AMD Ryzen Z1 GPU vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen Z1 GPU and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. Both products have an empty benchmark array, and the head-to-head comparison table is similarly blank. Consequently, the win counts for each product (0 wins for the Ryzen Z1 GPU, 0 wins for the LX ULTRA) reflect a complete absence of measured performance data rather than a tie.

What the data does provide is a set of theoretical specifications from which performance can be extrapolated. The LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is roughly 9.6 times higher than the Ryzen Z1 GPU's 2.560 TFLOPS. This gap is enormous and would translate into a massive advantage in any compute-bound workload, assuming both architectures scale similarly with raw shader throughput. The LX ULTRA also outputs 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, versus 20.00 GPixel/s and 40.00 GTexel/s for the Ryzen Z1 GPU, indicating a 9.6x and 9.6x advantage respectively in pixel and texture fill rates.

Memory bandwidth tells a similar story. The LX ULTRA's 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit GDDR6 bus is 8.4 times the Ryzen Z1 GPU's 51.20 GB/s over a 64-bit LPDDR5 bus. For bandwidth-sensitive scenarios, such as high-resolution textures or large data sets, the LX ULTRA would be in a different performance class entirely. However, the Ryzen Z1 GPU operates at a 30 W TDP, while the LX ULTRA consumes 225 W, a 7.5x difference in power draw. The data shows the Ryzen Z1 GPU achieves its modest throughput at a fraction of the power envelope, which is a decisive factor for thermally constrained systems.

The absence of benchmark scores means the database cannot confirm how these theoretical numbers translate into real-world frame rates or application performance. Both products sit at the 50th percentile in the database's overall GPU ranking, which is a neutral placement given that no measured data exists to differentiate them. The percentile field appears to be a placeholder rather than a derived statistic, as the average benchmark score for both is exactly 0.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is substantially ahead, with 24.58 TFLOPS compared to the AMD Ryzen Z1 GPU's 2.560 TFLOPS. This represents a 9.6x difference in favor of the LX ULTRA.

Q: How do the memory systems differ between the two cards?

A: The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Ryzen Z1 GPU uses 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 51.20 GB/s. The LX ULTRA has 8.4x the bandwidth and 1.5x the capacity.

Q: What are the power consumption figures for each product?

A: The Ryzen Z1 GPU has a 30 W TDP, while the LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP. The LX ULTRA draws 7.5x more power, and its suggested PSU rating is 550 W, whereas the Ryzen Z1 GPU has no suggested PSU listed.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel fill rate?

A: The LX ULTRA achieves 192.0 GPixel/s, which is 9.6x higher than the Ryzen Z1 GPU's 20.00 GPixel/s. The LX ULTRA also leads in texture rate at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 40.00 GTexel/s.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support. They also both support OpenGL 4.6, while the Ryzen Z1 GPU supports Vulkan 1.4 and the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the physical dimensions of each card?

A: The Ryzen Z1 GPU measures 280 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 21 mm in width. The LX ULTRA measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, and it is a dual-slot design.

The Verdict

The data points to two completely different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen Z1 GPU is a low-power, compact unit with a 30 W TDP, no display outputs, no power connectors, and a 4 nm process node. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is a high-performance, dual-slot card with a 225 W TDP, a 16-pin power connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, and a 6 nm node.

For users who prioritize raw throughput, the LX ULTRA is the only choice based on the recorded specifications. Its 24.58 TFLOPS, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 24 GB memory capacity place it in a different performance tier. The Ryzen Z1 GPU, by contrast, offers a fraction of that performance but at a power draw that is 7.5x lower. The data does not include benchmark scores, so the verdict rests entirely on the specification sheet.

The Ryzen Z1 GPU's 4 nm process and 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die indicate a dense, efficient design. The LX ULTRA's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no direct efficiency comparison is possible from the database. The LX ULTRA's 6 nm node is older, but its much larger memory bus and shader count suggest it was built for maximum performance rather than efficiency.

Neither product has a recorded benchmark score, so the percentile ranking of 50 for both is not informative. The verdict is straightforward: the LX ULTRA is the performance leader by every measured specification except power consumption and process node. The Ryzen Z1 GPU is the efficiency leader, but its performance ceiling is substantially lower.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two products in the database:

• Manufacturer: AMD versus Unknown (Lisuan Tech).
• Chip: Phoenix versus 7G105.
• Architecture: RDNA 3.0 versus TrueGPU.
• Generation: Console GPU (AMD) versus 7G100.
• Process Node: 4 nm versus 6 nm.
• Transistors: 25,390 million versus unknown.
• Die Size: 178 mm² versus unknown.
• Transistor Density: 142.6M / mm² versus null.
• Base Clock: 1500 MHz versus null.
• Boost Clock: 2500 MHz versus null.
• Memory Clock: 800 MHz, 6.4 Gbps effective versus 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective.
• Memory Size: 16 GB versus 24 GB.
• Memory Type: LPDDR5 versus GDDR6.
• Memory Bus Width: 64 bit versus 192 bit.
• Memory Bandwidth: 51.20 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.
• Shading Units: 256 versus 6144.
• TMUs: 16 versus 192.
• ROPs: 8 versus 96.
• RT Cores: 4 versus null.
• Pixel Rate: 20.00 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s.
• Texture Rate: 40.00 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.
• FP32: 2.560 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS.
• FP16: 5.120 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).
• TDP: 30 W versus 225 W.
• Slot Width: null versus Dual-slot.
• Power Connectors: None versus 1x 16-pin.
• Suggested PSU: null versus 550 W.
• Bus Interface: null versus PCIe 4.0 x16.
• Display Outputs: No outputs versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.
• Vulkan Version: 1.4 versus 1.3.
• Dimensions: 280 x 111 x 21 mm versus 268 x 112 x 40 mm.
• Release Date: 2023-09-17 versus 2026-03-16.
• Launch MSRP: 599 USD versus null.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Z1 GPU is built on TSMC's 4 nm process with the Phoenix chip and RDNA 3.0 architecture. It packs 25,390 million transistors into a 178 mm² die, achieving a density of 142.6M transistors per mm². The architecture includes 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, 8 render output units, and 4 ray tracing cores. Its memory subsystem is 16 GB of LPDDR5 on a 64-bit bus, which is narrow but paired with a low 30 W TDP. The GPU has no display outputs and no power connectors, indicating it is designed for embedded or mobile integration rather than standalone use.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip with a TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process. Its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database. The architecture features 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, which are 24x, 12x, and 12x the Ryzen Z1 GPU's counts respectively. It has no ray tracing cores listed. The memory system is 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s. The card includes 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and a dual-slot cooler with a 16-pin power connector.

The process node difference is notable: 4 nm versus 6 nm. The Ryzen Z1 GPU's smaller node allows higher transistor density, but the LX ULTRA compensates with a much larger shader array and wider memory bus. The LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3, while the Ryzen Z1 GPU supports Vulkan 1.4, a minor API version difference. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6.

The Ryzen Z1 GPU's memory clock is 800 MHz with 6.4 Gbps effective, while the LX ULTRA's memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The effective data rate is 2.8x higher on the LX ULTRA, and combined with the wider bus, the bandwidth advantage is substantial.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins in every raw performance metric recorded. Its FP32 compute is 9.6x higher, its texture rate is 9.6x higher, and its pixel rate is 9.6x higher. The memory bandwidth advantage is 8.4x, and the memory capacity advantage is 1.5x. For any workload that scales with shader count, fill rate, or memory bandwidth, such as high-resolution rendering, compute-heavy simulations, or multi-display output, the LX ULTRA is the clear choice. The presence of 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface makes it suitable for a conventional desktop graphics card role.

The AMD Ryzen Z1 GPU wins in power efficiency. Its 30 W TDP is 7.5x lower than the LX ULTRA's 225 W, and it requires no external power connectors. Its 4 nm process node and higher transistor density (142.6M / mm²) indicate a design focused on minimizing energy use per transistor. The Ryzen Z1 GPU also supports Vulkan 1.4, a newer API version than the LX ULTRA's Vulkan 1.3. For thermally constrained systems, passively cooled designs, or battery-powered devices where a 225 W power draw is infeasible, the Ryzen Z1 GPU is the only viable option.

The data shows the Ryzen Z1 GPU has a launch MSRP of 599 USD, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded launch price. The Ryzen Z1 GPU's release date of 2023-09-17 predates the LX ULTRA's 2026-03-16 by roughly two and a half years. Neither product has benchmark scores, so the use-case split is based purely on specifications: the LX ULTRA for performance, the Ryzen Z1 GPU for efficiency and compact integration.