AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Intel Arc A550M Comparison

The Intel Arc A550M and AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE occupy different corners of the graphics market, and their benchmark results reflect that divide. The data shows a single head-to-head comparison in Geekbench OpenCL, where the AMD card decisively outperforms the Intel mobile part. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE scores 83,109 points, while the Intel Arc A550M trails at 49,894, a 40% deficit for the Intel GPU. This is a substantial gap, one that places the AMD card in a different performance tier despite the Intel part’s respectable 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The AMD card’s 83rd percentile, while slightly lower, is backed by a far higher raw score in this specific test, suggesting that the Intel part’s percentile is buoyed by its average across multiple benchmarks rather than peak OpenCL performance.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison available is the Geekbench OpenCL test, and it is a decisive victory for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE. The AMD card delivers 83,109 points against the Intel Arc A550M’s 49,894, yielding a delta of -40% for the Intel part. This is not a marginal win; it is a dominant one. The margin is larger than the difference between the Intel Arc A550M and its nearest rivals in the overall rankings. For context, the Intel Arc A550M’s average benchmark score of 49,737 places it just 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49,957) and 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50,001). Meanwhile, the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE’s average score of 42,723 is 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43,223). In the head-to-head OpenCL test, the AMD card is not merely ahead; it is ahead by a margin that dwarfs the differences seen among the Intel card’s closest competitors.

The Intel Arc A550M does have a consolation: its average benchmark score across all tests is higher than the AMD card’s. The Intel part averages 49,737, while the AMD part averages 42,723. However, this average is misleading when looking at raw compute workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL result suggests that in compute-heavy tasks, the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a significant advantage. The 40% delta in OpenCL is the single largest performance gap recorded between these two products in the data provided. It indicates that the AMD architecture’s design, with its higher clock speeds and compute throughput, translates directly into superior raw number-crunching ability. The Intel part, despite its higher transistor count, cannot match that output in this workload.

Looking at the rivals for each card underscores the nature of the competition. The Intel Arc A550M’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, both of which score within a few percentage points of the Intel part. This suggests the Intel GPU is competitive with high-end desktop cards from the previous generation. On the other side, the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE’s rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and the NVIDIA RTX 5050 Mobile, indicating it sits in a different, more modern performance bracket. The head-to-head result shows that when pitted directly against each other, the AMD card’s modern architecture wins decisively in OpenCL compute.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has a higher average benchmark score of 49,737, compared to the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE’s 42,723. However, this does not translate to a win in the direct Geekbench OpenCL comparison, where the AMD card leads by 40%.

Q: What is the performance difference in the Geekbench OpenCL test?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE scores 83,109, while the Intel Arc A550M scores 49,894. The AMD card is ahead by 40%, making it the clear winner in that specific benchmark.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A550M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc A550M is extremely close to its nearest rivals. It is 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49,957), 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50,001), and 2.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50,951). It is 2.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48,477).

Q: What is the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE’s standing among its rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE sits just below several NVIDIA cards. It is 1.2% behind both the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43,223) and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43,262), and 1.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43,268) and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43,301).

Q: Which GPU has a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has a higher percentile ranking, sitting at the 86th percentile, compared to the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE’s 83rd percentile. This indicates the Intel part is rated higher overall, despite losing the head-to-head test.

Q: How many benchmark wins does each GPU have in the head-to-head data?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has one win in the head-to-head benchmarks, while the Intel Arc A550M has zero wins. The sole test, Geekbench OpenCL, went to the AMD card.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures, which explains their divergent performance profiles. The Intel Arc A550M uses the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, part of the Alchemist generation for mobile. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, packing 21,700 million transistors onto a 406 mm² die. This results in a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, in contrast, uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed "Hotpink Bonefish." It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. It is also built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but with 13,300 million transistors on a much smaller 204 mm² die, achieving a higher transistor density of 65.2 million per mm².

The Intel chip’s larger die and higher transistor count do not translate to higher performance in the head-to-head test. Instead, the AMD architecture leverages its design more efficiently. The AMD card features 32 ray tracing cores, double the Intel card’s 16. The Intel card has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, while the AMD card runs at a 1720 MHz base and 2695 MHz boost, with a game clock of 2350 MHz. The AMD card’s significantly higher clock speeds are a major factor in its 40% OpenCL victory. The Intel card’s FP32 throughput is rated at 8.397 TFLOPS, while the AMD card delivers 22.08 TFLOPS, a massive difference. The FP16 performance also differs: the Intel card achieves 16.79 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, while the AMD card matches its FP32 at 22.08 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. This shows the AMD card is designed for balanced compute across precisions, while the Intel card prioritizes FP32.

The memory subsystems also differ. Both cards have 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, but the AMD card runs its memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel card runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), providing 224.0 GB/s. This 28.6% bandwidth advantage for the AMD card contributes to its compute lead. The pixel rate and texture rate tell a similar story: the AMD card achieves 172.5 GPixel/s and 345.0 GTexel/s, while the Intel card manages 131.2 GPixel/s and 262.4 GTexel/s. The AMD card’s architecture is simply more efficient per transistor, and the clock speed advantage amplifies that efficiency.

The power envelopes are drastically different. The Intel Arc A550M has a TDP of 60 W, making it a low-power mobile part, while the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W. This higher power budget allows the AMD card to sustain its higher clocks and performance. The Intel card is an IGP form factor, while the AMD card is a dual-slot design with a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The AMD card is also an active production part, released on 2025-02-06, while the Intel card is end-of-life. The AMD card’s architecture, built for desktop performance with a higher power ceiling, is the clear reason for its benchmark dominance.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every measurable specification, with the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE being the more powerful and modern part. The most significant difference is in clock speeds: the Intel Arc A550M has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost of 2050 MHz, while the AMD card has a 1720 MHz base and a 2695 MHz boost. The AMD card also has a specified game clock of 2350 MHz, which the Intel card lacks entirely. The memory clocks differ as well, with the Intel card at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus the AMD card’s 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This leads to a bandwidth difference of 224.0 GB/s for the Intel card versus 288.0 GB/s for the AMD card.

The compute capabilities are starkly different. The Intel Arc A550M has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 16 ray tracing cores. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE also has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, but doubles the ray tracing cores to 32. The FP32 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS for the Intel card and 22.08 TFLOPS for the AMD card. The FP16 performance is 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1) for Intel and 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1) for AMD. Pixel rates are 131.2 GPixel/s for Intel and 172.5 GPixel/s for AMD; texture rates are 262.4 GTexel/s and 345.0 GTexel/s, respectively. The AMD card is faster in every throughput metric.

The physical and power characteristics diverge sharply. The Intel part has a TDP of 60 W and an IGP slot width, while the AMD card has a 170 W TDP and is dual-slot. The AMD card requires a 1x 8-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested PSU, whereas the Intel card has no power connector specified. The bus interface differs: the Intel card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The display outputs are also different, with the Intel card being portable device dependent and the AMD card featuring 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The AMD card has defined dimensions of 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height, while the Intel card has no listed dimensions. The production statuses are opposite: the Intel card is end-of-life, and the AMD card is active. The AMD card has a launch date of 2025-02-06 and a launch MSRP of 279 USD.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the clear winner in raw compute performance, as evidenced by its 40% lead in the Geekbench OpenCL test. This makes it the better choice for workloads that rely heavily on general-purpose compute, such as GPU-accelerated rendering, scientific simulations, or machine learning inference. Its higher clock speeds, doubled ray tracing cores, and 28.6% memory bandwidth advantage all contribute to this dominance. The AMD card also wins on connectivity, offering dedicated display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1) versus the Intel card’s portable device dependent outputs, making it more suitable for desktop setups with multiple monitors. Its 32 ray tracing cores, double the Intel card’s count, suggest superior ray-traced gaming performance, though no direct gaming benchmarks are provided.

The Intel Arc A550M wins on efficiency and integration. With a 60 W TDP versus the AMD card’s 170 W, the Intel part is designed for mobile platforms where power draw is critical. Its IGP form factor means it is integrated into a system, likely a laptop, without the need for a separate power connector. The Intel card also has a higher average benchmark score of 49,737, which indicates that across a broader range of tests, it performs better than the AMD card’s average of 42,723. This suggests that while the AMD card excels in the specific OpenCL workload, the Intel card may be more balanced in other, unmeasured tasks. The Intel card’s 86th percentile ranking, compared to the AMD card’s 83rd, reinforces the idea that it is a more well-rounded performer in the aggregate.

In terms of use-case scenarios, the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the pick for a desktop gamer or content creator who needs maximum compute throughput and does not mind the higher power draw. Its 170 W TDP and dual-slot design are acceptable for a desktop chassis, and its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with higher bandwidth will handle modern games and compute tasks better. The Intel Arc A550M is the pick for a thin-and-light laptop user who prioritizes battery life over peak performance. Its 60 W TDP and lack of external power connectors make it a low-drain option. The data shows a clear trade-off: the AMD card wins on raw speed, while the Intel card wins on operational efficiency and overall percentile ranking. The choice depends entirely on whether the user values compute power or power economy.