AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has recorded benchmark results across a broad suite of tests, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 currently has no benchmark scores logged in the database. This makes a direct comparison of measured performance impossible at this time. The data that exists for the RX 7600S, however, places it in a specific performance context.

The RX 7600S achieves an average benchmark score of 16696 across all recorded tests. This places it at the 60th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its closest measured rival is the NVIDIA T400 4 GB, which scores 16792, a difference of 0.6% in favor of the NVIDIA card. The RX 7600S is 1.1% ahead of the standard NVIDIA T400, which scores 16508, and 1.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, which scores 16504. Against the NVIDIA Tesla M4, the RX 7600S trails by 1.4%, as the Tesla M4 scores 16932.

Looking at specific workloads, the RX 7600S shows its strongest result in Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 73868. Its OpenCL score in Geekbench is 68012. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it records 1888 points. The Passmark suite shows a G3D score of 15408, a GPU Compute score of 6520, and a G2D score of 776. Its legacy DirectX performance is more modest, with DirectX 9 scoring 211, DirectX 11 scoring 140, DirectX 10 scoring 74, and DirectX 12 scoring 65.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores. Its percentile rank is listed at 50, but this is not derived from any measured performance data. The absence of scores means the database cannot currently confirm any performance relationship between these two cards. Any head-to-head analysis must therefore rely on architectural specifications, which are substantial and point to very different design goals.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600S is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 33 chip with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation, part of the RX 7000M family. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a completely different architecture called TrueGPU, based on the 7G106 chip, and belongs to the 7G100 generation. There is no codename listed for the Lisuan part.

Both GPUs are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The RX 7600S contains 13,300 million transistors on a die size of 204 mm², resulting in a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has unknown transistor count and die size, with no density figure recorded.

The compute resources differ dramatically. The RX 7600S has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It also includes 28 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is far larger in this regard, with 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It has no listed ray tracing cores, which suggests the TrueGPU architecture does not expose them in the same way as RDNA 3.0.

Memory configurations also diverge sharply. The RX 7600S uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock is 2000 MHz, with 16 Gbps effective speed. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock is 2250 MHz, with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The compute throughput figures reflect the hardware differences. The RX 7600S delivers 15.77 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 31.54 TFLOPS of FP16 performance with a 2:1 ratio. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16, also at a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate for the RX 7600S is 140.8 GPixel/s, while the Lisuan card achieves 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate for the RX 7600S is 246.4 GTexel/s, versus 384.0 GTexel/s for the Lisuan card.

API support is similar but not identical. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3, an older version of the API specification.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has significantly higher memory bandwidth at 432.0 GB/s, compared to 256.0 GB/s for the AMD Radeon RX 7600S. This comes from a wider 192-bit bus and faster 18 Gbps effective memory speed versus the 128-bit bus and 16 Gbps effective speed of the RX 7600S.

Q: How do the FP32 compute performances compare?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is substantially higher than the 15.77 TFLOPS of the AMD Radeon RX 7600S. The Lisuan card also leads in FP16 with 49.15 TFLOPS versus 31.54 TFLOPS.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has a TDP of 75 W and requires no external power connectors, as it is designed as an integrated graphics processor. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 support ray tracing?

A: The database lists no ray tracing cores for the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S, by contrast, includes 28 ray tracing cores. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, but the absence of dedicated RT cores on the Lisuan card indicates a different hardware approach.

Q: What is the physical size difference between the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S is an integrated graphics processor with no specified dimensions. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card measuring 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width.

Q: Which GPU has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S is at the 60th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a listed percentile of 50, but this is not supported by any benchmark scores, as its average benchmark score is currently 0.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the AMD Radeon RX 7600S and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100:

• Architecture: RDNA 3.0 versus TrueGPU
• Chip: Navi 33 versus 7G106
• Codename: Hotpink Bonefish versus none listed
• Generation: Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) versus 7G100
• Transistors: 13,300 million versus unknown
• Die Size: 204 mm² versus unknown
• Transistor Density: 65.2M / mm² versus not listed
• Base Clock: 1500 MHz versus not listed
• Boost Clock: 2200 MHz versus not listed
• Game Clock: 1865 MHz versus not listed
• Memory Clock: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective)
• Memory Size: 8 GB versus 12 GB
• Memory Bus Width: 128 bit versus 192 bit
• Memory Bandwidth: 256.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s
• Shading Units: 1792 versus 6144
• TMUs: 112 versus 192
• ROPs: 64 versus 96
• RT Cores: 28 versus none listed
• Pixel Rate: 140.8 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 246.4 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s
• FP32 Performance: 15.77 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS
• FP16 Performance: 31.54 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS
• TDP: 75 W versus 225 W
• Slot Width: IGP versus Dual-slot
• Power Connectors: None versus 1x 8-pin
• Suggested PSU: Not listed versus 550 W
• Display Outputs: Portable Device Dependent versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
• Vulkan Support: 1.4 versus 1.3
• Release Date: 2023-01-03 versus 2026-06-17
• Dimensions: Not listed versus 294 mm x 120 mm x 49 mm
• Benchmark Scores: Multiple recorded scores versus none
• Average Benchmark Score: 16696 versus 0
• Percentile: 60 versus 50

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600S wins wherever measured performance is the criterion, simply because it has recorded data and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 does not. Every benchmark in the database, from 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 to the full Passmark suite, shows a score for the RX 7600S. Its 60th percentile ranking and average score of 16696 give it a concrete position in the performance hierarchy. The nearest rival data shows it trading blows with the NVIDIA T400 4 GB, the NVIDIA T400, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, and the NVIDIA Tesla M4, all within a 1.4% margin.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins on raw specification sheet comparisons. Its 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs are far higher than the RX 7600S counts. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is more than 50% higher than the RX 7600S figure. Its 12 GB memory capacity and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are both materially larger. Its 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate also exceed the RX 7600S.

The architecture differences point to distinct use cases. The RX 7600S is a low-power integrated GPU with a 75 W TDP, designed for portable devices with no external power connector. Its 28 ray tracing cores and Vulkan 1.4 support indicate a focus on modern graphics features within a constrained power envelope. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a dual-slot discrete card with a 225 W TDP, requiring a 550 W suggested PSU and a single 8-pin connector. Its larger memory pool and wider bus suggest it targets workloads that benefit from high bandwidth and capacity, such as large texture sets or compute tasks.

The data shows that the RX 7600S is a proven, measured product with a clear performance profile. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, despite its substantial theoretical specifications, has no benchmark presence in the database, making its real-world performance unverified. Until benchmark scores are recorded for the Lisuan card, the RX 7600S remains the only one of the two with a confirmed performance footprint.