AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive advantage for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile across every measurable benchmark category. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, leaving the comparison entirely defined by the NVIDIA part's performance profile. The RTX 4060 Mobile achieves an average benchmark score of 22,729, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs, while the W7400 sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero due to missing data. This percentile gap is substantial and indicates that the NVIDIA part is positioned significantly higher in the overall performance distribution.

Examining the RTX 4060 Mobile's individual benchmark results provides context for its standing. Its strongest result comes from Geekbench Vulkan, where it scores 89,569, marginally ahead of its Geekbench OpenCL score of 89,420. These two scores are nearly identical, differing by only 149 points, which suggests consistent compute performance across different API frontends. In Passmark testing, the G3D score of 17,469 is the dominant gaming-oriented metric, while the GPU compute score of 6,816 reflects a separate workload class. The older DirectX API results show 216 for DirectX 9, 157 for DirectX 11, 107 for DirectX 10, and 73 for DirectX 12, with the G2D score at 730. The DirectX 12 result being lower than DirectX 11 and DirectX 9 is notable, as it may indicate driver overhead or workload characteristics rather than raw capability.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 4060 Mobile, based on average scores, include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with a score of 22,895 and a delta of negative 0.7 percent, meaning the RTX 4060 Mobile trails it by a negligible margin. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT scores 22,549, putting the RTX 4060 Mobile ahead by 0.8 percent. The Intel Arc B580 scores 23,021, placing the RTX 4060 Mobile behind by 1.3 percent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile scores 22,435, with the RTX 4060 Mobile ahead by 1.3 percent. These deltas are all within roughly one and a half percent, indicating that the RTX 4060 Mobile sits in a tightly contested performance band where no rival dominates by a wide margin. The W7400 has no nearest rivals listed, reinforcing that its competitive positioning cannot be quantified from the available data.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22,729, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has no recorded benchmarks and an average score of zero.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 Mobile compare to its closest rivals in average score?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 by 0.7 percent (22,895 vs. 22,729) and the Intel Arc B580 by 1.3 percent (23,021 vs. 22,729). It leads the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT by 0.8 percent (22,549) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile by 1.3 percent (22,435).

Q: What is the performance percentile for each GPU?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile is in the 67th percentile of all GPUs, whereas the W7400 is in the 50th percentile.

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 floating-point throughput?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile delivers 11.61 TFLOPS FP32, compared to the W7400's 7.885 TFLOPS, a difference of approximately 3.7 TFLOPS.

Q: What are the memory bandwidth figures for each GPU?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, while the W7400 has 172.8 GB/s, a gap of 83.2 GB/s in favor of the NVIDIA part.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different architectural generations and process nodes. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, produced on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its codename is Hotpink Bonefish, and it belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile uses the AD107 chip on Ada Lovelace architecture, produced on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. It belongs to the GeForce 40 Mobile generation. The process node difference is one nanometer, but the transistor density tells a clearer story: the RTX 4060 Mobile packs 118.9 million transistors per square millimeter versus 65.2 million for the W7400. This density advantage comes despite the RTX 4060 Mobile having a smaller die size of 159 mm² compared to the W7400's 204 mm². Total transistor counts are 18,900 million for the NVIDIA part and 13,300 million for the AMD part.

Core configuration differs sharply. The RTX 4060 Mobile has 3,072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units. The W7400 has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Despite fewer shading units, the W7400 has more TMUs and ROPs, which affects texture and pixel throughput. The RTX 4060 Mobile includes 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores, while the W7400 has 28 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. This means the NVIDIA part has dedicated hardware for AI workloads and DLSS-style features, while the AMD part lacks tensor cores entirely.

Clock behavior also diverges. The W7400 has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1,100 MHz, which is unusually low and likely reflects a low-power professional card design. The RTX 4060 Mobile has a base clock of 1,545 MHz and a boost clock of 1,890 MHz, running at much higher frequencies. Memory clocks differ as well: the W7400 uses 1,350 MHz with 10.8 Gbps effective, while the RTX 4060 Mobile uses 2,000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective. Both use 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, but the bandwidth differs due to the clock speeds.

The TDP is another major architectural differentiator. The W7400 consumes 55 W, while the RTX 4060 Mobile consumes 115 W. The W7400 is a single-slot card with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The RTX 4060 Mobile is an integrated GPU package (IGP) with no power connectors and no suggested PSU listed. The W7400 has physical dimensions of 168 mm length, 69 mm height, and 20 mm width, while the RTX 4060 Mobile has no recorded dimensions due to its mobile nature. Display outputs also differ: the W7400 has 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while the RTX 4060 Mobile's outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear verdict: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is the stronger performer in every measured category, but the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 occupies a different design space with lower power draw and a professional form factor. The RTX 4060 Mobile delivers 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 versus 7.885 TFLOPS for the W7400, a 47 percent advantage in raw compute. Its memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s exceeds the W7400's 172.8 GB/s by 48 percent. The pixel rate of 90.72 GPixel/s for the NVIDIA part beats the W7400's 70.40 GPixel/s, and the texture rate of 181.4 GTexel/s beats 123.2 GTexel/s. These figures consistently favor the RTX 4060 Mobile across all throughput metrics.

The RTX 4060 Mobile also has the only recorded benchmark data, with an average score of 22,729 and a 67th percentile ranking. The W7400 has no benchmarks and sits at the 50th percentile, which in the database represents a neutral baseline rather than a tested position. The RTX 4060 Mobile's nearest rivals are all within 1.3 percent of its average score, confirming that it performs at a level comparable to desktop GPUs like the RTX 2080 and RX 7700 XT. This places it in a competitive mid-to-high tier.

The W7400's advantages are limited to specific hardware characteristics: it has more TMUs (112 vs. 96), more ROPs (64 vs. 48), more ray tracing cores (28 vs. 24), a lower TDP (55 W vs. 115 W), and a larger die (204 mm² vs. 159 mm²). It also has a dedicated single-slot form factor with four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, whereas the RTX 4060 Mobile is an IGP with portable device dependent outputs. The W7400's release date is later, coming in 2025-08-02, while the RTX 4060 Mobile launched on 2023-01-02. The W7400's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, while the RTX 4060 Mobile's predecessor is the GeForce 30 Mobile and its successor is the GeForce 50 Mobile.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The process node is one nanometer apart: 6 nm for the W7400 and 5 nm for the RTX 4060 Mobile. Transistor density is 65.2 million per mm² for AMD versus 118.9 million per mm² for NVIDIA. Die size is 204 mm² versus 159 mm². Transistor count is 13,300 million versus 18,900 million. Base clock is 330 MHz versus 1,545 MHz. Boost clock is 1,100 MHz versus 1,890 MHz. Memory clock is 1,350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective) versus 2,000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). Memory bandwidth is 172.8 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s. Shading units are 1,792 versus 3,072. TMUs are 112 versus 96. ROPs are 64 versus 48. Ray tracing cores are 28 versus 24. Tensor cores are absent on the W7400 versus 96 on the RTX 4060 Mobile. Pixel rate is 70.40 GPixel/s versus 90.72 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 123.2 GTexel/s versus 181.4 GTexel/s. FP32 is 7.885 TFLOPS versus 11.61 TFLOPS. TDP is 55 W versus 115 W. Slot width is single-slot versus IGP. Suggested PSU is 250 W versus none. Dimensions are 168 mm by 69 mm by 20 mm versus none recorded. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.1 versus portable device dependent. The bus interface is identical: PCIe 4.0 x8 on both. Memory size, type, and bus width are also identical: 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both are marked as active in production. The W7400 has no successor, while the RTX 4060 Mobile's successor is the GeForce 50 Mobile.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile wins in every benchmark category with recorded data, and its specification sheet dominates in compute throughput, memory bandwidth, pixel rate, texture rate, shading units, tensor cores, and clock speeds. It is the clear choice for workloads that rely on raw FP32 performance, such as general compute, machine learning inference (given its 96 tensor cores), and high-resolution rendering. Its 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports faster data movement, and its 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 output positions it well for demanding graphics tasks. The 67th percentile ranking and average score of 22,729 place it above the median GPU, and its nearest rivals within one percent confirm it trades blows with desktop-class cards.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 wins on power efficiency and form factor. Its 55 W TDP is less than half the RTX 4060 Mobile's 115 W, making it suitable for low-power professional environments such as workstations where thermal and power budgets are constrained. Its single-slot design with four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs provides a fixed, multi-display professional interface that the mobile IGP cannot match. The W7400 also has more texture mapping units (112 vs. 96) and more render output units (64 vs. 48), which could benefit certain texturing or fill-rate-bound workloads despite its lower overall throughput. Its 28 ray tracing cores exceed the RTX 4060 Mobile's 24, though without tensor cores or benchmark data, the practical ray tracing advantage cannot be quantified. The W7400's larger die (204 mm²) and later release date (2025-08-02) suggest a more recent design tailored for professional stability rather than peak performance.

For users prioritizing measured performance and benchmark-verified capability, the RTX 4060 Mobile is the only option with data support. For users prioritizing low power draw, a fixed single-slot form factor, and dedicated multi-monitor DisplayPort outputs, the W7400 offers those features explicitly. The database contains no benchmarks for the W7400, so any performance claim for that part cannot be substantiated from the recorded data. The RTX 4060 Mobile's performance is fully documented, with nine benchmark scores and a competitive standing against four named rivals.