AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600S Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 against the AMD Radeon RX 7600S. The PRO W7400 has no recorded benchmark scores, while the RX 7600S carries a full set of measurements. This asymmetry shapes the entire comparison: the RX 7600S is the only one of the two with empirical performance data, and its average benchmark score of 16696 places it at the 60th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

The RX 7600S delivers its strongest results in compute-oriented workloads. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 73868 exceeds its OpenCL score of 68012, indicating that the driver stack and architecture respond well to Vulkan's lower-level execution model. The PassMark G3D score of 15408 reinforces the card's general rendering capability, while the PassMark GPU compute score of 6520 shows a separate, dedicated compute throughput that trails its graphics performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 1888 provides a modern DirectX 12 workload snapshot, and it aligns with the card's positioning as a mobile part with moderate absolute throughput.

Older DirectX paths show a different pattern. The PassMark DirectX 9 score of 211 is the highest among the legacy API tests, followed by DirectX 11 at 140, DirectX 10 at 74, and DirectX 12 at 65. The gap between DirectX 9 and DirectX 12 scores suggests that the RDNA 3.0 architecture's newer feature set does not translate into proportional gains on the older API, while the DirectX 12 result likely reflects the heavier shading and geometry workloads typical of modern titles. The PassMark G2D score of 776 covers 2D desktop and windowing operations, where the card performs adequately but not spectacularly.

The nearest rival data for the RX 7600S puts its average score in context. The NVIDIA T400 4 GB sits 0.6% above with an average score of 16792, while the NVIDIA T400 trails by 1.1% at 16508. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is 1.2% behind at 16504, and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 leads by 1.4% at 16932. These deltas are all within roughly 1.5 percentage points of each other, meaning the RX 7600S competes in a tightly clustered band where no single rival dominates by a meaningful margin. The PRO W7400 has no rivals listed, so no comparative benchmark analysis can be made for it.

Architecture Differences

Both GPUs share the same fundamental silicon. They use the Navi 33 chip, the RDNA 3.0 architecture, and the Hotpink Bonefish codename. Both are built on TSMC's 6 nm process node with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The identical chip and process mean that architectural differences are limited to how the silicon is configured, clocked, and packaged.

The PRO W7400 belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation under the Navi III Series, while the RX 7600S is part of the Radeon RX 7000 series in the Navi Mobile generation. This distinction matters for intended use. The PRO W7400 is a professional workstation part with a single-slot form factor, desktop-oriented dimensions of 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, and four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The RX 7600S is an integrated graphics processor for mobile devices, with no standalone dimensions and display outputs described as portable device dependent.

Clock behavior diverges sharply. The PRO W7400 runs a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz, while the RX 7600S runs a base clock of 1500 MHz, a game clock of 1865 MHz, and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The RX 7600S also operates its memory at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, versus the PRO W7400's 1350 MHz with 10.8 Gbps effective. These clock differences cascade into every throughput metric.

The memory subsystem is identical in capacity, type, and bus width: 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit interface. However, the RX 7600S achieves 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth versus 172.8 GB/s for the PRO W7400, a direct consequence of the higher memory clock. The compute resources are also identical in count: 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 28 ray tracing cores. Neither card has tensor cores. The architectural feature set matches as well, with both supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600S wins on every measurable performance axis. Its pixel rate of 140.8 GPixel/s doubles the PRO W7400's 70.40 GPixel/s. Its texture rate of 246.4 GTexel/s is exactly double the PRO W7400's 123.2 GTexel/s. Its FP32 throughput of 15.77 TFLOPS is exactly double the PRO W7400's 7.885 TFLOPS. The RX 7600S also delivers FP16 at 31.54 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, whereas the PRO W7400 manages only 7.885 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The RX 7600S therefore provides four times the FP16 throughput of the PRO W7400, a significant advantage for workloads that can use packed math.

The PRO W7400 wins on power efficiency in absolute terms. Its TDP of 55 W is lower than the RX 7600S's 75 W, and its suggested power supply of 250 W is defined, while the RX 7600S has no suggested PSU value because it is an integrated mobile part. The PRO W7400 also wins on physical integration for desktop workstations: it is a single-slot card with dedicated DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, making it a drop-in solution for multi-display professional setups. The RX 7600S, as an IGP, depends entirely on the host laptop's design for its display connectivity.

For professional use cases, the PRO W7400's lower clocks and power draw may suit compact or passively cooled workstation chassis, but its performance ceiling is far lower. The RX 7600S, despite being a mobile part, is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark evidence of usable gaming and compute performance. The PRO W7400's lack of any benchmark scores means the database records no measured wins for it at all.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in the following recorded fields. The PRO W7400 has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz; the RX 7600S has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a game clock of 1865 MHz, and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. Memory clock differs: 1350 MHz with 10.8 Gbps effective for the PRO W7400, versus 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective for the RX 7600S. Memory bandwidth is 172.8 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s. Pixel rate is 70.40 GPixel/s versus 140.8 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 123.2 GTexel/s versus 246.4 GTexel/s. FP32 is 7.885 TFLOPS versus 15.77 TFLOPS. FP16 is 7.885 TFLOPS at 1:1 versus 31.54 TFLOPS at 2:1. TDP is 55 W versus 75 W.

The slot width differs: single-slot for the PRO W7400, IGP for the RX 7600S. The bus interface differs: PCIe 4.0 x8 for the PRO W7400, PCIe 4.0 x16 for the RX 7600S. Display outputs differ: 4x DisplayPort 2.1 for the PRO W7400, portable device dependent for the RX 7600S. Physical dimensions exist only for the PRO W7400: 168 mm length, 69 mm height, 20 mm width. The RX 7600S has no recorded dimensions. The suggested PSU is 250 W for the PRO W7400 and null for the RX 7600S. The release dates differ: the PRO W7400 was released on 2025-08-02, while the RX 7600S was released on 2023-01-03. The predecessor differs: Radeon Pro Vega for the PRO W7400, Polaris Mobile for the RX 7600S.

The two cards share identical values for transistors, die size, transistor density, process node, foundry, memory size, memory type, memory bus width, shading units, TMUs, ROPs, ray tracing cores, tensor cores (both null), DirectX support, OpenGL support, and Vulkan support.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S delivers 15.77 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, exactly double the AMD Radeon PRO W7400's 7.885 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput of 31.54 TFLOPS is four times the PRO W7400's 7.885 TFLOPS.

Q: Do the two cards use the same chip?

A: Yes. Both use the Navi 33 chip with the RDNA 3.0 architecture and the Hotpink Bonefish codename, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die.

Q: How does memory bandwidth compare?

A: The RX 7600S reaches 256.0 GB/s, while the PRO W7400 reaches 172.8 GB/s. Both have 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus, but the RX 7600S runs its memory at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed versus 1350 MHz with 10.8 Gbps effective.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The PRO W7400 has a TDP of 55 W and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The RX 7600S has a TDP of 75 W and no suggested PSU value, as it is an integrated mobile part.

Q: Which card has benchmark scores in the database?

A: Only the RX 7600S has recorded benchmarks. Its average benchmark score is 16696, placing it at the 60th percentile of all GPUs. The PRO W7400 has no benchmark scores and no nearest rivals listed.

Q: How does the RX 7600S compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It sits within a tight band. The NVIDIA T400 4 GB is 0.6% higher, the NVIDIA T400 is 1.1% lower, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is 1.2% lower, and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 is 1.4% higher.

The Verdict

The RX 7600S is the clear performance leader in every measured metric. It doubles the PRO W7400's pixel rate, texture rate, and FP32 throughput, quadruples its FP16 throughput, and provides 48% more memory bandwidth. Its average benchmark score of 16696 confirms that it is a functional, competitive mobile GPU, while the PRO W7400 has no recorded benchmark data at all. Any workload that depends on raw throughput, modern API performance, or compute density should favor the RX 7600S.

The PRO W7400 is the better fit for a specific physical configuration. Its single-slot design, 168 mm length, four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, and 55 W TDP make it a straightforward choice for a compact workstation where space and power are constrained. Its PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is narrower than the RX 7600S's PCIe 4.0 x16, but that matters less in a professional desktop context than in a mobile one. The PRO W7400's lack of benchmarks means the database cannot confirm any performance advantage for it, so its appeal rests entirely on form factor and power draw.

The data supports a simple split: choose the RX 7600S for performance, choose the PRO W7400 for slot compatibility and display connectivity. The RX 7600S belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series and the Navi Mobile generation, making it a laptop-oriented part. The PRO W7400 belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, making it a workstation-oriented part. The RX 7600S was released on 2023-01-03, while the PRO W7400 followed on 2025-08-02, but the newer release does not change the fact that its silicon is clocked far lower and its measured performance is absent.