AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has a full set of benchmark results, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmarks, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentile rank of 50 versus all GPUs. The AMD card sits at the 59th percentile. The database shows the Radeon PRO W7500 with an average benchmark score of 16415, placing it within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and 0.4% of the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M. It is effectively tied with the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at a delta of 0%. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA cannot be positioned against these results because no benchmark data exists for it.

For users selecting between these two, the data supports the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 for any workload where measured performance matters. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA offers a larger memory pool of 24 GB compared to 8 GB, along with higher raw compute specifications, but none of that is confirmed by benchmark scores. The decision rests on whether unverified specifications outweigh documented performance. The database indicates the AMD card is an active product with a launch MSRP of 429 USD, while the LX ULTRA has no launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. The process node is 6 nm at TSMC, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses a 7G105 chip on an architecture called TrueGPU, from the 7G100 generation. It is also built on a 6 nm TSMC process, but the transistor count and die size are listed as unknown. Both cards share the same process node and foundry, which suggests similar manufacturing maturity, but the AMD card has fully disclosed physical characteristics while the LX ULTRA does not.

The AMD card has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It includes 28 ray tracing cores. The LX ULTRA lists 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing core count recorded. This represents a 3.4x difference in shading units, a 1.7x difference in TMUs, and a 1.5x difference in ROPs, all in favor of the LX ULTRA. The LX ULTRA also has no tensor core data, matching the AMD card which lists no tensor cores either. The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX ULTRA supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but Vulkan is listed at 1.3, one version lower.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two products. The wins counter shows 0 for both the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. This absence of direct comparison data means no benchmark-based verdict can be issued for one card defeating the other in specific tests. The AMD card does have standalone benchmark results that can be examined. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 58213. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 68634. The Passmark suite shows a DirectX 10 score of 65, DirectX 11 score of 125, DirectX 12 score of 46, and DirectX 9 score of 200. The G2D score is 1174, the G3D score is 13368, and the GPU compute score is 5910.

The LX ULTRA has no benchmark scores recorded at all. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, which is lower than the AMD card's 59th percentile. The nearest rivals for the AMD card show it is tightly clustered with several other GPUs. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has an average score of 16408 with a delta of 0%. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361 with a delta of 0.3%. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16351 with a delta of 0.4%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504 with a delta of -0.5%. These small deltas indicate the Radeon PRO W7500 sits in a competitive band where no single rival dominates by more than half a percent.

Specification Differences

The memory configuration differs substantially. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s and memory clock listed at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s and memory clock at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The LX ULTRA provides three times the memory capacity, a 50% wider bus, and 68.75% more bandwidth.

Compute rates favor the LX ULTRA in raw numbers. The AMD card delivers a pixel rate of 108.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 190.4 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. Floating point performance shows the AMD card at 12.19 TFLOPS for FP32 and 24.37 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The LX ULTRA reaches 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 at the same 2:1 ratio. This is approximately a 2x difference in every compute metric.

Power and physical design differ as well. The AMD card has a TDP of 70 W, is single-slot, requires no power connectors, and suggests a 250 W power supply. The LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, is dual-slot, requires one 16-pin connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply. The AMD card measures 216 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The LX ULTRA measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The bus interface also differs: the AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs vary, with the AMD card offering 4x DisplayPort 2.1 and the LX ULTRA offering 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has 256.0 GB/s. The LX ULTRA also has a 192-bit bus compared to 128-bit.

Q: What are the benchmark scores for the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA?

A: The database lists no benchmark scores for the LX ULTRA. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 50.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD card has an average benchmark score of 16415. It is within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT, 0.4% of the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, and exactly tied with the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at a delta of 0%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is 0.5% ahead.

Q: What is the power requirement for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has a TDP of 70 W and suggests a 250 W power supply with no power connectors needed. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, requires one 16-pin connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply.

Q: Which card supports newer display outputs?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 supports 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA supports 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Q: Do both cards use the same manufacturing process?

A: Yes, both are built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The AMD card has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, while the LX ULTRA has unknown transistor count and die size.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 wins in every category where measured data exists. Its benchmark scores are fully documented, its percentile rank of 59 exceeds the LX ULTRA's 50, and its average benchmark score of 16415 provides a concrete reference point. The AMD card also wins on power efficiency, with a 70 W TDP versus 225 W, no power connector requirement, and a single-slot design that fits in tighter spaces. Its 216 mm length compared to 268 mm makes it easier to install in compact systems. The AMD card supports Vulkan 1.4, one version higher than the LX ULTRA's 1.3, and DisplayPort 2.1 versus 1.4a.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins in raw specification comparisons where no benchmark verification exists. It has 24 GB of memory versus 8 GB, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 256.0 GB/s, and a 192-bit bus versus 128-bit. Its compute rates are roughly double: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 12.19 TFLOPS, 384.0 GTexel/s versus 190.4 GTexel/s, and 192.0 GPixel/s versus 108.8 GPixel/s. It has 6144 shading units versus 1792, 192 TMUs versus 112, and 96 ROPs versus 64. The LX ULTRA also uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface versus x8, which could matter for data transfer in certain workloads.

The data indicates a split between verified performance and unverified specifications. For workloads that depend on measured outcomes, the AMD card is the only option with evidence. For workloads that require maximum memory capacity and raw compute numbers, the LX ULTRA claims superiority, but the absence of benchmarks leaves that claim unconfirmed. The AMD card's nearest rivals all score within 0.5% of its average, showing it operates in a well-established performance tier. The LX ULTRA has no such positioning data. The choice depends on whether the user trusts documented results or listed specifications.