AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no directly recorded head-to-head results between the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The W7400 has no registered benchmark scores, while the RTX 4070 Ti has a substantial set of measurements. This asymmetry is itself informative: the database shows the W7400 scoring in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX 4070 Ti sits in the 84th percentile.

The RTX 4070 Ti delivers an average benchmark score of 44,795 across its recorded tests. Its nearest rivals in the database frame this performance level clearly. The RTX 5090 Mobile averages 45,152, a 0.8% gap. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT averages 45,384, putting it 1.3% ahead. The RTX A6000 trails by 1.6% at 44,075, while the Intel Arc A730M leads by 1.7% at 45,592. These deltas place the RTX 4070 Ti in a tightly contested band, none of its nearest rivals more than 1.7% away in either direction.

Looking at individual workloads for the RTX 4070 Ti, the data shows a strong all-round profile. In Geekbench Vulkan it records 213,808, and in Geekbench OpenCL it scores 176,953. The Passmark suite shows 31,624 in G3D and 18,396 in GPU compute. DirectX 9 and 11 scores are 352 and 288 respectively, with DirectX 10 at 187 and DirectX 12 at 116. The 2D score is 1,200.

Since the W7400 carries no recorded benchmark entries, the head-to-head comparison must rely on architectural and capacity differences rather than measured performance deltas. The database indicates the W7400 has zero recorded wins and the RTX 4070 Ti has zero recorded wins in direct comparisons; no such comparisons exist in the records.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from fundamentally different design families. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses the AD104 chip built on Ada Lovelace architecture and belongs to the GeForce 40 series.

Manufacturing process nodes differ significantly. The W7400 is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the RTX 4070 Ti uses a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. Transistor counts reflect this gap: the W7400 packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The RTX 4070 Ti carries 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, reaching 121.8 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip has roughly 2.7 times the transistor count on a die that is only about 1.4 times larger.

Execution resources diverge sharply. The W7400 has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It includes 28 ray tracing cores but no tensor cores. The RTX 4070 Ti has 7,680 shading units, 240 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, with 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores. The shading unit count is 4.3 times higher on the NVIDIA card.

Clock behavior also differs. The W7400 has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1,100 MHz. The RTX 4070 Ti runs at a 2,310 MHz base and 2,610 MHz boost. The NVIDIA card’s boost clock is more than double the AMD card’s boost figure.

Memory architecture is another major divider. The W7400 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti uses 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s. The NVIDIA card offers 50% more capacity and roughly 2.9 times the bandwidth.

Compute throughput figures reinforce the gap. The W7400 delivers 7.885 TFLOPS FP32 and the same figure for FP16 (1:1 ratio). The RTX 4070 Ti delivers 40.09 TFLOPS FP32, also with a 1:1 FP16 ratio. That is a 5.1 times advantage for the NVIDIA card. Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern: 70.40 GPixel/s and 123.2 GTexel/s for the W7400, versus 208.8 GPixel/s and 626.4 GTexel/s for the RTX 4070 Ti.

API support is identical on paper: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs differ, with the W7400 offering four DisplayPort 2.1 connections while the RTX 4070 Ti provides one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a ports.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: Only the RTX 4070 Ti has recorded benchmark scores. Its average is 44,795. The W7400 has no recorded benchmark entries and an average score of 0.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti compare to its closest rivals?

A: It trails the RTX 5090 Mobile by 0.8%, trails the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT by 1.3%, leads the RTX A6000 by 1.6%, and trails the Intel Arc A730M by 1.7%.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The W7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6, while the RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB of GDDR6X. The bus widths are 128-bit and 192-bit respectively.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has 7,680 shading units, compared to 1,792 on the W7400.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The W7400 has a TDP of 55 W and requires no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. The RTX 4070 Ti has a TDP of 285 W, uses one 16-pin connector, and suggests a 600 W PSU.

Q: Are both cards still in production?

A: No. The W7400 is listed as Active production status, while the RTX 4070 Ti is listed as End-of-life.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Radeon PRO W7400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |

| Process node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 35,800 million |

| Die size | 204 mm² | 294 mm² |

| Base clock | 330 MHz | 2310 MHz |

| Boost clock | 1100 MHz | 2610 MHz |

| Memory | 8 GB GDDR6 | 12 GB GDDR6X |

| Memory bus | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 172.8 GB/s | 504.2 GB/s |

| Shading units | 1792 | 7680 |

| TMUs | 112 | 240 |

| ROPs | 64 | 80 |

| RT cores | 28 | 60 |

| Tensor cores | None | 240 |

| FP32 | 7.885 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) | 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| Pixel rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | 208.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 626.4 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 55 W | 285 W |

| Slot width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 600 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Dimensions | 168 mm length, 69 mm height, 20 mm width | 285 mm length, 112 mm height, 42 mm width |

| Production status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release date | 2025-08-02 | 2023-01-02 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Pro Vega | GeForce 30 |

| Successor | None | GeForce 50 |

| Percentile vs all GPUs | 50 | 84 |

| Launch MSRP | Not available | 799 USD |

The Verdict

The data points clearly toward the RTX 4070 Ti as the dominant performer in every measured category. Its 84th percentile standing versus the W7400’s 50th percentile is the simplest summary of their respective positions. The RTX 4070 Ti’s average score of 44,795 comes from ten recorded benchmarks, while the W7400 has none.

The RTX 4070 Ti offers roughly 5.1 times the FP32 throughput, 2.9 times the memory bandwidth, 4.3 times the shading units, and 2.1 times the RT cores. It also carries 12 GB of GDDR6X versus 8 GB of GDDR6. These are not marginal differences; they represent entirely different performance classes.

The W7400 does hold advantages in power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 55 W TDP with no power connectors and single-slot design contrast sharply with the RTX 4070 Ti’s 285 W TDP, 16-pin connector, and dual-slot width. The W7400 is also shorter at 168 mm versus 285 mm, and thinner at 20 mm versus 42 mm. For constrained chassis environments, the W7400 is the only viable option between the two.

Production status also separates them. The W7400 is Active while the RTX 4070 Ti is End-of-life, with the NVIDIA card’s successor listed as GeForce 50. The RTX 4070 Ti was released on 2023-01-02, while the W7400 came later on 2025-08-02. The W7400’s predecessor is listed as Radeon Pro Vega, and it has no successor.

The RTX 4070 Ti’s launch MSRP was 799 USD, a figure the database records once.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti wins in all raw performance metrics. The recorded benchmark suite for the RTX 4070 Ti shows its strongest results in Geekbench Vulkan at 213,808 and Geekbench OpenCL at 176,953. Passmark G3D at 31,624 and GPU compute at 18,396 round out a comprehensive compute profile. The W7400 has no recorded scores to contest any of these measurements.

The RTX 4070 Ti wins in memory capacity, bandwidth, shading throughput, ray tracing capability, and tensor core availability. Its 240 tensor cores give it a feature the W7400 lacks entirely. The 60 RT cores versus 28 provide double the ray tracing hardware.

The W7400 wins in power consumption and installation flexibility. Its 55 W TDP requires no auxiliary power connectors and only a 250 W suggested PSU. The single-slot form factor and compact dimensions (168 mm length, 69 mm height, 20 mm width) permit installation in space-constrained systems where the RTX 4070 Ti’s 285 mm length, 112 mm height, and 42 mm width would not fit. The W7400 also supports four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, which may suit multi-display professional setups better than the RTX 4070 Ti’s single HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a ports.

The W7400 also holds a production status advantage as an Active product with no successor, while the RTX 4070 Ti is End-of-life with a listed successor. For buyers prioritizing current availability and a newer release date, the W7400 is the recorded choice.

The RTX 4070 Ti wins on PCIe interface width, using x16 versus the W7400’s x8, and on its memory type, using GDDR6X versus GDDR6. Its 192-bit bus versus 128-bit further cements its bandwidth advantage. The RTX 4070 Ti also holds a higher transistor density, 121.8M per mm² versus 65.2M per mm², indicating a more densely packed design.

In summary, the RTX 4070 Ti is the clear performance winner across every compute and graphics metric in the database. The W7400 wins only in power draw, physical size, display output count, and production longevity. Users needing maximum throughput should select the RTX 4070 Ti. Users needing minimal power draw, single-slot installation, or four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs should select the W7400.