AMD Radeon RX 9070 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no directly paired benchmark scores for the AMD Radeon RX 9070 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The head-to-head test matrix is empty, which means no single application or synthetic test can be used to declare a definitive winner from side-by-side runs. However, the available data allows for a comparative analysis based on architectural capabilities, compute throughput, and memory subsystem specifications.

For the AMD Radeon RX 9070, the database lists a substantial set of benchmark results. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 23,877, placing it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs tracked. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), it records a score of 6,290. Geekbench OpenCL returns 131,539, while Geekbench Vulkan shows 58,705. PassMark GPU Compute yields 14,737, and PassMark G3D scores 25,381. The RX 9070 sits 0.6% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (average score 23,736) and 1.1% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile (average score 23,628). It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6800S by 0.8% (average score 24,063) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER by 1.2% (average score 24,170).

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmarks in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 50. There are no nearest rivals entries for it. This absence of measured performance data means any comparison between the two cards must rely on their listed specifications rather than empirical test results.

Given the lack of head-to-head scores, the biggest "win" for the RX 9070 is the sheer volume of validated performance data. The biggest caveat for the LX 7G100 is the complete lack of such data. The database indicates the RX 9070 is an active product with a known release date and established performance profile, while the LX 7G100 is also active but unmeasured.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 uses the Navi 48 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, part of the Navi IV generation (RX 9000 series). It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, containing 53,900 million transistors on a die size of 357 mm². The transistor density calculates to 151.0 million per mm².

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with an architecture labeled "TrueGPU," from the 7G100 generation. It is also built by TSMC, but on a 6 nm process. The transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no density figure can be computed.

Compute resources differ significantly. The RX 9070 has 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operations units. It includes 56 dedicated ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100 has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing cores are listed. The higher shading unit count on the LX 7G100 suggests a different design philosophy, likely favoring raw parallel compute over the RX 9070's more balanced feature set.

Clock speeds tell a contrasting story. The RX 9070 has a base clock of 1330 MHz, a boost clock of 2520 MHz, and a game clock of 2070 MHz. The LX 7G100 lists no base, boost, or game clocks at all. The memory clock for the RX 9070 is 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective), while the LX 7G100 runs its memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystems diverge as well. The RX 9070 comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, which produces 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 9070's wider bus and faster memory clock give it a substantial bandwidth advantage.

Rasterization and texture throughput reflect these differences. The RX 9070 achieves a pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s. The LX 7G100 delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. In FP32 compute, the RX 9070 reaches 36.13 TFLOPS, while the LX 7G100 produces 24.58 TFLOPS. For FP16, the RX 9070 maintains 36.13 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, whereas the LX 7G100 doubles to 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. This indicates the LX 7G100 is optimized for workloads that can leverage FP16 throughput, while the RX 9070 offers more balanced compute.

The RX 9070 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The RX 9070 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX 7G100 also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but only Vulkan 1.3.

Display outputs differ: the RX 9070 provides one HDMI 2.1b port and three DisplayPort 2.1a outputs. The LX 7G100 offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The RX 9070 uses two 8-pin power connectors, while the LX 7G100 requires only one 8-pin connector. Both cards are dual-slot designs with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

The Verdict

The data shows that the AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a fully measured product with a clear performance profile. It sits in the 69th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23,877. Its nearest rivals are all within a 1.2% margin, indicating it performs in a tight band around the RTX 2080 SUPER, RX 6800S, GTX TITAN Z, and RTX 3080 Mobile. This is a card that has been validated across multiple benchmark suites, and its scores are consistent with a mid-to-high-range GPU.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is listed as active, but it has no benchmark data, no average score, and no nearest rivals. Its percentile is 50, which is the median by definition, but that figure carries no weight without actual test results. The LX 7G100 cannot be compared on performance because no performance has been recorded.

For raw specifications, the RX 9070 wins on memory capacity (16 GB vs. 12 GB), memory bandwidth (644.6 GB/s vs. 432.0 GB/s), pixel rate (322.6 GPixel/s vs. 192.0 GPixel/s), texture rate (564.5 GTexel/s vs. 384.0 GTexel/s), FP32 compute (36.13 TFLOPS vs. 24.58 TFLOPS), and process node (4 nm vs. 6 nm). It also has ray tracing cores, which the LX 7G100 lacks. The LX 7G100 counters with a higher shading unit count (6,144 vs. 3,584), higher FP16 throughput (49.15 TFLOPS vs. 36.13 TFLOPS), and a single 8-pin power connector versus the RX 9070's two 8-pin connectors.

The verdict leans clearly toward the RX 9070 for anyone seeking a GPU with proven performance and a complete feature set. The LX 7G100 remains an unknown quantity, and its architectural choices appear geared toward FP16-heavy compute rather than balanced gaming performance. The RX 9070 is the safer, more documented choice.

Specification Differences

The two cards diverge in nearly every measurable specification category. The RX 9070 uses a 4 nm process, while the LX 7G100 uses 6 nm. The RX 9070 has 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die; the LX 7G100's transistor count and die size are unknown. Shading units differ by a wide margin: 3,584 for the RX 9070 versus 6,144 for the LX 7G100. TMUs are 224 against 192, and ROPs are 128 against 96. The RX 9070 has 56 ray tracing cores; the LX 7G100 has none listed.

Clock speeds: the RX 9070 lists base, boost, and game clocks, while the LX 7G100 lists none. Memory clocks: 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective) versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Memory size: 16 GB versus 12 GB, both GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit versus 192-bit. Bandwidth: 644.6 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

Compute rates: pixel rate 322.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s; texture rate 564.5 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32: 36.13 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: 36.13 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). TDP: 220 W versus 225 W. Power connectors: 2x 8-pin versus 1x 8-pin. Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs: one HDMI 2.1b plus three DisplayPort 2.1a versus four DisplayPort 1.4a. Vulkan support: 1.4 versus 1.3. The RX 9070 has a launch MSRP of 549 USD; the LX 7G100 has no MSRP listed.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 has 644.6 GB/s, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 432.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the LX 7G100 support ray tracing?

A: No ray tracing cores are listed for the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The RX 9070 includes 56 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the FP32 compute performance for each card?

A: The RX 9070 delivers 36.13 TFLOPS, and the LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS.

Q: How many shading units does each GPU have?

A: The RX 9070 has 3,584 shading units, while the LX 7G100 has 6,144 shading units.

Q: Which card uses a newer PCIe interface?

A: The RX 9070 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, and the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores recorded for the LX 7G100?

A: The database lists no benchmarks for the LX 7G100. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals entries.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 wins in every scenario that relies on measured performance, memory capacity, memory bandwidth, rasterization speed, and ray tracing. Its FP32 compute is 36.13 TFLOPS, which is 47% higher than the LX 7G100's 24.58 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s is 68% higher than 192.0 GPixel/s, and its texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s is 47% higher than 384.0 GTexel/s. The RX 9070 also has a 256-bit memory bus versus 192-bit, and 16 GB versus 12 GB of VRAM. For gaming, DirectX 12 Ultimate, and general GPU compute, the RX 9070 is the stronger choice based on all available data.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in a narrower set of categories. It has 6,144 shading units, which is 71% more than the RX 9070's 3,584. Its FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS is 36% higher than the RX 9070's 36.13 TFLOPS, suggesting a design intended for FP16-heavy workloads. It also uses a single 8-pin power connector, which simplifies installation compared to the RX 9070's two 8-pin connectors. Its physical dimensions are recorded (294 mm length, 120 mm height, 49 mm width), while the RX 9070's dimensions are not listed. For workloads that specifically leverage FP16 compute, the LX 7G100 has a theoretical advantage. For every other measured or specified metric, the RX 9070 leads.