AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs Intel Arc A310E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE and the Intel Arc A310E. However, the database does include individual benchmark results for the AMD card, while the Intel card has no recorded benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,424 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,309. The Intel Arc A310E has an empty benchmark array, meaning no comparable scores exist in the database for direct numerical comparison.

The average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 57,367, placing it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs tracked. The Intel Arc A310E sits in the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, which reflects the absence of recorded benchmark data rather than a measured performance level. Without head-to-head entries, the database cannot produce a direct delta percentage between these two cards. The nearest rivals for the AMD card provide context: the Intel Arc A580 scores 57,756 on average, which is 0.7% higher, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085 (1.2% higher), the Intel Arc A570M scores 58,239 (1.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58,392 (1.8% higher). These figures show the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE sits slightly below a cluster of cards averaging near 58,000, with all deltas under 2%.

The Intel Arc A310E has no nearest rivals listed in the database, so its performance position cannot be established through comparative scores. The data indicates the AMD card delivers substantially higher raw compute metrics, including 34.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance versus 3.072 TFLOPS for the Intel card, and a texture rate of 535.7 GTexel/s versus 64.00 GTexel/s. The 3DMark result for the AMD card confirms it handles modern DX12 workloads, while the Intel card's lack of any recorded benchmark data limits quantitative analysis.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE wins on every measurable compute and bandwidth metric in the database. Its memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s exceeds the Intel Arc A310E's 124.0 GB/s by a wide margin. The AMD card uses a 192-bit memory bus with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the Intel card uses a 64-bit bus with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. The AMD card's pixel rate of 267.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 535.7 GTexel/s dwarf the Intel card's 32.00 GPixel/s and 64.00 GTexel/s respectively. In FP32 throughput, the AMD card delivers 34.28 TFLOPS, more than 11 times the Intel card's 3.072 TFLOPS. The FP16 comparison shows the AMD card at 34.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) versus the Intel card at 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), meaning the AMD card also leads in half-precision work.

The Intel Arc A310E wins in physical footprint and power requirements. It is a single-slot card measuring 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, with no external power connectors and a 75 W TDP. The AMD card is a dual-slot design requiring two 8-pin power connectors and a 220 W TDP. The Intel card also suggests a 250 W power supply compared to the AMD card's 550 W recommendation. For constrained builds or low-power embedded systems, the Intel card's smaller size and lower power draw are clear advantages, though these are not performance wins in the benchmark sense.

The AMD card's 87th percentile ranking against all GPUs indicates it outperforms the majority of tracked graphics hardware. The Intel card's 50th percentile, based on zero recorded benchmark scores, does not indicate a measured performance level. The AMD card supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Intel card uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The AMD card offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a outputs, while the Intel card provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses the Navi 48 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation and the Radeon RX 9000 series. The chip contains 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The Intel Arc A310E uses the DG2-128 chip built on Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Alchemist (Arc 3) generation. The Intel chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The AMD chip uses a significantly smaller process node and packs more than seven times the transistor count into a die roughly twice the size.

The AMD card's RDNA 4.0 architecture includes 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 48 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc A310E's Xe-HPG architecture includes 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 6 ray tracing cores. The AMD card has no dedicated tensor cores listed, and neither does the Intel card. The clock behavior differs notably: the AMD card has a base clock of 1420 MHz, a boost clock of 2790 MHz, and a game clock of 2220 MHz, while the Intel card runs at a flat 2000 MHz for both base and boost with no game clock listed. The AMD card's memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), while the Intel card's memory runs at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

The production status differs as well. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is listed as Active, released on 2025-05-07, with its predecessor being the Navi III generation and no successor listed. The Intel Arc A310E is listed as End-of-life, released on 2024-03-31, with Xe Graphics as its predecessor and Battlemage as its successor. The AMD card has a launch MSRP of 549 USD, while the Intel card has no launch MSRP recorded. The AMD card's interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Intel card uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Both cards support identical API levels: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Verdict

The data shows a complete performance separation between these two cards. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is an active, high-end product with recorded benchmark scores, an 87th percentile ranking, and an average benchmark score of 57,367. The Intel Arc A310E is an end-of-life product with no recorded benchmark scores, a 50th percentile ranking, and an average benchmark score of zero. Every compute metric in the database favors the AMD card by a large factor: FP32 performance is 34.28 TFLOPS versus 3.072 TFLOPS, memory bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s versus 124.0 GB/s, and the shading unit count is 3,072 versus 768.

For users selecting a GPU based on the recorded data, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the only card with measurable performance evidence. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,424 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,309 provide concrete reference points. The Intel Arc A310E offers no benchmark data to support a performance comparison, so its capabilities cannot be quantified from the database. The AMD card's nearest rivals, all within 1.8% of its average score, include the Intel Arc A580, AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, Intel Arc A570M, and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which places its performance in a specific cluster of mid-range to high-end cards.

The Intel Arc A310E does hold advantages in form factor and power consumption. Its single-slot design, 75 W TDP, no external power connectors, and 250 W suggested power supply make it suitable for systems where space and power draw are primary constraints. Its 168 mm length and 69 mm height are compact dimensions. The AMD card's dual-slot design, 220 W TDP, two 8-pin connectors, and 550 W suggested power supply require a more substantial power delivery system and chassis. The AMD card also has a launch MSRP of 549 USD, while the Intel card has no listed launch MSRP.

The production statuses reinforce the product positioning. The AMD card is active and current, while the Intel card is end-of-life with a successor named Battlemage. The AMD card's release date of 2025-05-07 is over a year after the Intel card's 2024-03-31 release. The architecture generations reflect this timeline: RDNA 4.0 represents AMD's latest graphics architecture, while Xe-HPG is the first-generation Intel discrete GPU architecture.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher FP32 performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE delivers 34.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance, while the Intel Arc A310E delivers 3.072 TFLOPS.

Q: What is the memory capacity and bus width of each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A310E have any recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Arc A310E has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of zero, and no nearest rivals listed.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has a 220 W TDP, requires two 8-pin power connectors, and suggests a 550 W power supply. The Intel Arc A310E has a 75 W TDP, requires no external power connectors, and suggests a 250 W power supply.

Q: Which card uses a smaller manufacturing process node?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Arc A310E uses a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is listed as Active. The Intel Arc A310E is listed as End-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE | Intel Arc A310E |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Xe-HPG |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 53,900 million | 7,200 million |

| Die Size | 357 mm² | 157 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 151.0M / mm² | 45.9M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1420 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2790 MHz | 2000 MHz |

| Game Clock | 2220 MHz | None |

| Memory Clock | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective | 1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 12 GB | 4 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 192 bit | 64 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 124.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 3072 | 768 |

| TMUs | 192 | 32 |

| ROPs | 96 | 16 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 6 |

| Pixel Rate | 267.8 GPixel/s | 32.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 535.7 GTexel/s | 64.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 34.28 TFLOPS | 3.072 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 34.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 220 W | 75 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 550 W | 250 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 168 mm x 69 mm x 20 mm |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-05-07 | 2024-03-31 |

| Predecessor | Navi III | Xe Graphics |

| Successor | None | Battlemage |

| Launch MSRP | 549 USD | None |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 87 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 57,367 | 0 |