AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile Comparison

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 and Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile occupy completely different segments of the GPU market. The data indicates these are not competitors in any practical sense, they are products for entirely different use cases. The Radeon PRO W7400 is a discrete, single-slot workstation card built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a 55 W TDP, 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, and 1792 shading units. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile is a 15 W integrated graphics processor embedded in Raptor Lake mobile chips, sharing system memory and offering only 128 shading units.

The recorded specifications show a performance gap of roughly 25 times in raw FP32 throughput, 7.885 TFLOPS versus 307.2 GFLOPS. Anyone needing actual graphics work, rendering, or GPU acceleration should choose the Radeon PRO W7400. The Intel part exists solely for basic display output, video playback, and light desktop workloads on laptops where battery life and low power draw take priority. The percentile data places both at the 50th percentile against all GPUs, but this is misleading without benchmark scores; the architectural and specification differences tell the real story.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses the Navi 33 chip built on a 6 nm TSMC process, with the RDNA 3.0 architecture and the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi series, specifically the Navi III generation. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The production status is Active, and it succeeded the Radeon Pro Vega line.

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses the Raptor Lake chip built on Intel's 10 nm process, with the Generation 12.2 architecture. It belongs to the HD Graphics-M generation for Raptor Lake. Intel does not record transistor count, die size, or transistor density for this part. The production status is Active, and its successor is listed as Arc Graphics-M.

The Radeon PRO W7400 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The DirectX version difference, 12_2 versus 12_1, reflects the AMD part's newer feature set including hardware ray tracing support, which the Intel part lacks entirely.

The memory architecture differs fundamentally. The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel iGPU uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth figure and a system shared bus width. This means the Intel part's memory performance depends entirely on the host laptop's RAM configuration, while the AMD card has dedicated, consistent memory bandwidth.

Clock behavior also differs. The Radeon PRO W7400 has a 330 MHz base clock and 1100 MHz boost clock, with memory running at 1350 MHz or 10.8 Gbps effective. The Intel part has a 300 MHz base clock and 1200 MHz boost clock, with no dedicated memory clock since it shares system memory.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for these two products, and both have zero recorded benchmark scores. The wins counter shows zero for each side. This absence of measured data means the comparison must rely on the recorded specification fields.

The FP32 throughput difference is decisive: 7.885 TFLOPS for the Radeon PRO W7400 versus 307.2 GFLOPS for the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile. This is a 25.7 times advantage for the AMD card in single-precision floating point compute. The FP16 figures show 7.885 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio for AMD, while Intel delivers 614.4 GFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, meaning the Intel part's FP16 throughput is double its FP32 rate, a common design for integrated graphics.

Pixel fill rate shows 70.40 GPixel/s for AMD versus 4.800 GPixel/s for Intel, a 14.7 times difference. Texture fill rate shows 123.2 GTexel/s versus 9.600 GTexel/s, a 12.8 times difference. The ROP count is 64 versus 4, and the TMU count is 112 versus 8. These ratios confirm the AMD card is designed for serious rasterization work, while the Intel part can only manage basic 2D compositing and light 3D.

The Radeon PRO W7400 also has 28 ray tracing cores, which the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile lacks entirely. This makes hardware-accelerated ray tracing impossible on the Intel part, while the AMD card supports it as part of its DirectX 12 Ultimate feature set.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has 1792 shading units. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has 128 shading units, which is 14 times fewer.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: Does either GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has 28 ray tracing cores. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has no ray tracing cores listed in the database.

Q: What are the power consumption figures?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has a 55 W TDP with a suggested power supply of 250 W. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has a 15 W TDP and no suggested power supply since it is an integrated processor.

Q: Which GPU uses a newer manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses a 6 nm TSMC process. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses Intel's 10 nm process.

Q: What are the DirectX support levels?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), which is one feature level lower.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 wins in every performance metric recorded in the database. It has higher FP32 and FP16 compute throughput, higher pixel and texture fill rates, more shading units, TMUs, and ROPs, and it is the only one of the two with ray tracing cores. It uses dedicated GDDR6 memory instead of shared system memory, eliminating the variable of host RAM performance. Its 55 W TDP and single-slot design with no power connectors make it suitable for workstation builds where a compact discrete card is acceptable. The 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs provide professional display connectivity. Its 6 nm process and 13,300 million transistors indicate a serious, modern GPU implementation.

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile wins only in power efficiency and integration. Its 15 W TDP is less than one third of the AMD card's 55 W figure. It requires no power connectors, no slot space, and no separate memory purchase, since it uses system shared memory. This makes it the only option for thin laptops where a discrete card physically cannot fit. Its 300 MHz base and 1200 MHz boost clocks are close to the AMD part's clock range, but with only 128 shading units, the practical output is limited to desktop compositing, video decode, and basic 2D acceleration. The Ring Bus interface and portable device dependent display outputs reflect its role as an embedded component rather than a standalone product.

The release dates confirm the positioning: the Intel part launched on 2023-01-03, while the AMD card launched on 2025-08-02. The Intel iGPU is an older, lower-power part, and the AMD card is a newer, higher-performance workstation product. The predecessor and successor fields reinforce this, with the Radeon PRO W7400 following the Radeon Pro Vega series, and the Intel part being succeeded by Arc Graphics-M.

For any workload involving 3D rendering, GPU compute, CAD, video editing, or gaming, the Radeon PRO W7400 is the clear choice based on the recorded data. For a basic office laptop that needs to display a desktop and play video, the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile consumes far less power and costs nothing extra in terms of board space or power delivery. The two products serve different markets and the data shows no meaningful overlap in capability.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO W7400 | Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Generation 12.2 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | Not recorded |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | Not recorded |

| Base Clock | 330 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1200 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | System Shared |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 172.8 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 128 |

| TMUs | 112 | 8 |

| ROPs | 64 | 4 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | 4.800 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 9.600 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 7.885 TFLOPS | 307.2 GFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) | 614.4 GFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 15 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | None | Not recorded |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | Not recorded |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | Ring Bus |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |

| Dimensions | 168 mm x 69 mm x 20 mm | Not recorded |

| Release Date | 2025-08-02 | 2023-01-03 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Pro Vega | Not recorded |

| Successor | Not recorded | Arc Graphics-M |