AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP vs Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head measurements between the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP and the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile. Instead, the comparison relies on aggregate scores and percentile rankings. The AMD part holds a decisive advantage in raw compute performance. Its average benchmark score of 63,830 places it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs tracked, while the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile sits in the 50th percentile with no recorded average score from the database.

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP delivers 88,183 points in Geekbench OpenCL and 39,476 points in Geekbench Vulkan. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark entries in either test. This absence of data means the comparison is defined by architectural capacity rather than measured results. The AMD card produces 24.99 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, compared to 1.792 TFLOPS for the Intel integrated solution. That is a 13.9x difference in raw floating-point throughput.

Memory bandwidth further separates the two. The RX 9060 XT LP uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 322.3 GB/s. The Intel part relies on System Shared memory, with bandwidth described as System Dependent and no fixed figure available. The AMD card also operates at a 3050 MHz boost clock and a 2450 MHz game clock, while the Intel GPU boosts to 1750 MHz with a 300 MHz base clock. Pixel rate for the AMD card is 195.2 GPixel/s, versus 28.00 GPixel/s for the Intel part. Texture rate is 390.4 GTexel/s versus 56.00 GTexel/s.

The nearest rivals for the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, as recorded in the database, include the NVIDIA CMP 30HX with an average score of 63,842 (a 0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 7600M at 63,775 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63,693 (0.2% ahead), and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 at 64,212 (0.6% behind). These margins are small, indicating the RX 9060 XT LP sits in a tightly contested performance band. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has no nearest rivals listed, reflecting its status as an integrated GPU with limited direct competition in the database.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is a discrete add-in card with a 140 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, and a 1x 8-pin power connector. It requires a 300 W suggested power supply. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile is an integrated graphics processor with a 65 W TDP and no dedicated power connectors. It shares system memory and its output is portable device dependent.

For users selecting a discrete GPU solution, the RX 9060 XT LP is the superior choice based on every measurable metric in the database. Its FP32 throughput is 24.99 TFLOPS, its memory bandwidth is 322.3 GB/s, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part also supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but its compute capacity is 1.792 TFLOPS FP32, and its memory bandwidth is system dependent.

The RX 9060 XT LP ranks in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, placing it well above the midpoint. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.6% of its average score, which shows that it performs competitively against similarly positioned discrete GPUs. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile, at the 50th percentile, represents a baseline integrated solution. The absence of benchmark scores for the Intel part means the database cannot confirm its real-world performance, but its specifications suggest it is not in the same class.

The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward: the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is designed for demanding workloads, while the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile serves as a low-power integrated option for portable devices. Neither part targets the same user. The AMD card is a discrete component with active cooling and external power, whereas the Intel GPU is embedded and draws from system resources.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP wins in every category where the database provides comparable specifications. It has more shading units (2048 versus 512), more texture mapping units (128 versus 32), and more raster operation units (64 versus 16). It also includes 32 dedicated ray tracing cores, while the Intel part lists no RT core count. The AMD card uses a 4 nm process from TSMC with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. The Intel part uses a 10 nm process from Intel with no transistor or die size data recorded.

In memory capacity, the RX 9060 XT LP offers 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile uses System Shared memory, meaning it has no fixed allocation. This gives the AMD card a clear advantage in scenarios requiring large textures or datasets. The AMD card also supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Intel part connects via Ring Bus.

The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile wins in power efficiency. Its 65 W TDP is substantially lower than the AMD card's 140 W TDP. It requires no external power connectors and no dedicated power supply recommendation. For thin-and-light laptops or low-power systems, the Intel part is the only viable option in this comparison, as the AMD card's dual-slot design and 8-pin connector are incompatible with such form factors.

The AMD card also leads in display output flexibility. It provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a outputs. The Intel part's outputs are portable device dependent, meaning they vary by the host device. The AMD card's release date is recorded as December 16, 2025, while the Intel part launched on December 13, 2023. The AMD card is the newer product.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP delivers 24.99 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile delivers 1.792 TFLOPS.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile have dedicated memory?

A: No. Its memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as System Shared, with bandwidth described as System Dependent.

Q: What is the power requirement difference between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has a 140 W TDP and a suggested 300 W power supply. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has a 65 W TDP and no suggested power supply.

Q: How do their benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has an average benchmark score of 63,830 and ranks in the 89th percentile. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores and ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Which GPU supports more advanced DirectX features?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Q: What are the pixel and texture rates for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has a pixel rate of 195.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 390.4 GTexel/s. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile has a pixel rate of 28.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 56.00 GTexel/s.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is built on the Navi 44 chip using RDNA 4.0 architecture, part of the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 29,700 million transistors and a die size of 199 mm². Transistor density is 149.2M per mm². The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile uses the Meteor Lake chip with Xe-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M (Meteor Lake) generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel, with no transistor count, die size, or density recorded.

Clock behavior differs significantly. The AMD card has a base clock of 1380 MHz, a boost clock of 3050 MHz, and a game clock of 2450 MHz. Its memory runs at 2518 MHz, with 20.1 Gbps effective. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1750 MHz, with no game clock or fixed memory clock listed.

The compute unit configuration separates the two. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP contains 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 RT cores. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile contains 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with no RT core count listed. The AMD card's FP16 throughput matches its FP32 at 24.99 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The Intel part produces 3.584 TFLOPS of FP16, which is a 2:1 ratio relative to its FP32 output.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The AMD card uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, achieving 322.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part uses System Shared memory, with no fixed size, type, bus width, or bandwidth. This makes the AMD card suitable for large-buffer workloads, while the Intel part is constrained by the host system's memory configuration.

The AMD card is a dual-slot discrete GPU with a 1x 8-pin power connector and a 140 W TDP. It recommends a 300 W power supply. The Intel part is an IGP with a 65 W TDP, no power connectors, and no power supply recommendation. The AMD card interfaces via PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Intel part uses a Ring Bus. Display outputs for the AMD card are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a. The Intel part's outputs are portable device dependent.

Both GPUs support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1). The AMD card's production status is Active, and its predecessor is Navi III. The Intel part's predecessor is HD Graphics-M, and its production status is also Active. The AMD card was released on December 16, 2025, and the Intel part on December 13, 2023.