AMD Steam Machine GPU vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Comparison
AMD Steam Machine GPU
GeForce RTX 5060
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Steam Machine GPU vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060
The Verdict
The database presents two very different products. The AMD Steam Machine GPU is a console-oriented part with a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 sits at the 72nd percentile. The Steam Machine GPU has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its competitive position is defined entirely by its specifications and percentile placement. The RTX 5060, by contrast, has a full set of recorded measurements. Users seeking a GPU with verified performance data and established driver support should choose the RTX 5060. Users building specifically for a Steam Machine form factor, where the AMD part draws power through the slot with no auxiliary power connectors and runs at 110 W, should select the Steam Machine GPU. The RTX 5060 requires a 1x 8-pin power connector and a 300 W suggested power supply, making it unsuitable for the same constrained installation.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 has an average benchmark score of 26331 across all recorded tests. The AMD Steam Machine GPU has no recorded benchmarks in the database, so no comparable average exists for it.
Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The RTX 5060 sits within 1.2% of four rivals. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary by 0.8%, trails the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 by 0.3%, and trails the AMD Radeon 860M by 0.3%. It leads the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT by 1.2%.
Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?
A: Both use 8 GB of memory on a 128-bit bus. The Steam Machine GPU uses GDDR6 at 18 Gbps effective, producing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5060 uses GDDR7 at 28 Gbps effective, producing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.
Q: What is the power draw difference?
A: The AMD Steam Machine GPU has a 110 W TDP and needs no power connectors. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 has a 145 W TDP, requires a 1x 8-pin connector, and lists a 300 W suggested power supply.
Q: Which GPU has more shading units?
A: The RTX 5060 has 3840 shading units, more than double the Steam Machine GPU's 1792. The RTX 5060 also has 120 tensor cores, while the Steam Machine GPU has none listed.
Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?
A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Steam Machine GPU uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, code-named Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Console GPU generation for Valve and uses a 6 nm process from TSMC. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². Its compute layout includes 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. There are no tensor cores listed.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 uses the GB206 chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It belongs to the GeForce 50 series and uses a 5 nm process from TSMC. The chip contains 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². Its compute layout includes 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, 48 ROPs, 30 ray tracing cores, and 120 tensor cores.
The two chips show opposite design priorities. The AMD part packs more transistors per area at 65.2M per mm² versus the RTX 5060's 121.0M per mm², meaning NVIDIA achieves higher density on a smaller die. The RTX 5060 has a smaller die at 181 mm² but carries 21,900 million transistors versus 13,300 million, reflecting the denser 5 nm process. The Steam Machine GPU has more ROPs at 64 versus 48, which supports its higher pixel rate. The RTX 5060 has more texture units, more shading units, more ray tracing cores, and the addition of tensor cores, giving it a broader feature set for compute and AI workloads.
Specification Differences
The two GPUs differ across nearly every measured field. The process nodes differ, with the Steam Machine GPU at 6 nm and the RTX 5060 at 5 nm, both from TSMC. Transistor counts differ substantially: 13,300 million versus 21,900 million. Die size is 204 mm² for the AMD part and 181 mm² for the NVIDIA part. Transistor density is 65.2M per mm² versus 121.0M per mm².
Clock speeds differ. The Steam Machine GPU has a 1720 MHz base clock, a 2450 MHz boost clock, and a 2250 MHz game clock. The RTX 5060 has a 2280 MHz base clock and a 2497 MHz boost clock, with no game clock listed. Memory clocks also differ: 2250 MHz at 18 Gbps effective for the AMD part, 1750 MHz at 28 Gbps effective for the NVIDIA part.
Memory bandwidth differs significantly. The Steam Machine GPU delivers 288.0 GB/s, while the RTX 5060 delivers 448.0 GB/s. Both use 8 GB, but the Steam Machine GPU uses GDDR6 and the RTX 5060 uses GDDR7. Both use a 128-bit bus.
Compute and rendering rates differ. The Steam Machine GPU produces 17.56 TFLOPS FP32 and 17.56 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1), with a pixel rate of 156.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 274.4 GTexel/s. The RTX 5060 produces 19.18 TFLOPS FP32 and 19.18 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1), with a pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s.
Physical and power specifications differ. The Steam Machine GPU has a 110 W TDP, no power connectors, and no listed slot width, bus interface, or suggested PSU. Its dimensions are 156 mm length, 152 mm height, and 162 mm width. The RTX 5060 has a 145 W TDP, a dual-slot design, a 1x 8-pin power connector, a 300 W suggested PSU, and a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface. Its dimensions are 241 mm length, 111 mm height, and 40 mm width.
Display outputs differ. The Steam Machine GPU has 1x HDMI 2.1a and 1x DisplayPort 2.1. The RTX 5060 has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The RTX 5060 is the only one of the two with a launch MSRP: 299 USD.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Steam Machine GPU and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060. The head-to-head section is empty, and the wins counter shows zero for both sides. This means the comparison must rely on the RTX 5060's standalone benchmark results and the Steam Machine GPU's specification sheet.
The RTX 5060's recorded benchmarks provide a performance profile. Its strongest result is in Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 113321, closely followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 112787. The PassMark G3D score is 20891, and PassMark GPU Compute is 10899. The DirectX 9 result is 225, DirectX 11 is 200, and DirectX 10 is 127. DirectX 12 scores 77. The 2D benchmark scores 1154. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test scores 3628.
The Steam Machine GPU has no benchmark entries, so the data cannot confirm its performance in any of these tests. Its specification sheet suggests certain advantages. Its pixel rate of 156.8 GPixel/s exceeds the RTX 5060's 119.9 GPixel/s, which could benefit rasterization-bound workloads. Its ROP count of 64 versus 48 reinforces this. Its texture rate of 274.4 GTexel/s trails the RTX 5060's 299.6 GTexel/s, however. The RTX 5060 leads in FP32 throughput at 19.18 TFLOPS versus 17.56 TFLOPS, in memory bandwidth at 448.0 GB/s versus 288.0 GB/s, and in shading units at 3840 versus 1792.
The RTX 5060's nearest rival data shows how tightly grouped its performance class is. It sits within 0.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, within 0.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, and within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon 860M. It leads the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT by 1.2%. This places the RTX 5060 in a dense competitive cluster where single-digit percentage differences separate cards.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Steam Machine GPU wins in physical integration scenarios. Its 110 W TDP requires no auxiliary power connectors, so it draws power entirely through the slot. Its compact dimensions of 156 mm length, 152 mm height, and 162 mm width fit a small-form-factor console layout. Its 64 ROPs and pixel rate of 156.8 GPixel/s give it an edge in fill-rate-limited rendering tasks, where the RTX 5060's 48 ROPs and 119.9 GPixel/s lag behind. The Steam Machine GPU's 204 mm² die and 6 nm process also suggest lower complexity in power delivery, though the data does not quantify efficiency beyond the TDP figure.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 wins in raw compute and memory throughput. Its 3840 shading units, 120 tensor cores, and 30 ray tracing cores provide a more robust feature set for modern workloads that use tensor operations or ray tracing. Its FP32 throughput of 19.18 TFLOPS exceeds the Steam Machine GPU's 17.56 TFLOPS. Its memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s is 55.6% higher than the Steam Machine GPU's 288.0 GB/s, which benefits bandwidth-sensitive games and compute tasks. Its texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s also leads the AMD part's 274.4 GTexel/s.
The RTX 5060's benchmark record gives it a verified performance baseline. Its average score of 26331 places it at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, compared to the Steam Machine GPU's 50th percentile. Its nearest rival deltas show it trading blows within 1.2% of established desktop and mobile parts, confirming it operates in a known performance tier. The Steam Machine GPU has no such validation in the database.
The Steam Machine GPU's win condition is its power and form factor. The RTX 5060's win condition is performance and feature completeness. The data does not show a scenario where the Steam Machine GPU outperforms the RTX 5060 in compute benchmarks, because no such benchmarks exist for the Steam Machine GPU. Instead, its advantages are structural: the absence of power connectors, the lower 110 W TDP, and the compact dimensions. The RTX 5060's advantages are measured: higher TFLOPS, higher bandwidth, higher texture rate, tensor cores, and a 72nd percentile standing. Users constrained by the Steam Machine's power and space envelope should favor the AMD part. Users prioritizing measured performance and a 299 USD launch MSRP should favor the RTX 5060.