AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc Pro B65 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains benchmark results for the AMD Radeon PRO V710, while the Intel Arc Pro B65 currently has no benchmark entries. This absence of data for the Intel card is itself a significant finding. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has an average benchmark score of 58,657, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs tracked in the database. The Intel Arc Pro B65, by contrast, holds a 50th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of zero, reflecting the lack of measured performance data.

In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 records a score of 853. This workload, which stresses modern DirectX 12 rendering paths, produces a measurable result for the AMD card. The Intel Arc Pro B65 has no corresponding entry in the database, so no direct numerical comparison is possible for this specific test.

The Geekbench OpenCL test shows the AMD Radeon PRO V710 achieving 116,460 points. OpenCL performance is relevant for compute-oriented professional workloads, and this score provides a reference point for the AMD card's general-purpose processing capability. Again, the Intel card has no recorded value.

The nearest rivals for the AMD Radeon PRO V710 offer context for its standing. The NVIDIA P102-100 averages 58,528, which is 0.2% behind the AMD card. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT averages 58,392, a 0.5% deficit. The Intel Arc A570M averages 58,239, trailing by 0.7%. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58,085, sitting 1.0% behind. These deltas are remarkably small, indicating that the Radeon PRO V710 sits in a tightly clustered performance band. The largest gap among these four rivals is just 1.0%, which suggests that in aggregate benchmark terms, the AMD card is effectively at parity with a range of other GPUs from both AMD and competing manufacturers.

The Intel Arc Pro B65 has no nearest rivals listed in the database. This means no comparative deltas can be calculated for it. The absence of both benchmark scores and rival comparisons makes quantitative positioning impossible for the Intel card at this time.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon PRO V710 compare to the Intel Arc Pro B65 in benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has an average benchmark score of 58,657 and sits in the 88th percentile. The Intel Arc Pro B65 has an average benchmark score of zero and holds the 50th percentile. No head-to-head benchmark entries exist between the two cards in the database.

Q: What is the closest rival to the AMD Radeon PRO V710?

A: The NVIDIA P102-100 is the closest, with an average score of 58,528, which is 0.2% behind the AMD card. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT follows at 0.5% behind, then the Intel Arc A570M at 0.7% behind, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 1.0% behind.

Q: Which card has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B65 has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 608.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 compute figures for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 performance with a 1:1 FP16 ratio. The Intel Arc Pro B65 delivers 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 with a 2:1 FP16 ratio (24.58 TFLOPS FP16).

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What are the display output capabilities?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B65 provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has no display outputs, indicating it is designed for compute or server deployments rather than workstation display use.

Architecture Differences

The two cards use fundamentally different GPU architectures. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is built on RDNA 3.0 with the Navi 32 chip and the codename Wheat Nas, belonging to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The Intel Arc Pro B65 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture with the BMG-G21 chip and belongs to the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation.

Both are fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the die characteristics differ substantially. The AMD chip contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel chip contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, resulting in a density of 72.1 million transistors per square millimeter. The AMD chip is both larger in area and denser in transistor packing.

The execution resource configuration diverges significantly. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 54 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc Pro B65 has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 ray tracing cores. The AMD card leads in every one of these categories, with 35% more shading units, 35% more TMUs, 20% more ROPs, and 170% more ray tracing cores.

Clock behavior also differs. The AMD card runs at a 1900 MHz base clock and a 2000 MHz boost clock. The Intel card has a fixed 2400 MHz clock for both base and boost. This means the Intel card operates at a 400 MHz higher boost clock, but the AMD card compensates with its wider execution resources.

Memory architecture shows the Intel card with an advantage in raw capacity and bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B65 has 32 GB on a 256-bit bus with 608.0 GB/s bandwidth and memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The AMD card has 28 GB on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth and memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel card holds a 124 GB/s bandwidth advantage.

The PCIe interface differs by generation. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Intel card uses PCIe 5.0 x16. This gives the Intel card a newer bus interface, though the practical impact depends on platform support and workload characteristics.

Power requirements show the AMD card as the more efficient of the two. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W with a suggested power supply of 450 W. The Intel Arc Pro B65 has a TDP of 200 W with a suggested power supply of 550 W. The Intel card consumes 42 W more and requires a 100 W larger power supply recommendation. Both use a single 8-pin power connector. Physical dimensions differ in slot width: the AMD card is single-slot, while the Intel card is dual-slot.

The production status field shows the Intel Arc Pro B65 as active, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 has no production status recorded. Release dates place the AMD card at October 2, 2024, and the Intel card at March 31, 2026.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a clear asymmetry. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has substantial benchmark coverage, including a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 853 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 116,460, along with an 88th percentile ranking and an average score of 58,657. The Intel Arc Pro B65 has no benchmark entries, no rival comparisons, and a 50th percentile ranking with an average score of zero.

For compute-intensive workloads, the AMD card holds a commanding FP32 lead at 27.65 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS. Its FP16 output matches FP32 at 27.65 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel card reaches 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The AMD card also leads in shading units, TMUs, ROPs, and ray tracing cores, which points toward stronger raw geometry and pixel throughput. Its pixel rate matches the Intel card at 192.0 GPixel/s, but its texture rate of 432.0 GTexel/s exceeds the Intel card's 384.0 GTexel/s.

The Intel Arc Pro B65 offers advantages in memory capacity and bandwidth, with 32 GB versus 28 GB and 608.0 GB/s versus 504.0 GB/s. It also provides display outputs, 4x DisplayPort 2.1, while the AMD card has none. The Intel card has a higher boost clock at 2400 MHz versus 2000 MHz and a newer PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

The database indicates the AMD card is the measured performer, with validated scores and rival positioning. The Intel card is currently unmeasured, leaving its actual performance unquantified. Based on the data available, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the card with demonstrated benchmark results, while the Intel Arc Pro B65 remains a specification-only entry with no recorded performance evidence. Users requiring display outputs would favor the Intel card based on its 4x DisplayPort 2.1 configuration, while those prioritizing measured compute performance would look to the AMD card.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO V710 | Intel Arc Pro B65 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe2-HPG |

| Chip | Navi 32 | BMG-G21 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 28,100 million | 19,600 million |

| Die Size | 346 mm² | 272 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 81.2M / mm² | 72.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1900 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Memory Size | 28 GB | 32 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 224 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 504.0 GB/s | 608.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 3456 | 2560 |

| TMUs | 216 | 160 |

| ROPs | 96 | 80 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 54 | 20 |

| Pixel Rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 432.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 27.65 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) | 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 158 W | 200 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Release Date | 2024-10-02 | 2026-03-31 |

| Production Status | Not recorded | Active |

The two cards share identical DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support. Both are single 8-pin connector designs. The AMD card uses a smaller 224-bit memory bus with lower bandwidth, while the Intel card uses a wider 256-bit bus with higher bandwidth. The AMD card leads in compute resources and transistor count, while the Intel card leads in memory capacity, bandwidth, clock speed, and interface generation.