AMD Radeon RX 9070 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 has a complete benchmark record, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This makes direct numerical comparison impossible for any test. The RX 9070's average benchmark score is 23877, placing it at the 69th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The LX ULTRA holds a 50th percentile rank but its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, meaning no tests have been run or submitted.

The RX 9070's individual test results provide a detailed performance profile. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 6290. Geekbench OpenCL returns 131539, while Geekbench Vulkan shows 58705. Passmark results break down as follows: DirectX 10 scores 141, DirectX 11 scores 281, DirectX 12 scores 74, DirectX 9 scores 343, G2D scores 1280, G3D scores 25381, and GPU Compute scores 14737.

The nearest rivals for the RX 9070 are all NVIDIA and AMD models with comparable average scores. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z averages 23736, which is 0.6% behind the RX 9070. The AMD Radeon RX 6800S averages 24063, putting it 0.8% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile averages 23628, 1.1% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER averages 24170, 1.2% ahead. These margins are narrow, indicating the RX 9070 sits in a tightly contested performance band.

Since the LX ULTRA has zero recorded benchmarks, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The data shows the RX 9070 is the only card in this pairing with measurable performance. The wins count stands at 0 for both cards in the head-to-head benchmark table, but that reflects missing data for the LX ULTRA rather than actual parity.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports selecting the AMD Radeon RX 9070 for any workload requiring verified performance metrics. The LX ULTRA offers no benchmark evidence to evaluate its real-world capability. The RX 9070 delivers 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 564.5 GTexel/s texture rate, and 322.6 GPixel/s pixel rate. The LX ULTRA specifies 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 384.0 GTexel/s, and 192.0 GPixel/s. In every measured throughput category where both have published specifications, the RX 9070 holds a numerical advantage.

The RX 9070 also has a higher memory bandwidth at 644.6 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s for the LX ULTRA, despite the latter having more total memory at 24 GB versus 16 GB. The RX 9070 uses a 256-bit memory bus with GDDR6 running at 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective). The LX ULTRA uses a 192-bit bus with GDDR6 at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The wider bus and faster memory clock give the RX 9070 a clear bandwidth lead.

For users who prioritize compute-heavy tasks, the RX 9070's FP32 figure of 36.13 TFLOPS exceeds the LX ULTRA's 24.58 TFLOPS by a substantial margin. The LX ULTRA does offer higher FP16 throughput at 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) compared to the RX 9070's 36.13 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which matters for workloads using reduced-precision arithmetic. However, the RX 9070's 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio indicates no throughput penalty for mixed-precision work.

The RX 9070 also supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 9070 uses PCIe 5.0 x16 while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16, giving the AMD card twice the interface bandwidth. These interface differences matter for data transfer-heavy applications.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 wins in rasterization throughput. Its 128 ROPs and 224 TMUs deliver 322.6 GPixel/s and 564.5 GTexel/s respectively. The LX ULTRA has 96 ROPs and 192 TMUs, producing 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The RX 9070's pixel rate is roughly 68% higher, and its texture rate is roughly 47% higher. For traditional gaming workloads with heavy fill-rate demands, the RX 9070 holds a decisive edge.

The RX 9070 also wins in ray tracing capability. It includes 56 dedicated RT cores, while the LX ULTRA lists no RT core count. The RX 9070's RDNA 4.0 architecture is built with ray tracing acceleration as a core feature. The LX ULTRA's TrueGPU architecture has no documented RT hardware, so it likely relies on compute-based ray tracing, which is generally slower.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins in memory capacity. Its 24 GB GDDR6 exceeds the RX 9070's 16 GB by 8 GB. For workloads with very large datasets that exceed 16 GB, such as certain AI inference models or high-resolution texture packs, the extra capacity avoids memory spills. The LX ULTRA also wins in FP16 compute throughput at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 36.13 TFLOPS, assuming software can exploit the 2:1 ratio.

The LX ULTRA has a more compact physical footprint. Its dimensions are 268 mm length, 112 mm height, and 40 mm width. The RX 9070's dimensions are not recorded in the database. The LX ULTRA also uses a single 16-pin power connector, while the RX 9070 requires two 8-pin connectors. This simplifies cabling for builds with modular power supplies.

The RX 9070 wins on display output versatility. It offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a. The LX ULTRA offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a but no HDMI output. DisplayPort 2.1a supports higher bandwidth than 1.4a, enabling higher refresh rates at 4K and above. The HDMI port on the RX 9070 is useful for connecting to televisions and monitors without DisplayPort inputs.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 has 3584. The LX ULTRA's count is roughly 71% higher.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RX 9070 achieves 644.6 GB/s over a 256-bit bus with memory at 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective). The LX ULTRA achieves 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit bus with memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The RX 9070 has about 49% more bandwidth.

Q: Which card has a higher pixel fill rate?

A: The RX 9070 has a pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s, compared to 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX ULTRA. The RX 9070 is approximately 68% faster in this metric.

Q: Does the LX ULTRA support HDMI output?

A: No. The LX ULTRA has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs only. The RX 9070 includes 1x HDMI 2.1b in addition to 3x DisplayPort 2.1a.

Q: What process nodes are used?

A: The RX 9070 uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 357 mm² and 53,900 million transistors. The LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, with transistor count and die size recorded as unknown.

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The RX 9070 has an average benchmark score of 23877 across its recorded tests. The LX ULTRA has an average score of 0 because no benchmarks are recorded in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, part of the Navi IV generation in the RX 9000 series. Its chip is designated Navi 48. The process node is 4 nm at TSMC, with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the TrueGPU architecture, generation 7G100, with the chip designated 7G105. It uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown in the database.

The RX 9070 has 3584 shading units, 224 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 56 RT cores. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no recorded RT core count. The RX 9070's lower shading unit count is offset by its higher clock speeds: base 1330 MHz, boost 2520 MHz, and game clock 2070 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no base, boost, or game clock figures recorded.

Memory architecture differs significantly. The RX 9070 uses 16 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus at 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective), producing 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), producing 432.0 GB/s. Both use GDDR6, but the RX 9070's narrower capacity and wider bus favors bandwidth, while the LX ULTRA's wider capacity and narrower bus favors capacity.

Compute throughput shows a split. The RX 9070 delivers 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 and 36.13 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. The LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The RX 9070's FP32 performance is about 47% higher, while the LX ULTRA's FP16 performance is about 36% higher.

Power and interface specifications also differ. The RX 9070 has a TDP of 220 W, while the LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W. Both suggest a 550 W power supply. The RX 9070 uses 2x 8-pin power connectors and PCIe 5.0 x16. The LX ULTRA uses 1x 16-pin connector and PCIe 4.0 x16. Both are dual-slot cards.

API support shows minor differences. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 9070 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs also differ: the RX 9070 has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a, while the LX ULTRA has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The RX 9070 has a launch MSRP of 549 USD. Its release date is recorded as 2025-03-05. The LX ULTRA's release date is 2026-03-16, and it has no recorded launch MSRP. The RX 9070 lists its predecessor as Navi III, while the LX ULTRA has no predecessor recorded. Both are listed as Active in production status.