AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison: the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has two benchmark entries in the database, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores at all. The RX 7650 GRE scores 2336 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) and 83109 in Geekbench OpenCL. The LX ULTRA shows zero entries for both tests, which places its average benchmark score at 0 and its percentile at 50 among all GPUs. The RX 7650 GRE, by contrast, holds an 83rd percentile ranking, indicating it outperforms roughly 83 percent of all recorded graphics cards in the database.

The average benchmark score for the RX 7650 GRE is 42723. The nearest rivals for the RX 7650 GRE include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (average score 43223, delta of -1.2 percent), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43262, -1.2 percent), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43268, -1.3 percent), and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43301, -1.3 percent). These deltas indicate the RX 7650 GRE trails each of these four cards by approximately 1.2 to 1.3 percent in average score, a narrow margin that places it just below a tight cluster of competing products. The LX ULTRA does not appear in any nearest rival list, and no head-to-head benchmark results exist between the two cards in the database.

Because the LX ULTRA has no recorded scores, the data cannot show a single direct performance comparison. The RX 7650 GRE delivers measurable results, while the LX ULTRA's entry remains empty of any test output. The percentile gap is stark: 83 for the RX 7650 GRE versus 50 for the LX ULTRA, a difference of 33 percentile points. The average score gap is equally decisive, with the RX 7650 GRE posting 42723 and the LX ULTRA posting 0. These figures suggest that, based solely on available database measurements, the RX 7650 GRE is the only one of the two with verified performance data, while the LX ULTRA has no empirical backing in this record.

The FP32 compute rates differ meaningfully. The RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS, while the LX ULTRA reaches 24.58 TFLOPS, a difference of 2.50 TFLOPS in favor of the LX ULTRA. The texture rates also favor the LX ULTRA: 384.0 GTexel/s versus 345.0 GTexel/s for the RX 7650 GRE, a gap of 39.0 GTexel/s. Pixel rates show the LX ULTRA ahead at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 172.5 GPixel/s, a difference of 19.5 GPixel/s. These raw throughput numbers suggest the LX ULTRA has higher theoretical compute capacity, yet no benchmark scores exist to confirm real-world performance. The RX 7650 GRE, despite lower theoretical rates, carries the only actual measurements in the database.

The Verdict

The data points clearly to the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE as the card with verified performance. It has two benchmark scores, an 83rd percentile ranking, and an average score of 42723. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no benchmark entries, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking that reflects its absence of data rather than proven capability. Any user selecting between these two based on the database would find the RX 7650 GRE the only option with empirical support.

The RX 7650 GRE also comes with a launch MSRP of 279 USD. The LX ULTRA has no launch MSRP field in the record. The RX 7650 GRE belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series from AMD, uses the Navi 33 chip on RDNA 3.0 architecture, and was released on 2025-02-06. The LX ULTRA is manufactured by an unknown company, uses the 7G105 chip on an architecture labeled TrueGPU, and has a release date of 2026-03-16. The production status for both is listed as active.

For users who prioritize verified results, the RX 7650 GRE is the clear choice. For users who value higher theoretical specifications, the LX ULTRA offers more memory, more shading units, and a wider memory bus, but those specifications come without any benchmark confirmation. The database shows no scenario where the LX ULTRA wins a measured test, because no tests were recorded for it. The verdict, strictly from the data, favors the RX 7650 GRE on evidence and the LX ULTRA only on paper.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42723, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The RX 7650 GRE ranks in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, while the LX ULTRA ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: How much memory does each card have?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 performance figures?

A: The RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS.

Q: Does the LX ULTRA have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No, the LX ULTRA has an empty benchmark list. It has no recorded scores in any test, including 3DMark Steel Nomad and Geekbench OpenCL, where the RX 7650 GRE has scores of 2336 and 83109, respectively.

Q: What power connectors and PSU requirements do the cards use?

A: The RX 7650 GRE uses a single 8-pin connector with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The LX ULTRA uses a single 16-pin connector with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every recorded specification. The RX 7650 GRE uses 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The LX ULTRA uses 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The RX 7650 GRE has 32 ray tracing cores; the LX ULTRA has no recorded ray tracing core count. Neither card lists tensor cores.

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6, a 128-bit bus, and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6, a 192-bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Memory clocks are identical at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The RX 7650 GRE supports PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX ULTRA supports PCIe 4.0 x16.

Power specifications differ. The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W, uses a single 8-pin connector, and suggests a 450 W PSU. The LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU. Both are dual-slot cards. The RX 7650 GRE measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height, with no width recorded. The LX ULTRA measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

Display outputs differ. The RX 7650 GRE offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The LX ULTRA offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. API support shows the RX 7650 GRE with Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA lists Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7650 GRE has a release date of 2025-02-06 and a launch MSRP of 279 USD. The LX ULTRA has a release date of 2026-03-16 and no recorded launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. The LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip on an architecture called TrueGPU, belonging to the 7G100 generation. Both cards are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The RX 7650 GRE has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, with a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The LX ULTRA has unknown transistor count, unknown die size, and no density figure.

The RX 7650 GRE lists a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no recorded base, boost, or game clocks. Memory clock for both is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. FP16 performance differs: the RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio to FP32, while the LX ULTRA delivers 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

The RX 7650 GRE has a predecessor in Navi II and a successor in Navi IV. The LX ULTRA has no predecessor or successor listed. The RX 7650 GRE comes from AMD, while the manufacturer of the LX ULTRA is listed as unknown. The RX 7650 GRE's architecture supports ray tracing cores (32 of them), while the LX ULTRA has no recorded ray tracing core count. The LX ULTRA does support DirectX 12 Ultimate, so ray tracing may be present, but the database does not specify a count. The RX 7650 GRE uses a 1x 8-pin power connector; the LX ULTRA uses a 1x 16-pin connector. The LX ULTRA also has a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface versus the RX 7650 GRE's PCIe 4.0 x8.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7650 GRE wins in every category with recorded measurements. It has benchmark scores in 3DMark Steel Nomad (2336) and Geekbench OpenCL (83109). It holds an 83rd percentile ranking versus 50th for the LX ULTRA. Its average benchmark score of 42723 contrasts with the LX ULTRA's 0. The RX 7650 GRE also wins on efficiency metrics: a lower TDP of 170 W versus 225 W, a lower PSU recommendation of 450 W versus 550 W, a smaller physical footprint at 204 mm length versus 268 mm, and a single 8-pin connector versus a 16-pin connector.

The LX ULTRA wins on raw hardware specifications. It has 6144 shading units versus 2048, 192 TMUs versus 128, 96 ROPs versus 64, 24 GB of memory versus 8 GB, a 192-bit bus versus 128-bit, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 288.0 GB/s. Its FP32 output of 24.58 TFLOPS exceeds the RX 7650 GRE's 22.08 TFLOPS. Its FP16 output of 49.15 TFLOPS more than doubles the RX 7650 GRE's 22.08 TFLOPS. Texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s) and pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s) also exceed the RX 7650 GRE's 345.0 GTexel/s and 172.5 GPixel/s.

The RX 7650 GRE wins on display connectivity with DisplayPort 2.1 and HDMI 2.1a, while the LX ULTRA offers only DisplayPort 1.4a. The LX ULTRA wins on memory capacity and bandwidth, making it suited for workloads that demand large frame buffers. The RX 7650 GRE wins on verified performance and lower power demands. For gaming with ray tracing, the RX 7650 GRE explicitly lists 32 ray tracing cores, while the LX ULTRA has no such count. The RX 7650 GRE also has a longer record in the database with a known release date and predecessor/successor lineage, whereas the LX ULTRA lacks those details. In the absence of LX ULTRA benchmark data, the RX 7650 GRE is the only card with demonstrated results, and the LX ULTRA remains a specification sheet without empirical confirmation.