AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs Intel Arc Pro A60 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The available benchmark data for these two workstation GPUs is limited to the Intel Arc Pro A60, which has recorded scores in two open benchmark tests. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has no recorded benchmark entries in the database, so direct numerical comparison is not possible for most tests. However, the Intel Arc Pro A60's recorded scores can be interpreted against its nearest rivals to establish its performance tier.

The Intel Arc Pro A60 delivers a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63,485 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 57,166. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 60,326. This average places the card at the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The closest competitor in the database is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, which averages 60,347, a difference of 0%, meaning the two cards are statistically tied in average score. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 sits 0.3% behind with an average of 60,140, while the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M leads the Arc Pro A60 by 2.5% with 61,896. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 trails by 2.8% with 58,657.

The Radeon PRO W7400, by contrast, has no recorded average benchmark score and holds a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs. Without recorded scores, the database shows no head-to-head benchmark results between the two cards, and neither card records a win in any direct comparison test.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro A60 clearly wins in the only category with recorded data: measured benchmark performance. Its average score of 60,326 places it in the upper tier of workstation GPUs, competitive with high-end consumer cards like the RTX 4090 and ahead of several Radeon Pro models. The OpenCL score of 63,485 suggests strong compute throughput for general-purpose workloads, while the Vulkan score of 57,166 indicates capable graphics API performance.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has no recorded wins in any benchmark category because no benchmark scores exist in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking is based on hardware characteristics rather than measured results. In terms of raw specifications, the W7400 does hold advantages in certain areas: it uses a smaller 6 nm process node with a die size of 204 mm² versus 269 mm² for the Intel card, and it packs 13,300 million transistors into that smaller die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm² compared to 42.8 million per mm² for the Arc Pro A60. However, specification advantages do not translate directly into benchmark wins, and the database records no measured victories for the AMD card.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural families. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename "Hotpink Bonefish." It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The Intel Arc Pro A60 uses the DG2-256 chip built on Xe-HPG architecture, belonging to the Alchemist (Pro Series) generation. Both are manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process node, but the transistor counts and die sizes differ significantly.

The AMD chip integrates 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, while the Intel chip integrates 11,500 million transistors on a larger 269 mm² die. This results in the AMD card having a substantially higher transistor density: 65.2 million per mm² versus 42.8 million per mm² for Intel.

In terms of compute resources, the Intel Arc Pro A60 has more shading units (2,048 versus 1,792), more texture mapping units (128 versus 112), and the same number of render output units (64 each). The AMD card has more ray tracing cores (28 versus 16). Neither card features dedicated tensor cores.

Clock behavior differs notably. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1,100 MHz, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2,050 MHz. The Intel card's higher clocks contribute to its higher pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s, compared to 70.40 GPixel/s and 123.2 GTexel/s for the AMD card.

Floating-point performance also differs. The AMD card delivers 7.885 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio). The Intel card delivers 8.397 TFLOPS for FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS for FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio), meaning the Intel card has more than double the FP16 throughput of the AMD card.

Memory configurations diverge substantially. The AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth with memory clocked at 1,350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective). The Intel card has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth with memory clocked at 2,000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The Intel card has more than double the memory bandwidth and 50% more memory capacity.

Power requirements differ significantly. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has a TDP of 55 W and requires no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Intel Arc Pro A60 has a TDP of 130 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W. Both cards are single-slot designs. The AMD card measures 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width; the Intel card has no recorded dimensions.

The bus interfaces differ: the AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Intel card uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are similar in count but differ in version: the AMD card offers 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Intel card offers 4x DisplayPort 2.0. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The AMD card was released on August 2, 2025, while the Intel card was released earlier on June 5, 2023. The AMD card has a predecessor listed as Radeon Pro Vega, while the Intel card has no recorded predecessor. Both cards are currently marked as Active in production status.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear division between the two cards. The Intel Arc Pro A60 has measured benchmark performance that places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 60,326. It matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 within 0% and outperforms the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 by 0.3%, while trailing the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M by 2.5% and leading the AMD Radeon PRO V710 by 2.8%. For anyone selecting a GPU based on measured performance, the Arc Pro A60 is the only option with verified results.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 offers no benchmark data and sits at the 50th percentile. Its advantages exist only in architectural specifications: a smaller die, higher transistor density, more ray tracing cores, and a lower TDP of 55 W with no power connectors. The Intel card counters with more shading units, more TMUs, higher clock speeds, significantly higher memory bandwidth, more memory capacity, and higher FP32 and FP16 throughput.

For workloads that depend on measured compute or graphics performance, the Intel Arc Pro A60 is the validated choice. For scenarios where power draw is a constraint, the AMD card uses less than half the TDP (55 W versus 130 W) and requires no external power connectors, making it suitable for systems with a 250 W PSU suggestion versus 300 W for the Intel card. However, without benchmark scores for the AMD card, any performance expectation must remain speculative.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 has an average benchmark score of 60,326, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has no recorded average benchmark score.

Q: How does the Intel Arc Pro A60 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is statistically tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 (0% difference), leads the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 by 0.3%, trails the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M by 2.5%, and leads the AMD Radeon PRO V710 by 2.8%.

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 has 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth, more than double the 172.8 GB/s of the AMD Radeon PRO W7400.

Q: What are the ray tracing core counts for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has 28 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 has 16 ray tracing cores.

Q: Which card has a higher FP16 throughput?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 delivers 16.79 TFLOPS of FP16 performance, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 delivers 7.885 TFLOPS.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has a TDP of 55 W with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Intel Arc Pro A60 has a TDP of 130 W and a suggested PSU of 300 W.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO W7400 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | DG2-256 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe-HPG |

| Generation | Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) | Alchemist (Pro Series) |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 11,500 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 269 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 42.8M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 330 MHz | 900 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1,100 MHz | 2,050 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 172.8 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1,792 | 2,048 |

| TMUs | 112 | 128 |

| ROPs | 64 | 64 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 16 |

| Pixel Rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | 131.2 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 262.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS | 8.397 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) | 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 130 W |

| Power Connectors | None | Not specified |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | 300 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 2.0 |

| Release Date | 2025-08-02 | 2023-06-05 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 50 | 88 |

| Average Benchmark Score | Not recorded | 60,326 |