mm width, and a single 16-pin power connector. The Arc 130V Mobile is an IGP with no slot width beyond integrated, no power connectors, and a portable device dependent display output configuration. The NVIDIA card supports 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, while the Intel part’s outputs depend on the laptop or handheld device.

The Verdict

The data shows that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the far more capable graphics processor in absolute terms. Its FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS, pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s, and texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s dwarf the Arc 130V Mobile’s 3.315 TFLOPS, 51.80 GPixel/s, and 103.6 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA card also offers 16 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is not comparable to shared system memory. Anyone seeking maximum graphics performance from the recorded specifications should select the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER.

However, the Arc 130V Mobile has its own advantages. Its TDP of 37 W is dramatically lower than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 350 W. The Intel part is an integrated solution, meaning it requires no separate power connector, no PCIe slot, and no cooling solution beyond what the host device provides. Its 3 nm process node is also smaller than the 5 nm node of the NVIDIA chip. For portable devices where power consumption and physical space are constrained, the Arc 130V Mobile is the only viable option among these two, since the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER cannot be installed in such a form factor.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s benchmark percentile of 36 against all GPUs, despite a strong absolute score, indicates that the database contains many higher-performing graphics cards. The Arc 130V Mobile’s 50th percentile with no benchmark scores means its relative standing is unverified. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s nearest rivals all score within 0.9 percent of it, confirming that the Steel Nomad test shows parity with several other NVIDIA and AMD products. No such comparison exists for the Arc 130V Mobile.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two products:

• Manufacturer: Intel versus NVIDIA
• Chip: Lunar Lake versus GB203
• Architecture: Xe2-LPG versus Blackwell 2.0
• Process node: 3 nm versus 5 nm
• Die size: 172 mm² versus 378 mm²
• Transistors: unknown versus 45,600 million
• Transistor density: not listed versus 120.6M / mm²
• Base clock: 300 MHz versus 2295 MHz
• Boost clock: 1850 MHz versus 2452 MHz
• Memory clock: System Shared versus 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective)
• Memory size: System Shared versus 16 GB
• Memory type: System Shared versus GDDR7
• Memory bus width: System Shared versus 256 bit
• Memory bandwidth: System Dependent versus 896.0 GB/s
• Shading units: 896 versus 8960
• Texture mapping units: 56 versus 280
• ROP count: 28 versus 96
• Ray tracing cores: 7 versus 70
• Tensor cores: not listed versus 280
• Pixel rate: 51.80 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 103.6 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s
• FP32 performance: 3.315 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS
• FP16 performance: 6.630 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
• TDP: 37 W versus 350 W
• Slot width: IGP versus Dual-slot
• Power connectors: none versus 1x 16-pin
• Bus interface: IGP versus PCIe 5.0 x16
• Display outputs: Portable Device Dependent versus 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
• Dimensions: not listed versus 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm
• Release date: 2024-09-23 versus 2025-12-31
• Predecessor: HD Graphics-M versus none
• Launch MSRP: not listed versus 749 USD (stated once)

Both products share the same DirectX version (12 Ultimate 12_2), OpenGL version (4.6), and Vulkan version (1.4). Both are marked as Active in production status.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in every recorded compute metric. Its FP32 output is 13.25 times higher than the Arc 130V Mobile. Its texture rate is 6.6 times higher, and its pixel rate is 4.5 times higher. The NVIDIA card has exactly 10 times the shading units (8960 versus 896), 5 times the TMUs (280 versus 56), 10 times the ray tracing cores (70 versus 7), and roughly 3.4 times the ROPs (96 versus 28). It also has dedicated memory with a fixed bandwidth, which the Intel part lacks. For gaming, rendering, compute workloads, or any task requiring high throughput, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the clear choice from the recorded data.

The Arc 130V Mobile wins in power efficiency and integration. Its 37 W TDP is 313 W lower than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 350 W. It requires no external power connector, no expansion slot, and no discrete cooling apparatus. Its display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning it can drive the built-in screens of laptops and handhelds directly. The 3 nm process node is also a smaller geometry than the 5 nm node used by the NVIDIA chip. For ultra-portable devices where power draw and physical footprint are the primary constraints, the Arc 130V Mobile is the appropriate choice. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 304 mm length and dual-slot width cannot fit into such systems.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s launch MSRP of 749 USD is recorded in the database, while the Arc 130V Mobile has no listed launch price. The NVIDIA card’s release date of 2025-12-31 puts it later than the Arc 130V Mobile’s 2024-09-23 release. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has no predecessor listed, while the Arc 130V Mobile succeeds the HD Graphics-M. Neither product has a listed successor.