AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has a full set of ten benchmark results, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA currently has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the win counts for both items stand at zero. This means a direct numerical comparison of performance scores is impossible at this time.

What the data does show is the RX 7600S's position among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 16696, placing it in the 60th percentile of all GPUs tracked. The nearest rivals for the RX 7600S are the NVIDIA T400 4 GB with an average score of 16792, which is 0.6% ahead, and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 at 16932, which is 1.4% ahead. On the other side, the NVIDIA T400 scores 16508, which is 1.1% behind the RX 7600S, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504, which is 1.2% behind. These deltas are all very small, within a range of roughly 1.4% ahead to 1.2% behind, indicating the RX 7600S sits in a tightly contested performance cluster.

The RX 7600S delivers specific scores across different APIs. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 73868, and in Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 68012. The PassMark G3D score is 15408, while the PassMark GPU Compute score is 6520. The DirectX-focused PassMark tests show lower numbers: DirectX 11 scores 140, DirectX 9 scores 211, DirectX 10 scores 74, and DirectX 12 scores 65. The PassMark G2D score is 776. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 1888.

For the LX ULTRA, the benchmark array is empty, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0. Its percentile versus all GPUs is listed at 50, but without actual scores, this percentile has no supporting measurement data. The database cannot currently verify how the LX ULTRA performs in any workload.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the available data, the RX 7600S wins in every measurable benchmark category simply because it has recorded scores and the LX ULTRA does not. The RX 7600S shows particular strength in Vulkan and OpenCL compute workloads, as indicated by its Geekbench scores of 73868 and 68012 respectively. For general 3D graphics, the PassMark G3D score of 15408 provides a reference point. The DirectX 9 score of 211 is notably higher than the DirectX 10 score of 74 and DirectX 12 score of 65, which suggests the architecture may have varying efficiency across different API generations.

The LX ULTRA cannot be assigned wins in any category from the current data. Its hardware specifications suggest it has considerably more raw resources, but without benchmark results, any performance advantage remains unverified. The database records no wins for either item, so a use-case split based on benchmark wins is not possible from measurements alone.

The RX 7600S's 60th percentile ranking indicates it outperforms a majority of all GPUs in the database, but its nearest rivals show that the margin is thin. The NVIDIA T400 4 GB and NVIDIA Tesla M4 both sit slightly ahead, while the NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 sit slightly behind. This clustering suggests the RX 7600S delivers competitive but not dominant performance in its segment.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA have any benchmark scores?

A: No. The database shows an empty benchmark array for the LX ULTRA, with an average benchmark score of 0. The head-to-head benchmark table between the RX 7600S and LX ULTRA is also empty, and both items show zero wins.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7600S compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7600S has an average benchmark score of 16696. The NVIDIA T400 4 GB scores 16792, which is 0.6% ahead. The NVIDIA Tesla M4 scores 16932, which is 1.4% ahead. The NVIDIA T400 scores 16508, which is 1.1% behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504, which is 1.2% behind.

Q: What is the RX 7600S's best performing benchmark?

A: The highest recorded score for the RX 7600S is in Geekbench Vulkan at 73868, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 68012. The PassMark G3D score is 15408, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1888.

Q: What memory configuration does the LX ULTRA have?

A: The LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed as 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The RX 7600S is in the 60th percentile of all GPUs. The LX ULTRA is listed in the 50th percentile, but its average benchmark score is 0, so this ranking lacks supporting measurement data.

Q: What are the DirectX performance scores for the RX 7600S?

A: The PassMark DirectX scores for the RX 7600S are: DirectX 9 at 211, DirectX 11 at 140, DirectX 10 at 74, and DirectX 12 at 65.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification category. The RX 7600S uses the Navi 33 chip from the Radeon RX 7000 series, while the LX ULTRA uses a chip designated 7G105. The RX 7600S has a boost clock of 2200 MHz and a game clock of 1865 MHz, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded base, boost, or game clocks. Memory clocks differ: the RX 7600S memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective, while the LX ULTRA memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory capacity and bandwidth differ substantially. The RX 7600S has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 7600S has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations pipelines. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operations pipelines. The RX 7600S has 28 ray tracing cores, while the LX ULTRA has no ray tracing cores listed.

Pixel and texture rates differ as well. The RX 7600S delivers 140.8 GPixel/s and 246.4 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. Floating point performance shows the LX ULTRA at 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, versus the RX 7600S at 15.77 TFLOPS FP32 and 31.54 TFLOPS FP16. Power draw differs sharply: the RX 7600S has a TDP of 75 W, while the LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W. The RX 7600S uses no power connectors and is an integrated graphics product, while the LX ULTRA is a dual-slot card requiring a 1x 16-pin connector and a 550 W suggested power supply.

Physical dimensions exist only for the LX ULTRA: 268 mm length, 112 mm height, and 40 mm width. The RX 7600S has no recorded dimensions. Display outputs differ: the RX 7600S is listed as portable device dependent, while the LX ULTRA has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RX 7600S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. Release dates differ: the RX 7600S launched on 2023-01-03, and the LX ULTRA launched on 2026-03-16.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7600S uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename Hotpink Bonefish, belonging to the Navi Mobile generation (RX 7000M). The LX ULTRA uses an architecture called TrueGPU, belonging to the 7G100 generation. Both are built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The RX 7600S has a die size of 204 mm² and contains 13,300 million transistors, with a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The LX ULTRA has no recorded die size or transistor count in the database.

The RX 7600S's predecessor is Polaris Mobile, and it has no successor listed. The LX ULTRA has no predecessor or successor recorded. The RX 7600S is part of the Radeon RX 7000 series, while the LX ULTRA has no series designation. The RX 7600S is manufactured by AMD, while the LX ULTRA's manufacturer is listed as unknown.

The RX 7600S supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX ULTRA supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. Both use a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. The RX 7600S is listed as an IGP slot width with no power connectors, while the LX ULTRA is a dual-slot card with a 1x 16-pin power connector. The production status for both is listed as active.

The ray tracing capability differs significantly. The RX 7600S explicitly lists 28 ray tracing cores, while the LX ULTRA has no ray tracing cores recorded. The shading unit count also differs by a large margin: the LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units versus 1792 for the RX 7600S. The LX ULTRA's texture mapping units at 192 are nearly double the RX 7600S's 112, and its raster operations pipelines at 96 exceed the RX 7600S's 64.

The LX ULTRA's memory subsystem is larger in every respect: 24 GB versus 8 GB capacity, 192-bit versus 128-bit bus width, and 432.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The FP32 throughput of the LX ULTRA is 24.58 TFLOPS, which is 55.8% higher than the RX 7600S's 15.77 TFLOPS. The FP16 throughput follows the same ratio, with the LX ULTRA at 49.15 TFLOPS and the RX 7600S at 31.54 TFLOPS.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear situation: the AMD Radeon RX 7600S has extensive benchmark measurements, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has none. Any decision between these two must account for this asymmetry. The RX 7600S's scores are verified and place it in the 60th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16696. Its nearest rivals are all within a narrow band of 1.4% ahead to 1.2% behind, which indicates consistent, mid-tier performance.

The LX ULTRA's hardware specifications are substantially larger in almost every category. It has 24 GB of memory versus 8 GB, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 256.0 GB/s, 6144 shading units versus 1792, and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 15.77 TFLOPS. Its TDP of 225 W is three times the RX 7600S's 75 W. These specifications suggest a much higher theoretical ceiling, but the database contains no measurements to confirm actual performance.

For users who require verified performance data, the RX 7600S is the only option with recorded results. Its 60th percentile ranking and competitive standing against the NVIDIA T400 series and NVIDIA Tesla M4 provide concrete reference points. The LX ULTRA, despite its larger specifications, offers no benchmark evidence in the database. Its 50th percentile listing carries no weight without supporting scores.

The RX 7600S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600S's lower power draw and integrated nature suit portable devices, while the LX ULTRA's dual-slot design with a 550 W suggested power supply and 1x 16-pin connector indicates a desktop-oriented product. The choice between them depends entirely on whether the user prioritizes verified performance or unverified raw specifications.