AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7600M and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The database contains only one benchmark entry for the RX 7600M, and no benchmark scores at all for the LX ULTRA. The RX 7600M posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775, placing it in the 89th percentile among all GPUs. The LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores, sits in the 50th percentile, and shows an average benchmark score of 0. This makes direct numerical comparison impossible based on available measurements.

The RX 7600M's nearest rivals provide context for its single benchmark result. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63830, which is 0.1% higher than the RX 7600M. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX scores 63842, also 0.1% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693, which is 0.1% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 64212, which is 0.7% higher. These narrow deltas indicate the RX 7600M sits in a tightly competitive performance cluster. The LX ULTRA has no such rival data, so its relative position cannot be established from the database.

Without a shared benchmark suite, the only quantitative comparison comes from theoretical specifications. The LX ULTRA lists an FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS, while the RX 7600M lists 17.27 TFLOPS. The LX ULTRA therefore claims roughly 42% higher raw FP32 compute on paper. Its FP16 output of 49.15 TFLOPS compares to the RX 7600M's 34.55 TFLOPS, a difference of approximately 42% as well. These figures represent peak theoretical rates, not measured application performance, so they should not be read as expected real-world deltas.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge sharply in their internal designs. The RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation within the RX 7000M series. The LX ULTRA uses a chip labeled 7G105, built on an architecture called TrueGPU, and belongs to the 7G100 generation. Both are manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, so the underlying fabrication node is identical.

Transistor counts and die sizes differ in data availability. The RX 7600M contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The LX ULTRA has no recorded transistor count, die size, or density in the database. This lack of data prevents any comparison of physical design efficiency between the two.

Memory configurations diverge substantially. The RX 7600M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The LX ULTRA offers three times the capacity and roughly 69% more bandwidth. The wider 192-bit bus and faster memory clocks account for the bandwidth advantage.

Compute unit counts scale in the LX ULTRA's favor. The RX 7600M has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. That is approximately 3.4 times more shading units, 1.7 times more TMUs, and 1.5 times more ROPs. The LX ULTRA also lists higher pixel and texture rates: 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s versus the RX 7600M's 154.2 GPixel/s and 269.9 GTexel/s. These differences align with the larger memory bus and higher compute throughput of the LX ULTRA.

Ray tracing hardware is present only in the RX 7600M. It carries 28 ray tracing cores, while the LX ULTRA lists no RT core count. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. The RX 7600M is an integrated form factor, listed as IGP with no power connectors and no suggested PSU. The LX ULTRA is a dual-slot discrete card measuring 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, requiring one 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU.

Power consumption differs by a wide margin. The RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W. The LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W. That is a 135 W difference, which correlates with the LX ULTRA's larger memory pool, higher compute throughput, and physically larger cooling solution. The LX ULTRA uses four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the RX 7600M's display outputs are portable-device dependent, reflecting its integrated mobile positioning.

Release dates sit far apart. The RX 7600M launched on January 3, 2023. The LX ULTRA launched on March 16, 2026. Both are marked as Active in production status. The RX 7600M lists Polaris Mobile as its predecessor and has no successor recorded. The LX ULTRA lists no predecessor or successor.

The Verdict

The data supports different conclusions depending on the use case. For measured performance, the RX 7600M has the only benchmark score in the database: 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. The LX ULTRA has no benchmark scores and sits in the 50th percentile with an average score of 0. On recorded data alone, the RX 7600M is the only one with verified performance.

For raw theoretical compute, the LX ULTRA holds the advantage. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 figures exceed the RX 7600M's 17.27 TFLOPS and 34.55 TFLOPS by roughly 42%. Its 24 GB memory capacity and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth far exceed the RX 7600M's 8 GB and 256.0 GB/s. These specifications suit workloads that demand large memory footprints or high peak throughput, provided the 225 W TDP and dual-slot physical footprint are acceptable.

For ray tracing, the RX 7600M is the only option with dedicated RT cores. Its 28 RT cores give it a feature the LX ULTRA does not list. The RX 7600M also supports Vulkan 1.4 versus the LX ULTRA's 1.3. The RX 7600M runs at 90 W TDP, making it suitable for integrated mobile designs, while the LX ULTRA requires a discrete power connection and a 550 W suggested PSU.

The RX 7600M competes within 0.7% of GPUs like the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 and within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP and NVIDIA CMP 30HX. The LX ULTRA has no comparable positions in the database. Users who prioritize verified benchmark results and ray tracing support should choose the RX 7600M. Users who prioritize memory capacity, bandwidth, and theoretical compute should choose the LX ULTRA, accepting the higher power draw and lack of benchmark verification.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: Only the AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a recorded Geekbench OpenCL score in the database, at 63775. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA lists 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600M lists 17.27 TFLOPS. The LX ULTRA is about 42% higher on paper.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA support ray tracing?

A: The database lists no ray tracing cores for the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M lists 28 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W.

Q: Which GPU has a larger physical footprint?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is a dual-slot card measuring 268 mm by 112 mm by 40 mm. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is listed as IGP form factor with portable-device-dependent display outputs.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600M wins in verified performance data. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 places it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, while the LX ULTRA has no scores and sits in the 50th percentile. The RX 7600M also wins on ray tracing capability with 28 RT cores, and on API support with Vulkan 1.4 versus the LX ULTRA's Vulkan 1.3. Its 90 W TDP makes it the lower-power option by 135 W, and its IGP form factor with no power connectors suits compact mobile platforms.

The LX ULTRA wins on memory and compute specifications. Its 24 GB GDDR6 capacity is three times the RX 7600M's 8 GB. Its 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is roughly 69% higher than 256.0 GB/s. Its 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs exceed the RX 7600M's 1792, 112, and 64 respectively. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 are about 42% higher than the RX 7600M's 17.27 and 34.55 TFLOPS. Its 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate exceed the RX 7600M's 154.2 and 269.9. The LX ULTRA also provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the RX 7600M's outputs depend on the portable device.

For workloads that rely on measured OpenCL performance or ray tracing, the RX 7600M delivers the only verified results. For workloads that demand large memory capacity, high bandwidth, or maximum theoretical throughput, the LX ULTRA offers the stronger specification sheet. The absence of LX ULTRA benchmark data means its real-world performance remains unverified, while the RX 7600M's single benchmark ties it closely to rivals within 0.7% of its score. The choice between the two comes down to whether verified measurements or raw specifications matter more for the intended use.