AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 and the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile. Neither GPU has recorded benchmark scores in our measurements, and both share an identical percentile ranking of 50 when compared against all other GPUs in the database. Their average benchmark scores are both recorded as zero, which indicates that no standardized test data has been captured for either product at this time.

Without recorded benchmark scores, the analysis must rely entirely on the architectural and specification data available in the database. The raw compute figures provide a clear starting point. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 delivers 7.885 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile delivers 1,280.0 GFLOPS, which translates to 1.280 TFLOPS. The AMD part offers approximately 6.16 times the FP32 throughput of the Intel part based on these figures.

In FP16 compute, the divergence shifts. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 achieves 7.885 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, meaning FP16 and FP32 performance are identical. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile delivers 2.560 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, which means its FP16 throughput is twice its FP32 throughput. The AMD part still leads in raw FP16 numbers, but the Intel part closes the relative gap compared to the FP32 comparison.

Pixel throughput shows a similar pattern. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 renders at 70.40 GPixel/s, while the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile renders at 20.00 GPixel/s. The AMD part is 3.52 times faster in pixel fill rate. Texture fill rate follows the same direction: the AMD part achieves 123.2 GTexel/s versus 40.00 GTexel/s for the Intel part, a 3.08 times advantage.

Memory bandwidth is another major separator. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent and memory type and bus width also system shared. The discrete memory subsystem of the AMD part provides a fixed and substantially higher bandwidth figure.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers, process nodes, and architectural generations. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The process node is 6 nm at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses the Wildcat Lake chip built on Xe3-LPG architecture. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake) generation. The process node is 3 nm at Intel, but the database records transistor count and die size as unknown, with transistor density left as null. The Intel part is a mobile integrated graphics processor, while the AMD part is a discrete single-slot card.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, 8 render output units, and 2 ray tracing cores. The AMD part has exactly 7 times the shading units, 7 times the texture mapping units, 8 times the render output units, and 14 times the ray tracing cores compared to the Intel part.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz. The Intel part boosts to more than double the AMD part's boost clock, although the much larger shading unit count in the AMD part more than compensates in aggregate throughput.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory at 1350 MHz with 10.8 Gbps effective speed, a 128-bit bus, and 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, a system shared bus width, and system dependent bandwidth. This means the Intel part's memory performance depends entirely on the host system's memory configuration.

Power and physical design also diverge. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has a TDP of 55 W, is a single-slot card measuring 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, and requires no power connectors. The suggested PSU is 250 W. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W, is an IGP with no slot width, no dimensions recorded, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The AMD part draws 2.2 times the power of the Intel part.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD part uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and has 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The Intel part uses an IGP bus interface and its display outputs are listed as portable device dependent. The AMD part was released on 2025-08-02, while the Intel part was released on 2026-04-15, making the Intel part the newer product by approximately eight months.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 wins decisively in raw compute throughput, memory bandwidth, and dedicated graphics resources. Its FP32 performance of 7.885 TFLOPS is roughly six times the Intel part's 1,280.0 GFLOPS. Its FP16 performance of 7.885 TFLOPS is roughly three times the Intel part's 2.560 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 70.40 GPixel/s is 3.52 times the Intel part's 20.00 GPixel/s. Its texture rate of 123.2 GTexel/s is 3.08 times the Intel part's 40.00 GTexel/s.

The AMD part also wins on memory capacity and bandwidth. It has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel part relies entirely on system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. For workloads that are memory-bound, the AMD part has a fixed, predictable memory subsystem that does not compete with the CPU for bandwidth.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile wins on power efficiency and clock speed. Its TDP of 25 W is less than half the AMD part's 55 W. Its boost clock of 2500 MHz is more than double the AMD part's 1100 MHz. For systems where power draw is the primary constraint, such as thin portable devices, the Intel part offers a lower power envelope. The Intel part is also an IGP, which means no separate card slot or power delivery is required.

The Intel part also wins on architectural novelty. It uses a 3 nm process node from Intel, compared to the AMD part's 6 nm process from TSMC. The Intel part belongs to the Xe3-LPG architecture, while the AMD part belongs to RDNA 3.0. The Intel part is part of the newer Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake) generation, and its successor relationship to HD Graphics-M indicates a lineage aimed at integrated mobile graphics.

The AMD part wins on connectivity and form factor. It provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, making it suitable for multi-monitor workstation setups. Its PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides a dedicated connection to the host system. The Intel part has display outputs dependent on the portable device, meaning its display capability varies by implementation.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 delivers 7.885 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is approximately 6.16 times the 1,280.0 GFLOPS delivered by the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile.

Q: How does memory differ between these two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses system shared memory, with memory type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system shared or system dependent.

Q: What are the TDP values for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has a TDP of 55 W, while the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W. The AMD part draws 2.2 times the power of the Intel part.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has 28 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile has 2 ray tracing cores. The AMD part has 14 times the ray tracing core count.

Q: What process nodes are used for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile uses a 3 nm process at Intel, with transistor count and die size recorded as unknown.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

The following specification fields differ between the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 and the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile:

• Chip: Navi 33 vs Wildcat Lake
• Architecture: RDNA 3.0 vs Xe3-LPG
• Codename: Hotpink Bonefish vs null
• Generation: Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) vs Arc Graphics-M (Wildcat Lake)
• Process Node: 6 nm vs 3 nm
• Foundry: TSMC vs Intel
• Transistors: 13,300 million vs unknown
• Die Size: 204 mm² vs unknown
• Transistor Density: 65.2M / mm² vs null
• Base Clock: 330 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Boost Clock: 1100 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Memory Clock: 1350 MHz 10.8 Gbps effective vs System Shared
• Memory Size: 8 GB vs System Shared
• Memory Type: GDDR6 vs System Shared
• Memory Bus Width: 128 bit vs System Shared
• Memory Bandwidth: 172.8 GB/s vs System Dependent
• Shading Units: 1792 vs 256
• TMUs: 112 vs 16
• ROPs: 64 vs 8
• RT Cores: 28 vs 2
• Pixel Rate: 70.40 GPixel/s vs 20.00 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 40.00 GTexel/s
• FP32: 7.885 TFLOPS vs 1,280.0 GFLOPS
• FP16: 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) vs 2.560 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 55 W vs 25 W
• Slot Width: Single-slot vs IGP
• Suggested PSU: 250 W vs null
• Bus Interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 vs IGP
• Display Outputs: 4x DisplayPort 2.1 vs Portable Device Dependent
• Dimensions: 168 mm x 69 mm x 20 mm vs null
• Release Date: 2025-08-02 vs 2026-04-15
• Predecessor: Radeon Pro Vega vs HD Graphics-M

Identical fields include the manufacturer's API support, specifically DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, as well as both having no power connectors, no tensor cores, no launch MSRP, and no successor listed.

The Verdict

The data separates these two GPUs into distinct usage categories. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 is a discrete, single-slot workstation card with dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory, 172.8 GB/s bandwidth, and 7.885 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. Its 28 ray tracing cores, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs provide a full complement of graphics resources. Its 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs and PCIe 4.0 x8 interface make it suitable for multi-display workstation configurations. The 55 W TDP requires a 250 W suggested PSU but remains modest for a discrete card.

The Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile is an integrated graphics processor with 256 shading units, 2 ray tracing cores, and 1,280.0 GFLOPS of FP32 compute. Its 25 W TDP and IGP form factor make it appropriate for portable devices where discrete graphics is not possible. Its 2500 MHz boost clock is high, but the small shading unit count limits aggregate throughput. Its system shared memory means performance scales with the host system's memory configuration.

The recorded data shows no benchmark scores for either GPU, so the verdict rests on specification analysis. For workloads requiring maximum compute throughput, dedicated memory bandwidth, and multi-display output, the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 is the clear choice from the data. For systems constrained to integrated graphics with a lower power envelope, the Intel Arc Graphics 2 Xe Mobile is the only option between the two. The AMD part offers 7 times the shading units, 7 times the TMUs, 8 times the ROPs, and 14 times the ray tracing cores. The Intel part offers a 3 nm process, a 2500 MHz boost clock, and a 25 W TDP. Neither GPU has recorded benchmark data, so these conclusions derive entirely from the architectural specifications in the database.