AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data for these two GPUs is asymmetrical. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a substantial set of benchmark results, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores, no average score, and no rival comparisons. Based strictly on the database, the RX 7650 GRE holds an 83rd percentile position among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 42,723. The LX 7G100 sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0, which reflects the absence of any recorded performance data rather than a measured performance level.

The RX 7650 GRE delivers verified performance in two benchmark tests: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83,109. These results place it within 1.2% to 1.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000. For the LX 7G100, no comparable data exists, so any performance conclusion is unsupported by measurements.

For users selecting strictly from the data, the RX 7650 GRE is the only option with quantifiable performance. The LX 7G100 offers a larger memory pool, a wider memory bus, and higher theoretical compute rates, but none of these are validated by benchmark results. The data cannot confirm that the LX 7G100 outperforms or underperforms the RX 7650 GRE in any real workload. The verdict is that the RX 7650 GRE is the measurable choice, while the LX 7G100 remains an unverified alternative.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip with the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, belongs to the 7G100 generation, and also uses a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown.

The RX 7650 GRE includes 32 ray tracing cores, while the LX 7G100 lists no ray tracing core count. The LX 7G100 has no tensor core count listed, and the RX 7650 GRE also has no tensor cores. The RX 7650 GRE supports PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The RX 7650 GRE provides display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, whereas the LX 7G100 offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RX 7650 GRE supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

The RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no recorded base, boost, or game clock. Both use GDDR6 memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The RX 7650 GRE is a dual-slot card with a 1x 8-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The LX 7G100 is also dual-slot with a 1x 8-pin connector but requires a 550 W suggested PSU. The RX 7650 GRE is 204 mm long and 115 mm high, while the LX 7G100 is 294 mm long, 120 mm high, and 49 mm wide. The RX 7650 GRE was released on 2025-02-06, and the LX 7G100 was released on 2026-06-17. The RX 7650 GRE has a predecessor in Navi II and a successor in Navi IV, while the LX 7G100 has neither recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark section in the database contains no entries. The win counts for both GPUs are zero. Consequently, there are no direct comparison scores to walk through. The only performance data available is the RX 7650 GRE's individual benchmark results and its position relative to its nearest rivals.

The RX 7650 GRE scores 2,336 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 83,109 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its average benchmark score is 42,723. Against the nearest recorded rivals, the RX 7650 GRE trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER by 1.2%, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB by 1.2%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile by 1.3%, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 by 1.3%. These deltas are narrow, indicating the RX 7650 GRE operates in the same performance band as those four GPUs, with differences under two percentage points.

For the LX 7G100, the database records no benchmark scores, no average score, and no nearest rivals. The percentile rank of 50 is based on the absence of measured data, not on a comparison of actual results. Therefore, a head-to-head comparison cannot be constructed from the available facts. The RX 7650 GRE's measured wins are limited to its own benchmark completions, and no data indicates any win for the LX 7G100 in any test.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in several recorded specification fields. Memory size: the RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB, the LX 7G100 has 12 GB. Memory bus width: 128 bit versus 192 bit. Memory bandwidth: 288.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. Shading units: 2,048 versus 6,144. Texture mapping units: 128 versus 192. Render output units: 64 versus 96. Pixel rate: 172.5 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 345.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 compute: 22.08 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 compute: 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). TDP: 170 W versus 225 W. Suggested PSU: 450 W versus 550 W. Bus interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Vulkan version: 1.4 versus 1.3. Dimensions: 204 mm length, 115 mm height versus 294 mm length, 120 mm height, 49 mm width. Release date: 2025-02-06 versus 2026-06-17. Launch MSRP: the RX 7650 GRE has a launch MSRP of 279 USD, while the LX 7G100 has no recorded launch MSRP.

Fields where the two do not differ: process node (6 nm), foundry (TSMC), memory type (GDDR6), memory clock (2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective), slot width (dual-slot), power connector (1x 8-pin), DirectX support (12 Ultimate, 12_2), OpenGL support (4.6), and production status (Active). The RX 7650 GRE has recorded base, boost, and game clocks, while the LX 7G100 has none. The RX 7650 GRE has a known transistor count and die size, while the LX 7G100 does not. The RX 7650 GRE has ray tracing cores, while the LX 7G100 does not list any.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher measured average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42,723. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmark tests.

Q: How does the RX 7650 GRE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7650 GRE trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER by 1.2%, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB by 1.2%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile by 1.3%, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 by 1.3%.

Q: Does the LX 7G100 have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No. The LX 7G100 has an empty benchmarks array, no average score, and no nearest rivals. Its percentile rank of 50 reflects the absence of recorded performance data.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both use 2250 MHz memory with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Which GPU has higher theoretical FP32 compute?

A: The LX 7G100 has 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the RX 7650 GRE has 22.08 TFLOPS FP32. The LX 7G100 also has a higher FP16 rate at 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1), versus 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1) for the RX 7650 GRE.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RX 7650 GRE?

A: The launch MSRP of the RX 7650 GRE is 279 USD. The LX 7G100 has no recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7650 GRE wins in verified performance data. It has two recorded benchmark scores: 2,336 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 83,109 in Geekbench OpenCL. These results place it at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 42,723. Its nearest rivals are all within 1.3%, which indicates consistent performance across the tested workloads. The RX 7650 GRE also has a lower TDP at 170 W versus 225 W, a smaller physical footprint at 204 mm length versus 294 mm, and a lower suggested PSU at 450 W versus 550 W.

The LX 7G100 wins in several recorded specification fields. It has 12 GB of memory versus 8 GB, a 192 bit bus versus 128 bit, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 288.0 GB/s. It has 6,144 shading units versus 2,048, 192 TMUs versus 128, and 96 ROPs versus 64. Its pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 172.5 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 345.0 GTexel/s. Its FP32 compute is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 22.08 TFLOPS, and its FP16 compute is 49.15 TFLOPS versus 22.08 TFLOPS. The LX 7G100 also uses a wider PCIe interface at x16 versus x8.

The data does not show any benchmark win for the LX 7G100, since no benchmark was recorded. The RX 7650 GRE is the only GPU with measured performance, and its percentile rank of 83 confirms it sits well above the median in the database. The LX 7G100's percentile rank of 50 is not a measured performance level but a placeholder for missing data. For workloads that depend on memory capacity and bandwidth, the LX 7G100 has the specification advantage. For workloads that rely on validated benchmark performance, the RX 7650 GRE has the only recorded evidence. The absence of benchmark data for the LX 7G100 means its theoretical advantages remain unconfirmed in practice.