AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU against the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. Both entries show zero wins in direct comparisons, and neither has an average benchmark score or a list of nearest rivals. This absence of measured data means any quantitative comparison must rely entirely on the architectural and specification fields recorded for each product.

What the recorded data does show is a substantial gap in raw compute capability. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU delivers 8.294 TFLOPS. That places the LX 7G100 at roughly three times the FP32 performance of the Ryzen Z2 GPU, a difference that would be expected to translate into large frame rate advantages in shader-bound workloads if both were measured under identical conditions. The FP16 comparison is even more lopsided: the LX 7G100 achieves 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio relative to FP32, whereas the Ryzen Z2 GPU achieves 8.294 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The LX 7G100 therefore offers roughly six times the FP16 throughput, a characteristic that matters for workloads using half-precision arithmetic.

Pixel and texture throughput follow the same pattern. The LX 7G100 records a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. The Ryzen Z2 GPU records 86.40 GPixel/s and 129.6 GTexel/s. Those figures indicate the LX 7G100 can fill roughly 2.2 times the pixels per second and nearly three times the texels per second. Rasterization-heavy scenes with high resolution and dense texture work would favor the LX 7G100 by a wide margin based on these specifications alone.

Memory bandwidth adds another layer of separation. The LX 7G100 uses a 192 bit bus with GDDR6 memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding 432.0 GB/s. The Ryzen Z2 GPU uses a 128 bit bus with LPDDR5X memory at 937 MHz (7.5 Gbps effective), yielding 119.9 GB/s. The bandwidth advantage for the LX 7G100 is roughly 3.6 times. For texture streaming, large scene data, or high-resolution framebuffers, that bandwidth gap would likely be a dominant factor in real-world performance.

The raw resource counts reinforce the same conclusion. The LX 7G100 packs 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The Ryzen Z2 GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The LX 7G100 carries eight times the shading units, four times the TMUs, and three times the ROPs. These are not close specifications; they describe two products aimed at very different performance classes.

One area where the Ryzen Z2 GPU holds a niche advantage is ray tracing. It includes 12 dedicated RT cores, while the LX 7G100 lists no RT cores in the database. For DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads that rely on hardware-accelerated ray tracing, the Ryzen Z2 GPU has a structural feature the LX 7G100 does not document. The actual performance impact cannot be quantified without benchmark data, but the presence of dedicated RT hardware is a meaningful architectural distinction.

Power consumption separates the two even further. The Ryzen Z2 GPU has a 28 W TDP, while the LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP. The LX 7G100 draws roughly eight times the power budget. That explains the performance gap, but it also frames the two products differently: the Ryzen Z2 GPU is a low-power design, while the LX 7G100 is a high-power desktop part with a dual-slot cooler and a 1x 8-pin power connector.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU is built on RDNA 3.0 architecture and uses the Hawk Point chip. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a proprietary architecture labeled TrueGPU with the 7G106 chip. The database places the Ryzen Z2 GPU in the Console GPU (AMD) generation, while the LX 7G100 belongs to the 7G100 generation.

Manufacturing processes differ by two nodes. The Ryzen Z2 GPU is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The smaller node gives the Ryzen Z2 GPU a transistor density advantage, though the database does not provide a die size or transistor count for the LX 7G100. The Ryzen Z2 GPU packs 25,390 million transistors onto a 178 mm² die, yielding a density of 142.6 million transistors per square millimeter. The LX 7G100 lists both transistor count and die size as unknown, so a direct density comparison is impossible from the recorded data.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The Ryzen Z2 GPU uses 16 GB of LPDDR5X on a 128 bit bus. The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus. The capacity difference favors the Ryzen Z2 GPU by 4 GB, which could matter for workloads with very large working sets. The bandwidth difference heavily favors the LX 7G100, as noted earlier. The memory type also implies different system integration: LPDDR5X is typically soldered and shared with a host processor, while GDDR6 is a discrete graphics memory standard.

Compute organization differs sharply. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Ryzen Z2 GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The LX 7G100 also has no recorded RT cores, while the Ryzen Z2 GPU includes 12. The FP16 ratio differs as well: the Ryzen Z2 GPU runs FP16 at 1:1 with FP32, while the LX 7G100 runs FP16 at 2:1, meaning the LX 7G100 can issue twice as many half-precision operations per cycle.

Clock behavior is only partially documented. The Ryzen Z2 GPU has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2700 MHz. The LX 7G100 lists no base or boost clock in the database, so the FP32 and FP16 figures for the LX 7G100 cannot be traced back to specific clock rates. The memory clocks are recorded for both: the Ryzen Z2 GPU runs memory at 937 MHz (7.5 Gbps effective), and the LX 7G100 runs memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

API support is similar but not identical. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Ryzen Z2 GPU supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. The Ryzen Z2 GPU has a one-version advantage in the Vulkan API.

Physical design and power delivery differ completely. The Ryzen Z2 GPU has no power connectors and no recorded slot width, dimensions, or bus interface. It uses a single USB Type-C display output. The LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card measuring 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width, with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, one 8-pin power connector, and a suggested 550 W power supply.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32, compared to 8.294 TFLOPS for the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU. The LX 7G100 offers roughly three times the single-precision throughput.

Q: Do both GPUs support ray tracing?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU includes 12 dedicated RT cores. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 lists no RT cores in the database, so hardware ray tracing support is only documented for the Ryzen Z2 GPU.

Q: How do the memory systems compare?

A: The Ryzen Z2 GPU has 16 GB of LPDDR5X on a 128 bit bus with 119.9 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has roughly 3.6 times the bandwidth but 4 GB less capacity.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Ryzen Z2 GPU has a 28 W TDP and requires no power connectors. The LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, uses one 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, while the Ryzen Z2 GPU has 768. That is an eightfold difference in favor of the LX 7G100.

Q: What display outputs does each GPU provide?

A: The Ryzen Z2 GPU provides one USB Type-C output. The LX 7G100 provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

Process node: The Ryzen Z2 GPU uses 4 nm at TSMC. The LX 7G100 uses 6 nm at TSMC.

Transistors and die size: The Ryzen Z2 GPU has 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die with a density of 142.6 million per square millimeter. The LX 7G100 lists transistor count and die size as unknown.

Clocks: The Ryzen Z2 GPU has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2700 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no recorded base or boost clock. Memory clock: the Ryzen Z2 GPU runs at 937 MHz (7.5 Gbps effective), the LX 7G100 at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Memory: 16 GB LPDDR5X on a 128 bit bus with 119.9 GB/s bandwidth for the Ryzen Z2 GPU. 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth for the LX 7G100.

Compute units: 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 12 RT cores for the Ryzen Z2 GPU. 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no recorded RT cores for the LX 7G100.

Throughput: 86.40 GPixel/s and 129.6 GTexel/s for the Ryzen Z2 GPU. 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX 7G100. FP32: 8.294 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: 8.294 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power and cooling: 28 W TDP, no power connectors, no slot width for the Ryzen Z2 GPU. 225 W TDP, one 8-pin connector, dual-slot design for the LX 7G100.

Dimensions: The Ryzen Z2 GPU has no recorded length, height, or width. The LX 7G100 measures 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm.

Bus interface: The Ryzen Z2 GPU has no recorded bus interface. The LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Display outputs: One USB Type-C for the Ryzen Z2 GPU. Four DisplayPort 1.4a for the LX 7G100.

API support: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Ryzen Z2 GPU supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Release date: The Ryzen Z2 GPU has a recorded release date of 2024-12-31. The LX 7G100 has a recorded release date of 2026-06-17.

Production status: Both are listed as Active.

The Verdict

The recorded data describes two GPUs with almost no overlap in target positioning. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 leads in FP32 compute, FP16 compute, pixel rate, texture rate, shading units, TMUs, ROPs, memory bandwidth, and memory bus width. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU leads in memory capacity, process node, RT core availability, Vulkan API version, and power efficiency. The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested 550 W power supply, while the Ryzen Z2 GPU runs at 28 W with no power connectors. Those power figures alone indicate different classes of hardware.

The absence of benchmark scores means the database cannot confirm how these specification differences translate into measured performance. But the specification deltas are large enough that the expected performance hierarchy is clear. A GPU with 6144 shading units and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth should outperform a GPU with 768 shading units and 119.9 GB/s of bandwidth in most traditional rendering workloads. The LX 7G100 appears designed for high-throughput desktop rendering, while the Ryzen Z2 GPU appears designed for constrained, low-power environments.

The Ryzen Z2 GPU has the only documented ray tracing hardware. For applications that require hardware RT acceleration, the Ryzen Z2 GPU has a feature the LX 7G100 does not claim. The 16 GB memory capacity also gives the Ryzen Z2 GPU an edge in scenarios where capacity matters more than bandwidth, such as holding very large datasets or textures in local memory.

The LX 7G100 requires a dual-slot chassis, a single 8-pin connector, and a 550 W power supply. The Ryzen Z2 GPU requires no external power connectors and has no recorded slot width. Physical integration requirements are therefore radically different. The LX 7G100 is a full-length desktop card; the Ryzen Z2 GPU has no recorded dimensions at all, suggesting a compact or embedded design.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in raw rendering throughput. Its FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS, pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s put it in a different performance tier from the Ryzen Z2 GPU. For high-resolution rasterization, heavy texturing, or compute workloads that use FP32 arithmetic, the LX 7G100 has the structural advantages. The 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports feeding those 6144 shading units, and the 192 bit bus provides a wider data path than the Ryzen Z2 GPU's 128 bit bus.

The LX 7G100 also wins in FP16 throughput, delivering 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. Workloads that can use half-precision arithmetic, such as certain machine learning inference or image processing pipelines, would see a sixfold advantage over the Ryzen Z2 GPU's 8.294 TFLOPS at 1:1. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs give the LX 7G100 an advantage in multi-monitor desktop setups.

The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU wins in power efficiency. Its 28 W TDP versus 225 W TDP represents an eightfold difference in power draw. For systems with strict thermal or power budgets, the Ryzen Z2 GPU is the only realistic option between the two. The 4 nm process node supports that efficiency, while the LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm node.

The Ryzen Z2 GPU wins in ray tracing capability, being the only one of the two with documented RT cores. It also wins in memory capacity with 16 GB versus 12 GB, which could matter for workloads that need to keep large datasets resident. The Vulkan 1.4 support gives the Ryzen Z2 GPU a newer API version than the LX 7G100's Vulkan 1.3. The single USB Type-C output suggests a simple display configuration, while the LX 7G100's four DisplayPort outputs support more complex display arrays.

The release dates separate the products by roughly a year and a half, with the Ryzen Z2 GPU dated 2024-12-31 and the LX 7G100 dated 2026-06-17. Both are listed as Active production status. The database records no benchmark scores for either GPU, so the actual performance relationship remains unmeasured. The specification analysis, however, points to the LX 7G100 as the higher-throughput part and the Ryzen Z2 GPU as the lower-power, feature-differentiated part.