AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 occupy very different positions in the database. The Radeon PRO W7500 has a full set of recorded benchmark results, while the LX 7G100 has no benchmark entries at all. This means the W7500 wins every measured comparison by default, but the LX 7G100 wins on paper specifications in several categories.

The Radeon PRO W7500 delivers its strongest results in the PassMark G3D test, scoring 13,368 points. Its Geekbench Vulkan score reaches 68,634, and its Geekbench OpenCL score sits at 58,213. These numbers place the W7500 at the 59th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The average benchmark score for the W7500 is 16,415, which places it near the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 16,408, essentially a tie with a 0 percent difference. It also sits close to the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16,361, a 0.3 percent gap, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M at 16,351, a 0.4 percent gap. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16,504, which puts it 0.5 percent ahead of the W7500.

The LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores, so its percentile sits at 50 by default. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero. This does not mean the card cannot perform, rather the database contains no measured results for it yet. Hardware analysts must rely on the specification sheet for this device.

The use-case split becomes clear: the W7500 is a validated, measured product for professional workloads where OpenCL and Vulkan performance matter. The LX 7G100 is an unverified design with higher theoretical specifications but no confirmed test data. Workstations requiring proven compute performance would favor the W7500. Environments where raw memory bandwidth and pixel throughput are the primary needs would look toward the LX 7G100, but only after validation.

Architecture Differences

The two cards share a common manufacturing foundation but diverge sharply in design philosophy. Both use a 6 nm process from TSMC. The W7500 is built on the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. Its transistor count is 13,300 million on a die size of 204 mm², giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip under an architecture labeled TrueGPU. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

The W7500 has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It includes 28 ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100 packs 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The database lists no ray tracing cores for the LX 7G100, which is a notable architectural gap for a card marketed as a workstation product. The shading unit count for the LX 7G100 is roughly 3.4 times that of the W7500, but without benchmark data, the real-world impact remains unknown.

Clock specifications differ significantly. The W7500 has a base clock of 1,500 MHz and a boost clock of 1,700 MHz. The LX 7G100 lists no base or boost clock in the database. Memory clocks show the LX 7G100 running at 2,250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the W7500 runs at 2,000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective.

The memory subsystems are quite different. The W7500 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That is 68.75 percent more bandwidth for the LX 7G100, a substantial advantage for memory-intensive workloads such as large texture sets or high-resolution compute.

Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern. The W7500 achieves 108.8 GPixel/s and 190.4 GTexel/s. The LX 7G100 achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The LX 7G100 leads by roughly 76 percent in pixel throughput and roughly 102 percent in texture throughput. Floating point performance shows the LX 7G100 at 24.58 TFLOPS for FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The W7500 delivers 12.19 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.37 TFLOPS FP16, again a 2:1 ratio. The LX 7G100 has about double the raw compute throughput of the W7500.

Power and physical characteristics differ as well. The W7500 has a TDP of 70 W, is single-slot, requires no power connectors, and has a suggested PSU of 250 W. It measures 216 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W, is dual-slot, requires one 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W. Its dimensions are 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm. The LX 7G100 is longer, taller, and much thicker.

The bus interface also differs. The W7500 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The wider bus on the LX 7G100 provides more host bandwidth for data transfers. Display outputs show four DisplayPort 2.1 on the W7500 versus four DisplayPort 1.4a on the LX 7G100. The W7500 supports the newer DisplayPort standard.

API support is nearly identical. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The W7500 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. The W7500 has a slight advantage in the latest graphics API version.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two cards. The wins columns show zero for both devices. This is a direct consequence of the LX 7G100 having no recorded benchmark results. The comparison therefore relies on the W7500's measured scores and the LX 7G100's theoretical specifications.

For the W7500, the recorded data shows a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,213 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 68,634. These are strong results for a professional card with a 70 W TDP. The PassMark suite shows a G3D score of 13,368, a GPU compute score of 5,910, a G2D score of 1,174, a DirectX 9 score of 200, a DirectX 11 score of 125, a DirectX 10 score of 65, and a DirectX 12 score of 46. The W7500's average benchmark score of 16,415 places it squarely between the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 16,408 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 at 16,504.

The W7500's nearest rivals provide context for its standing. It essentially matches the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell with a 0 percent delta. It is 0.3 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and 0.4 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M. The GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 sits 0.5 percent ahead of the W7500. These narrow margins indicate that the W7500 performs at a level comparable to a diverse set of GPUs, from professional Blackwell parts to older gaming cards. The W7500's 59th percentile ranking among all GPUs reinforces its mid-pack positioning.

The LX 7G100 cannot be benchmarked against the W7500 because no scores exist. Its theoretical FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is roughly double the W7500's 12.19 TFLOPS. Its memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is 68.75 percent higher. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is 76.5 percent higher. Its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is 101.7 percent higher. These specification advantages suggest that the LX 7G100 would outperform the W7500 in raw compute and memory-bound tasks, but the absence of measured results prevents any confirmation.

The W7500's advantages lie in efficiency and validation. At 70 W TDP, it draws one third the power of the LX 7G100's 225 W TDP. It requires no external power connector, while the LX 7G100 needs one 8-pin connector. Its single-slot design fits in denser chassis configurations. The W7500 also supports DisplayPort 2.1, a newer standard than the LX 7G100's DisplayPort 1.4a.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher raw compute performance according to the database?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 lists 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 lists 12.19 TFLOPS FP32 and 24.37 TFLOPS FP16. The LX 7G100 has roughly double the theoretical compute throughput.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the LX 7G100, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero. Its percentile ranking sits at 50 by default.

Q: How does the Radeon PRO W7500 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The W7500's average benchmark score of 16,415 is essentially tied with the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 16,408, showing a 0 percent difference. It is 0.3 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and 0.4 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 sits 0.5 percent ahead at 16,504.

Q: What memory configurations do the two cards use?

A: The W7500 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card is more power efficient?

A: The W7500 has a TDP of 70 W with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W with one 8-pin connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The W7500 consumes less than one third the power.

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The W7500 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is the only one of the two cards with verified performance data. Its average benchmark score of 16,415 places it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, with measured strengths in Geekbench Vulkan at 68,634 and Geekbench OpenCL at 58,213. It competes directly with the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, matching that card's average score within a 0 percent delta. It also trades blows with the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, both within 0.4 percent. The W7500 achieves this with a 70 W TDP, a single-slot cooler, and no external power requirement. It is a proven, efficient workstation solution for OpenCL and Vulkan workloads, and its DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support modern display connectivity.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 presents a different proposition. On paper, it offers double the FP32 throughput at 24.58 TFLOPS, 68.75 percent more memory bandwidth at 432.0 GB/s, and higher pixel and texture rates. Its 12 GB of memory on a 192-bit bus is 50 percent larger than the W7500's 8 GB. Its PCIe 4.0 x16 interface doubles the host bandwidth of the W7500's x8 link. These specifications point toward a card built for compute-heavy or memory-bound tasks. However, the complete absence of benchmark results means these advantages remain theoretical. The LX 7G100 also carries a 225 W TDP, requires a dual-slot footprint, and needs an 8-pin power connector, making it a bulkier and more power-hungry solution.

The data supports a clear split. Workstation users who need verified performance, high efficiency, and a compact single-slot design should choose the AMD Radeon PRO W7500. Its benchmark results are recorded, its nearest rivals are within a fraction of a percent, and its power draw is minimal. Users considering the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 must weigh its superior theoretical specifications against the lack of any measured data. The database cannot confirm its real-world performance. Until benchmark results are recorded for the LX 7G100, the W7500 remains the only card in this comparison with proven capabilities.