Intel Arc 130T Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc 130T Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Both entries show empty benchmark arrays, zero average benchmark scores, and zero wins in the head-to-head comparison. This absence of direct measurements makes a conventional performance comparison impossible from the available data. What can be analyzed are the theoretical compute ceilings derived from each chip's architectural specifications.

The raw throughput figures show a massive gap. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc 130T Mobile delivers 3.942 TFLOPS. That places the LX PRO at approximately 6.2 times the FP32 throughput of the Arc 130T, a difference derived directly from the recorded numbers. Pixel throughput follows a similar pattern: the LX PRO reaches 192.0 GPixel/s against 61.60 GPixel/s for the Arc 130T, a 3.1 times advantage. Texture fill rates show 384.0 GTexel/s versus 123.2 GTexel/s, again a 3.1 times margin. These are not benchmark scores, but they represent the theoretical limits each GPU can sustain under ideal conditions.

The FP16 figures reinforce the disparity. The LX PRO records 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) while the Arc 130T reaches 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1), a 6.2 times advantage identical to the FP32 ratio. The consistency of these ratios suggests the LX PRO scales its compute resources uniformly, while the Arc 130T operates at a fundamentally smaller scale across all pipeline stages.

Neither part has recorded benchmark scores, so no percentile shift can be reported. Both sit at the 50th percentile against all GPUs in the database, but that percentile is based on empty benchmark data and should not be interpreted as evidence of equal real-world performance. The specification-derived deltas are the only measurable comparisons available.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded specifications, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in every category where a direct numeric comparison exists. It holds advantages in shading units (6144 versus 896), texture mapping units (192 versus 56), and render output units (96 versus 28). It also leads in memory capacity (24 GB versus system shared), memory type (GDDR6 versus system shared), bus width (192 bit versus system shared), and memory bandwidth (432.0 GB/s versus system dependent). The LX PRO further leads in pixel rate, texture rate, FP32 throughput, FP16 throughput, and power delivery requirements with a 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU.

The Intel Arc 130T Mobile wins in portability and integration. It carries a 35 W TDP, uses an IGP slot width, and connects through an IGP bus interface. It does not require a power connector, where the LX PRO needs a 1x 16-pin connector. Display outputs on the Arc are portable device dependent, meaning the host device determines connectivity, while the LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs directly. The Arc also supports Vulkan 1.4, one version ahead of the LX PRO's Vulkan 1.3 support.

The use-case split follows from these figures. Systems constrained by power envelopes below 35 W would necessarily rely on the Arc 130T's integrated design. Systems requiring dedicated memory bandwidth, high compute throughput, and multi-display output would rely on the LX PRO. The Arc 130T uses system shared memory, which means its bandwidth and capacity fluctuate with the host platform's memory configuration. The LX PRO's dedicated 24 GB GDDR6 pool provides deterministic memory behavior at 432.0 GB/s.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different design lineages. The Intel Arc 130T Mobile uses the Xe-LPG+ architecture built on a 5 nm TSMC process, part of the Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) generation and derived from the Arrow Lake-H chip. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a TrueGPU architecture built on a 6 nm TSMC process, part of the 7G100 generation with the 7G105 chip. Both use TSMC as foundry, but the Arc 130T's 5 nm node gives it a density advantage on paper. However, transistor counts and die sizes are listed as unknown for both, so no direct density comparison is possible.

The shading complex differs substantially. The Arc 130T packs 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, 28 ROPs, and 7 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO packs 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. The LX PRO's shader count is 6.9 times higher, its TMU count 3.4 times higher, and its ROP count 3.4 times higher. The Arc 130T's 7 RT cores give it hardware ray tracing capability that the LX PRO does not list.

Memory architecture could not diverge further. The Arc 130T uses system shared memory of system shared type with a system shared bus width and system dependent bandwidth. Its memory clock is also system shared. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with a 2250 MHz memory clock (18 Gbps effective) and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO's dedicated memory subsystem removes dependence on host memory performance.

Clock behavior also differs. The Arc 130T records a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The LX PRO records no base or boost clock for the core, only the memory clock. This makes direct clock-to-clock comparisons impossible, but the compute throughput figures already account for clock differences.

API support shows minor divergence. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc 130T supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The Arc 130T's newer Vulkan version may enable additional features in Vulkan-based workloads, though the database does not specify which features differ between versions.

Physical specifications differ sharply. The LX PRO is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The Arc 130T is an IGP with no listed dimensions, no slot width beyond IGP, and no power connectors. The LX PRO requires a 550 W suggested PSU and a 1x 16-pin power connector. The Arc 130T runs on the host device's power delivery at 35 W.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO records 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, approximately 6.2 times the Intel Arc 130T Mobile's 3.942 TFLOPS.

Q: Does the Intel Arc 130T Mobile support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc 130T lists 7 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO does not list any ray tracing cores in the database.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The Arc 130T uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and an 18 Gbps effective memory clock.

Q: Which GPU requires an external power connector?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO requires a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU. The Intel Arc 130T Mobile lists no power connectors and runs at 35 W TDP as an IGP.

Q: How do the pixel and texture rates compare?

A: The LX PRO reaches 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The Arc 130T reaches 61.60 GPixel/s and 123.2 GTexel/s. The LX PRO holds a 3.1 times advantage in both metrics.

Q: What are the API differences between the two?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc 130T supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc 130T Mobile | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe-LPG+ | TrueGPU |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Generation | Arc Graphics-M (Arrow Lake) | 7G100 |

| Chip | Arrow Lake-H | 7G105 |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | Not listed |

| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz | Not listed |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 896 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 56 | 192 |

| ROPs | 28 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 7 | Not listed |

| Pixel Rate | 61.60 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 3.942 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 35 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | Not listed | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2026-03-16 |

The Verdict

The recorded data separates these two GPUs into distinct categories. The Intel Arc 130T Mobile is an integrated processor designed for a 35 W power envelope, with shared system memory, no dedicated video memory, and a compact IGP form factor. Its compute capabilities are modest: 3.942 TFLOPS FP32, 61.60 GPixel/s, and 123.2 GTexel/s. It includes 7 ray tracing cores and Vulkan 1.4 support, which may matter for specific rendering workloads.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a dedicated expansion card with 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus, 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. It requires a 225 W TDP, a 1x 16-pin power connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, and a dual-slot chassis space. It provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and measures 248 mm in length.

The data indicates the LX PRO is the stronger compute device by every recorded performance metric. Its shading unit count is 6.9 times higher, its FP32 throughput 6.2 times higher, and its memory bandwidth is a dedicated 432.0 GB/s versus a system dependent figure for the Arc. The Arc 130T's advantages are limited to integration efficiency, a lower TDP, ray tracing cores, and a newer Vulkan version.

A system builder constrained to a 35 W integrated solution would select the Arc 130T Mobile. A system builder requiring maximum recorded compute throughput, dedicated memory, and direct display outputs would select the LX PRO. The absence of benchmark scores means these conclusions rest entirely on specification-derived deltas, but those deltas are unambiguous in direction and magnitude.