AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM vs Intel Arc A570M Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data does not include any shared benchmark results for the AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM and the Intel Arc A570M. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and no win counts are assigned to either product. However, the database does contain a Geekbench OpenCL score for the Intel Arc A570M, which provides a reference point for its measured compute performance.

The Intel Arc A570M returns a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239. This places the part at the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database, a strong showing for a mobile-oriented discrete GPU. Its nearest rivals in the database, based on average score, are the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 58,392 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 58,085 (0.3% lower), the NVIDIA P102-100 at 58,528 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 at 58,657 (0.7% higher). The Arc A570M sits within a narrow band of roughly 1% of these four products, indicating that its compute performance in OpenCL is tightly grouped with a mix of desktop and workstation parts from both AMD and NVIDIA.

The AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM has no benchmark entries in the database. Its percentile versus all GPUs is recorded at 50, but this value is not derived from any measured score, as the average benchmark score is 0. Consequently, direct numerical comparison with the Intel part is not possible from the available facts. The absence of data means any performance relationship between these two products must be inferred from their architectural and specification differences, rather than from observed test results.

The Intel Arc A570M, despite its lower transistor count and older process node, manages to keep pace with much larger desktop GPUs in the OpenCL test. The delta percentages against its nearest rivals are all under 1%, which underscores how tightly clustered these scores are. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, a high-end desktop part, is nearly identical in score, just 0.3% ahead. The RX 5600 OEM, a lower-tier desktop card, is 0.3% behind. This suggests the Arc A570M delivers compute throughput comparable to a wide range of desktop products, even though its memory bus and bandwidth are smaller than some of those rivals.

For the AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM, the lack of benchmark data is a significant gap. Without a measured score, the database cannot place it relative to the Arc A570M or any other GPU. The 50th percentile figure is a placeholder rather than a result, and the average benchmark score of 0 confirms no tests have been logged. This is not a statement about actual capability, only about the completeness of the database record.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc A570M have a recorded benchmark score?

A: Yes, the database shows a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 for the Intel Arc A570M, placing it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A570M compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Arc A570M is within 0.7% of all four nearest rivals. It sits 0.3% below the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, 0.3% above the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, 0.5% below the NVIDIA P102-100, and 0.7% below the AMD Radeon PRO V710.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM have any benchmark results?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: What process node does each GPU use?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM uses a 4 nm process, while the Intel Arc A570M uses a 6 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

Q: Which GPU has more memory?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 144.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM has a TDP of 92 W, while the Intel Arc A570M has a TDP of 75 W.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural families and process generations. The AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, using the Navi 44 chip, and belongs to the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. The Intel Arc A570M uses the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-256 chip, belonging to the Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) generation. These are fundamentally different design philosophies, reflected in the chip layouts, transistor budgets, and feature implementations.

The process nodes differ significantly. AMD uses TSMC's 4 nm process, while Intel uses TSMC's 6 nm process. This translates into a substantial difference in transistor density. The AMD chip packs 29,700 million transistors onto a 199 mm² die, yielding a density of 149.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel chip contains 11,500 million transistors on a larger 269 mm² die, giving a density of 42.8 million transistors per square millimeter. The AMD part achieves more than three times the transistor density, a direct consequence of the newer node.

Shader core counts also diverge sharply. The AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The Intel Arc A570M has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. Both have 16 ray tracing cores. Despite having twice the shader count and TMUs, the Intel part produces lower pixel and texture rates: 83.20 GPixel/s versus 166.4 GPixel/s for AMD, while texture rates are identical at 166.4 GTexel/s. This indicates that clock speed plays a decisive role in realized throughput.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The AMD GPU runs at a 1330 MHz base clock, a 1920 MHz game clock, and a 2600 MHz boost clock. The Intel GPU operates at a 900 MHz base clock and a 1300 MHz boost clock, with no game clock listed. The AMD part's boost clock is effectively double that of the Intel part. This clock advantage, combined with the RDNA 4.0 architecture, drives the AMD GPU's higher FP32 throughput of 10.65 TFLOPS versus 5.325 TFLOPS for Intel.

FP16 performance is recorded differently for the two. The AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM achieves 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio to FP32, indicating full-rate execution. The Intel Arc A570M also reaches 10.65 TFLOPS FP16, but at a 2:1 ratio, meaning it uses half the rate of FP32. Both end up at the same FP16 number, but through different architectural paths.

Memory architecture presents another contrast. The AMD GPU uses 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with 144.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel GPU uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part has twice the memory capacity and significantly more bandwidth, which matters for workloads that are bandwidth-limited rather than compute-limited.

The bus interface also differs. The AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Intel Arc A570M uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The AMD part's interface offers more lanes and a newer standard, which can matter for data transfer between the GPU and host system, though the practical impact depends on the workload.

Form factor and power delivery differ as well. The AMD GPU is a dual-slot card with a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested PSU rating of 250 W. The Intel GPU is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) form factor with no power connectors and no suggested PSU listed. This reflects their intended deployment: the AMD part is an add-in board for desktop systems, while the Intel part is designed for mobile or embedded use.

Specification Differences

The following specification fields differ between the AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM and the Intel Arc A570M:

• Architecture: RDNA 4.0 versus Xe-HPG
• Chip: Navi 44 versus DG2-256
• Generation: Navi IV (RX 9000) versus Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile)
• Process node: 4 nm versus 6 nm
• Transistors: 29,700 million versus 11,500 million
• Die size: 199 mm² versus 269 mm²
• Transistor density: 149.2M / mm² versus 42.8M / mm²
• Base clock: 1330 MHz versus 900 MHz
• Boost clock: 2600 MHz versus 1300 MHz
• Game clock: 1920 MHz versus not listed
• Memory clock: 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
• Memory size: 4 GB versus 8 GB
• Memory bus width: 64 bit versus 128 bit
• Memory bandwidth: 144.0 GB/s versus 224.0 GB/s
• Shading units: 1024 versus 2048
• TMUs: 64 versus 128
• Pixel rate: 166.4 GPixel/s versus 83.20 GPixel/s
• FP32: 10.65 TFLOPS versus 5.325 TFLOPS
• FP16 ratio: 1:1 versus 2:1
• TDP: 92 W versus 75 W
• Slot width: Dual-slot versus IGP
• Power connectors: 1x 8-pin versus none
• Suggested PSU: 250 W versus not listed
• Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x8
• Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a versus Portable Device Dependent
• Release date: 2026-07-27 versus 2023-07-31

Fields that are identical include texture rate (166.4 GTexel/s), ROPs (64), ray tracing cores (16), FP16 output (10.65 TFLOPS), DirectX support (12 Ultimate 12_2), OpenGL (4.6), Vulkan (1.4), and production status (Active). No launch MSRP is recorded for either product.

The Verdict

The database record shows a clear split between theoretical compute capability and measured benchmark data. The AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM offers much higher FP32 throughput at 10.65 TFLOPS, a faster boost clock at 2600 MHz, and a smaller, denser chip on a newer process. The Intel Arc A570M offers double the memory capacity at 8 GB, higher bandwidth at 224.0 GB/s, and a measured OpenCL score that places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs.

For the Intel Arc A570M, the recorded benchmark score of 58,239 in Geekbench OpenCL demonstrates that its real-world compute performance is competitive with desktop GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT and the NVIDIA P102-100, despite its lower clocks and older architecture. The delta percentages are all under 1%, so no meaningful performance gap exists among these four rivals. This makes the Arc A570M a strong compute performer for its class, even though its FP32 rating is only half of the AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM.

The AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM, however, has no benchmark entries in the database. Its compute specifications suggest a high level of theoretical performance, but without measured results, the database cannot confirm how that translates into actual workload execution. The 50th percentile placeholder is not a derived score, and the average benchmark score of 0 confirms the absence of logged tests.

Who should pick which depends on what the data supports. The Intel Arc A570M is the only one of the two with a verified performance record, so for users who prioritize a known benchmark result, the data favors Intel. The AMD Radeon RX 9050 OEM offers superior raw specifications in several areas, particularly FP32 throughput and clock speeds, but those specifications are unverified by any test in the database. The Intel part also provides more memory and higher bandwidth, which may benefit memory-intensive workloads. The AMD part has a higher TDP at 92 W versus 75 W, and requires a dual-slot form factor with an 8-pin connector and a 250 W suggested PSU, while the Intel part is an IGP with no external power requirements. The choice, strictly from the data, comes down to a verified performer with modest specs against a high-spec product without any recorded results.