AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 occupy opposite ends of the mobile and desktop GPU spectrum. The RX 7600M is a 90 W integrated-class mobile part designed for thin, portable systems, while the LX 7G100 is a 225 W dual-slot desktop card with a 550 W suggested power supply and a 294 mm length. The data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the two, so the comparison rests on their recorded specifications and the RX 7600M's single OpenCL score.

The RX 7600M delivers an average benchmark score of 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. That score sits within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100, within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, and 0.1% below both the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP and the NVIDIA CMP 30HX. The LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores, an average score of zero, and a 50th percentile placement, which means its actual performance cannot be quantified from the database. Without measured results, the LX 7G100 cannot be positioned against the RX 7600M in any meaningful performance ranking.

The RX 7600M is the sensible choice for a laptop or compact system where power draw and physical footprint matter. Its 90 W TDP, IGP slot width, and no power connectors make it a drop-in part for portable designs. The LX 7G100 is a desktop-only card for a full tower with a 550 W power supply recommendation, a single 8-pin connector, and a 294 mm length. The two products do not compete in the same form factor, and the database does not provide enough evidence to declare a performance winner.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation (RX 7000M) and sits in the Radeon RX 7000 series. The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip built on TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. Both chips are manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process node, which is the only major manufacturing similarity.

The RX 7600M integrates 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The LX 7G100 has no listed transistor count, die size, or density, so those figures cannot be compared. The RX 7600M has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, which are substantially higher counts on every front.

Ray tracing support differs. The RX 7600M includes 28 dedicated ray tracing cores, while the LX 7G100 has no listed ray tracing cores. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7600M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. The LX 7G100 uses four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the RX 7600M's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, reflecting its mobile nature.

The RX 7600M has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2410 MHz, and a game clock of 2070 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no base, boost, or game clock listed. The RX 7600M's memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, while the LX 7G100 runs memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The LX 7G100's memory configuration is larger: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus versus 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus for the RX 7600M.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more memory?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus, while the AMD Radeon RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus. The LX 7G100 also has higher memory bandwidth at 432.0 GB/s compared to 256.0 GB/s for the RX 7600M.

Q: What is the performance ranking of the RX 7600M?

A: The RX 7600M scores 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL and ranks in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP at 63830 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA CMP 30HX at 63842 (0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63693 (0.1% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 at 64212 (0.7% higher).

Q: Does the LX 7G100 have any benchmark results?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark scores for the LX 7G100. Its average benchmark score is zero, and its percentile placement is 50th, which cannot be interpreted as a performance result without measured data.

Q: What power delivery does each card require?

A: The RX 7600M has a 90 W TDP, uses no power connectors, and has an IGP slot width. The LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, requires a single 8-pin power connector, is a dual-slot card, and lists a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: Which card is newer?

A: The RX 7600M has a release date of January 3, 2023. The LX 7G100 has a release date of June 17, 2026. The LX 7G100 is the later release.

Q: What are the physical dimensions of the LX 7G100?

A: The LX 7G100 measures 294 mm in length (11.6 inches), 120 mm in height (4.7 inches), and 49 mm in width (1.9 inches). The RX 7600M has no listed dimensions.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification. The RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture. The RX 7600M has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die; the LX 7G100 has unknown transistor count and die size.

The RX 7600M operates at a 90 W TDP and uses no power connectors. The LX 7G100 operates at a 225 W TDP and requires one 8-pin power connector, with a 550 W suggested power supply. The RX 7600M is an IGP slot width, while the LX 7G100 is dual-slot. The RX 7600M has no listed dimensions; the LX 7G100 is 294 mm long, 120 mm tall, and 49 mm wide.

Compute units differ sharply. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RX 7600M has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The RX 7600M includes 28 ray tracing cores; the LX 7G100 has none listed. The RX 7600M supports Vulkan 1.4; the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Memory specifications favor the LX 7G100. It has 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 2250 MHz memory clock (18 Gbps effective). The RX 7600M has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 2000 MHz memory clock (16 Gbps effective).

Clock speeds are only listed for the RX 7600M: 1500 MHz base, 2410 MHz boost, and 2070 MHz game clock. The LX 7G100 has no base, boost, or game clock data. Pixel rate favors the LX 7G100 at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 154.2 GPixel/s. Texture rate favors the LX 7G100 at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 269.9 GTexel/s. FP32 compute favors the LX 7G100 at 24.58 TFLOPS versus 17.27 TFLOPS. FP16 compute favors the LX 7G100 at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 34.55 TFLOPS. Both cards use PCIe 4.0 x16. The RX 7600M has portable device dependent display outputs; the LX 7G100 has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between the RX 7600M and the LX 7G100. The winsA and winsB counters are both zero, and the headToHeadBenchmarks list is empty. The only benchmark score available is the RX 7600M's Geekbench OpenCL result of 63775, which places it in the 89th percentile. The LX 7G100 has no scores, an average of zero, and a 50th percentile placement that reflects missing data rather than a measured result.

The RX 7600M's score can be interpreted through its nearest rivals. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP by 0.1% (63830 versus 63775) and the NVIDIA CMP 30HX by 0.1% (63842 versus 63775). It leads the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 0.1% (63693 versus 63775) and trails the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 by 0.7% (64212 versus 63775). This cluster of results shows the RX 7600M performing within a narrow band around 63775, with all four rivals within 0.7% of its score.

The LX 7G100's theoretical compute advantages are large on paper. Its FP32 rate of 24.58 TFLOPS is 42.3% higher than the RX 7600M's 17.27 TFLOPS. Its FP16 rate of 49.15 TFLOPS is 42.3% higher than the RX 7600M's 34.55 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is 42.3% higher than 269.9 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is 24.5% higher than 154.2 GPixel/s. Its memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is 68.8% higher than 256.0 GB/s. These deltas are calculated from the listed specifications, not from benchmark runs, and the absence of measured LX 7G100 scores means those numbers cannot be confirmed in practice.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600M wins on portability and efficiency. It draws 90 W, uses no power connectors, fits an IGP slot width, and has no listed dimensions, which matches a thin laptop or a compact embedded design. Its 28 ray tracing cores give it a feature that the LX 7G100 does not list. Its Vulkan 1.4 support is a newer API version than the LX 7G100's Vulkan 1.3. Its release date of January 3, 2023 makes it the earlier product, but its production status is Active. The RX 7600M is the only one of the two with a recorded benchmark score, so it is the only one whose real-world performance can be verified from the database.

The LX 7G100 wins on raw specification counts. It has 6144 shading units versus 1792, 192 TMUs versus 112, and 96 ROPs versus 64. It has 12 GB of memory versus 8 GB, a 192 bit bus versus 128 bit, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 256.0 GB/s. Its FP32 output of 24.58 TFLOPS exceeds the RX 7600M's 17.27 TFLOPS, and its FP16 output of 49.15 TFLOPS exceeds 34.55 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s are both higher than the RX 7600M's 269.9 GTexel/s and 154.2 GPixel/s. The LX 7G100 is a dual-slot desktop card with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, a 294 mm length, and a 550 W suggested power supply, which positions it for a full-size desktop workstation rather than a portable system.

The database does not provide enough evidence to assign a workload-specific winner. The LX 7G100's higher shading unit count, memory capacity, and bandwidth suggest it is built for higher resolution and heavier texture workloads, but no benchmark data supports that conclusion. The RX 7600M's 89th percentile ranking and 63775 OpenCL score confirm it is a competent mobile GPU, but the LX 7G100 has no comparable measurement. The practical split is form factor: the RX 7600M belongs in portable systems, and the LX 7G100 belongs in a desktop with a 550 W power supply. The data cannot determine which GPU is faster in actual applications.