AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database currently contains no head-to-head benchmark results for this pairing. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU and the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual have not been tested against each other in any shared workload, so there are no comparative scores, win counts, or delta percentages to report. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero, and the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty.

What the data does provide are raw compute and memory specifications that allow a direct architectural comparison. The AMD side delivers 4.147 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the Intel part delivers 12.29 TFLOPS. That places the Intel GPU at roughly 2.96 times the FP32 compute of the AMD part. Texture rate tells a similar story: the Intel GPU sustains 384.0 GTexel/s against 129.6 GTexel/s for the AMD part. Pixel rate favors Intel as well, at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 86.40 GPixel/s.

Memory bandwidth is another major gap. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses a 192 bit bus with GDDR6 memory at 2375 MHz, yielding 456.0 GB/s. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go uses a 128 bit bus with LPDDR5 at 800 MHz, yielding 102.4 GB/s. That is a 4.45 times bandwidth advantage for Intel. Capacity also differs: 24 GB on the Intel card against 16 GB on the AMD part.

The Intel GPU also leads in shading units, texture mapping units, and render output units. It has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The AMD part has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware counts are 20 RT cores on the Intel side versus 12 on the AMD side.

Neither part has a benchmark score in the database. Both carry a percentile ranking of 50 against all GPUs, and both show an average benchmark score of 0. With no measured results, the only quantitative comparisons available are those derived from the specification sheet.

Where Each One Wins

In the absence of benchmark data, the specification records indicate which workloads each part is built to handle. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is structured for compute-heavy and memory-hungry tasks. Its 12.29 TFLOPS FP32, 24.58 TFLOPS FP16, and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth make it the stronger candidate for rendering, simulation, and large dataset processing. The 24 GB frame buffer supports large working sets that would not fit in 16 GB.

The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU is a 28 W part with no power connectors and a single USB Type-C display output. That configuration points toward compact, low-power systems rather than workstation towers. The 16 GB LPDDR5 memory and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth are modest but usable for lighter graphics workloads. The 4.147 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is roughly one third of the Intel part, so it will handle less demanding scenes and smaller assets.

The Intel card is dual-slot, 300 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, requires a 16-pin power connector, and lists a suggested PSU of 800 W. That is a full-size add-in board designed for a desktop chassis with substantial power delivery. The AMD part has no slot width, no length, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU in the database, which suggests an integrated or embedded form factor. The use-case split is therefore clear: the Intel part targets professional workstations and heavy compute, while the AMD part targets power-constrained or portable platforms.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and use different process nodes. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go uses the Rembrandt+ chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses the BMG-G21 chip with Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage Pro Series, built on TSMC's 5 nm process.

Transistor counts differ considerably. The AMD chip contains 13,100 million transistors on a 208 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 63.0M per mm². The Intel chip contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, giving a density of 72.1M per mm². The Intel die is roughly 30.8% larger and packs about 49.6% more transistors.

Memory technology differs as well. The AMD part uses LPDDR5, a low-power memory type, while the Intel part uses GDDR6, a dedicated graphics memory. The memory clock figures reflect that: AMD runs at 800 MHz with 6.4 Gbps effective, Intel runs at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective.

Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both are listed as Active in production status. The AMD part was released on 2024-12-31, and the Intel part on 2025-09-04.

The Intel card uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 bus interface, while the AMD database entry lists no bus interface. The Intel card has four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the AMD part has one USB Type-C output. The Intel part lists a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD; the AMD part has no launch MSRP in the database.

Specification Differences

Clock behavior differs in an interesting way. The AMD part has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2700 MHz, a wide spread that suggests aggressive boosting under load. The Intel part has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, a much narrower range. The AMD boost clock is 300 MHz higher than the Intel boost clock, but the Intel base clock is 1200 MHz higher than the AMD base clock.

Memory configuration: AMD uses 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 128 bit bus with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. Intel uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute units: AMD has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 12 RT cores. Intel has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 RT cores. The Intel part has no tensor core entry, and neither does the AMD part.

Power and physical specs: AMD is rated at 28 W with no power connectors and no slot width. Intel is rated at 400 W, uses a dual-slot cooler, requires one 16-pin connector, and lists an 800 W suggested PSU. Intel dimensions are 300 mm by 110 mm by 40 mm; AMD has no dimensions recorded.

Display outputs: AMD has a single USB Type-C. Intel has four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 connectors.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual delivers 12.29 TFLOPS FP32, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go delivers 4.147 TFLOPS FP32.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does each GPU provide?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual provides 456.0 GB/s from 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go provides 102.4 GB/s from 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 128 bit bus.

Q: What are the power requirements for each part?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go is rated at 28 W and requires no power connectors. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is rated at 400 W, requires a 16-pin power connector, and lists a suggested PSU of 800 W.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing hardware?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual has 20 RT cores. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go has 12 RT cores.

Q: What process nodes are used by each GPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go uses TSMC's 6 nm process. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual uses TSMC's 5 nm process.

The Verdict

The recorded data separates these two GPUs into different categories. The Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is a high-power, high-throughput professional graphics card. Its 12.29 TFLOPS FP32, 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, 24 GB memory, and 400 W TDP place it in workstation territory. The 1,199 USD launch MSRP reinforces that positioning. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go is a 28 W part with 16 GB of LPDDR5, 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and a single USB Type-C output. It is built for efficiency and compactness, not for peak throughput.

Anyone choosing between these two should base the decision on the workload and the platform. For heavy rendering, large datasets, or multi-display professional setups, the Intel card has the compute, memory capacity, and bandwidth to handle those tasks. The four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs and PCIe 5.0 x8 interface support that role. The AMD part makes sense where power draw and physical footprint are the limiting factors, since it draws 28 W, needs no power connector, and has no recorded dimensions that would restrict installation.

The database contains no benchmark scores for either GPU, so the relative performance claims here come directly from the specification records. The Intel part leads in every measured compute and memory metric: FP32, FP16, pixel rate, texture rate, shading units, TMUs, ROPs, RT cores, memory size, memory bandwidth, and process density. The AMD part leads in boost clock, but that single advantage does not offset the broader specification gaps.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: the Intel Arc Pro B60 Dual is the stronger GPU by a wide margin across all recorded compute and memory metrics. The AMD Ryzen Z2 Go is the appropriate choice only when power consumption and form factor are the primary constraints.