AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO W7400

CORE STATE Navi 33
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1100 MHz
TDP 55 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4060

CORE STATE AD107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2460 MHz
TDP 115 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
2,302
geekbench_opencl
N/A
95,057
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
48,643
passmark_directx_10
N/A
103
passmark_directx_11
N/A
175
passmark_directx_12
N/A
76
passmark_directx_9
N/A
236
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,037
passmark_g3d
N/A
19,545
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
9,213

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 against the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. The headToHeadBenchmarks field is empty, and the Radeon PRO W7400 carries no individual benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and a percentile ranking of 50. The GeForce RTX 4060, by contrast, has a full suite of ten recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 17639, and sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs in the database.

The absence of direct comparison data is itself informative. The Radeon PRO W7400 has no recorded performance measurements, meaning any quantitative head-to-head analysis must rely on the RTX 4060's standalone results and its nearest rival comparisons. The RTX 4060's nearest rivals, as listed in the database, are all AMD parts: the Radeon HD 7790 with an average score of 17666 and a delta of -0.2%, the Radeon 780M at 17588 with a delta of 0.3%, the Radeon Pro 560 at 17551 with a delta of 0.5%, and the Radeon Pro 460 at 17509 with a delta of 0.7%. These deltas are remarkably small, within a single percentage point, indicating a tightly clustered performance band around the RTX 4060's average score.

Breaking down the RTX 4060's individual benchmark results reveals its strengths. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2302. In Geekbench OpenCL, it reaches 95057, while its Geekbench Vulkan score is 48643. Passmark results show a G3D score of 19545, a G2D score of 1037, and a GPU compute score of 9213. The DirectX-specific Passmark tests show 103 for DX10, 175 for DX11, 76 for DX12, and 236 for DX9. The compute-oriented workloads, particularly the Geekbench OpenCL result, dominate the overall average, suggesting the RTX 4060's architecture is well-suited to general-purpose compute tasks.

The Radeon PRO W7400's lack of benchmark data means it cannot be positioned against these numbers. Its percentile rank of 50 is a midpoint placement, but without scores, that rank carries no comparative weight. The database simply does not record any performance evidence for the AMD card, which is a significant gap for any potential buyer or analyst seeking quantitative validation.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear distinction between these two cards, but only from one side. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is a fully characterized product with ten benchmark scores, an average score of 17639, and a 61st percentile placement. Its nearest rivals all sit within 0.7% of its average score, confirming that its measured performance is consistent and reproducible across multiple synthetic workloads.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has no recorded benchmarks, an average score of zero, and a 50th percentile rank. The database offers no evidence of its real-world or synthetic performance. It is an active production card with a release date in 2025, but the measurements that would allow a performance verdict are entirely absent.

From a strict data perspective, the RTX 4060 is the only card with demonstrated performance. Its compute scores, particularly the Geekbench OpenCL result of 95057, indicate a high level of general-purpose throughput. Its Passmark G3D score of 19545 and 3DMark score of 2302 provide gaming and graphics workload evidence. The Radeon PRO W7400 cannot be recommended on performance grounds because no performance data exists for it in the database.

The RTX 4060 is end-of-life per the production status field, while the Radeon PRO W7400 is active. This suggests the AMD card is the newer product, but newness alone does not translate to performance. The verdict, based strictly on recorded data, is that the RTX 4060 is the only card with measurable performance, and any user requiring benchmark validation must choose it. The Radeon PRO W7400 remains an unverified quantity.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060?

A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639, based on ten recorded tests.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark scores for the Radeon PRO W7400, with an average score of 0.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790?

A: The Radeon HD 7790 has an average score of 17666, which is 0.2% higher than the RTX 4060's 17639.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each card among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 4060 is at the 61st percentile, while the Radeon PRO W7400 is at the 50th percentile.

Q: Which card has a higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: Only the RTX 4060 has a recorded Geekbench OpenCL score, which is 95057.

Q: What is the production status of each card?

A: The Radeon PRO W7400 is listed as active, while the RTX 4060 is listed as end-of-life.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every technical specification in the database. The Radeon PRO W7400 uses a 6 nm process node, while the RTX 4060 uses a 5 nm node, both from TSMC. The transistor counts differ substantially: the AMD card has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, while the NVIDIA card has 18,900 million transistors on a smaller 159 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 65.2M per mm² for the AMD card and 118.9M per mm² for the NVIDIA card.

Clock speeds show a wide divergence. The Radeon PRO W7400 has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz, while the RTX 4060 has a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz. Memory clocks also differ: the AMD card runs at 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective), while the NVIDIA card runs at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective). Both cards have 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, but the resulting bandwidth differs: 172.8 GB/s for the AMD card versus 272.0 GB/s for the NVIDIA card.

The shading unit counts are 1792 for the AMD card and 3072 for the NVIDIA card. Texture mapping units number 112 for AMD and 96 for NVIDIA, while raster operation units are 64 for AMD and 48 for NVIDIA. Ray tracing cores are 28 for AMD and 24 for NVIDIA, and the NVIDIA card additionally has 96 tensor cores, a feature the AMD card lacks entirely. Pixel rates are 70.40 GPixel/s for AMD and 118.1 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rates are 123.2 GTexel/s for AMD and 236.2 GTexel/s for NVIDIA. FP32 performance is 7.885 TFLOPS for AMD and 15.11 TFLOPS for NVIDIA, with both cards showing 1:1 FP16 ratios.

Power and physical specifications differ as well. The Radeon PRO W7400 has a TDP of 55 W and is single-slot, while the RTX 4060 has a TDP of 115 W and is dual-slot. The AMD card uses no power connectors, while the NVIDIA card uses one 12-pin connector. Suggested PSU ratings are 250 W for AMD and 300 W for NVIDIA. Dimensions vary: the AMD card is 168 mm long, 69 mm high, and 20 mm wide, while the NVIDIA card is 240 mm long, 111 mm high, and 40 mm wide. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.1 for AMD and 1x HDMI 2.1 plus 3x DisplayPort 1.4a for NVIDIA. Release dates are 2025 for AMD and 2023 for NVIDIA, with the AMD card active and the NVIDIA card end-of-life.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is fundamental. The Radeon PRO W7400 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish, belonging to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The RTX 4060 uses the AD107 chip built on Ada Lovelace architecture, belonging to the GeForce 40-series generation. These are entirely different design philosophies from AMD and NVIDIA respectively.

The RDNA 3.0 architecture in the AMD card emphasizes a 6 nm process with a lower transistor density of 65.2M per mm². Its 28 ray tracing cores and 1792 shading units operate at notably low clock speeds, with a boost of only 1100 MHz. The Ada Lovelace architecture in the NVIDIA card uses a 5 nm process with a much higher transistor density of 118.9M per mm². Its 3072 shading units, 24 ray tracing cores, and 96 tensor cores run at a boost clock of 2460 MHz.

The tensor core count is a defining difference. The RTX 4060 includes 96 tensor cores, which are absent in the Radeon PRO W7400. This indicates support for AI-accelerated workloads in the NVIDIA card that the AMD card does not offer at the hardware level. The AMD card also lacks any successor in the database, while the RTX 4060 has a listed successor in GeForce 50 and a predecessor in GeForce 30. The Radeon PRO W7400's predecessor is listed as Radeon Pro Vega.

Display output technology differs, with the AMD card supporting DisplayPort 2.1 across all four outputs, while the NVIDIA card uses HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4a. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface is identical at PCIe 4.0 x8 for both.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 wins every category where performance is measured. Its ten benchmark scores span compute, graphics, and legacy DirectX tests. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 is its standout result, indicating strong compute throughput. The Passmark G3D score of 19545 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 demonstrate graphics rendering capability. The RTX 4060 also carries the tensor cores, a hardware feature absent from the AMD card, which positions it for AI-related tasks.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 wins on physical attributes. It is a single-slot card with a 55 W TDP, no power connectors, and a suggested PSU of 250 W. Its dimensions are substantially smaller: 168 mm in length versus 240 mm, 69 mm in height versus 111 mm, and 20 mm in width versus 40 mm. It uses DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, which is a newer standard than the RTX 4060's DisplayPort 1.4a. It is an active product with a 2025 release date, while the RTX 4060 is end-of-life with a 2023 release date.

The Radeon PRO W7400 also has a lower transistor count of 13,300 million versus 18,900 million, and a lower FP32 rating of 7.885 TFLOPS versus 15.11 TFLOPS. These are not wins in performance terms but indicate a more power-efficient design profile. The AMD card's 28 ray tracing cores versus 24 for NVIDIA is a small numerical advantage, but without benchmark data, its real-world impact cannot be assessed.

The use-case split is therefore stark. The RTX 4060 is the only card with demonstrated performance across compute, graphics, and legacy workloads. It wins on every measurable performance metric. The Radeon PRO W7400 wins on physical footprint, power requirements, and connector simplicity, plus the newer DisplayPort standard. For any workload requiring raw performance, the data points exclusively to the RTX 4060. For constrained physical installations or low-power environments, the Radeon PRO W7400's specifications are favorable, but its performance remains entirely unverified in the database.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
PRO W7400
RTX 4060
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,792
3,072 +71.4%
Shaders
1,792
3,072 +71.4%
TMUs
112
96 -14.3%
ROPs
64
48 -25.0%
Compute Units
28
—
SM Count
—
24
Clocks
Base Clock
330 MHz
1830 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
2460 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz 10.8 Gbps effective
2125 MHz 17 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
8,192 0.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
172.8 GB/s
272.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
24 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
—
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
70.40 GPixel/s
118.1 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
123.2 GTexel/s
236.2 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
7.885 TFLOPS
15.11 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
246.4 GFLOPS (1:32)
236.2 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
7.885 TFLOPS (1:1)
15.11 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
28
24 -14.3%
Tensor Cores
—
96
Matrix Cores
56
—
Power
TDP
55 W
115 W
TDP (W)
55
115 +109.1%
Suggested PSU
250 W
300 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 12-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Navi 33
AD107
Codename
Hotpink Bonefish
—
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)
GeForce 40
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
13,300 million
18,900 million
Die Size
204 mm²
159 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
65.2M / mm²
118.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
—
8.9
Shader Model
6.9
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
Dual-slot
Length
168 mm 6.6 inches
240 mm 9.4 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
111 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
—
299 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Radeon Pro Vega
GeForce 30
Successor
—
GeForce 50
View Radeon PRO W7400 Details View GeForce RTX 4060 Details