AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc Pro B390 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data available for this comparison is decidedly one-sided. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has recorded scores in two distinct tests, while the Intel Arc Pro B390 currently has no benchmark entries in the database. This absence of recorded measurements for the Intel part makes a direct numerical comparison impossible, but the available data for the AMD card establishes a clear performance baseline that the Intel product cannot yet be measured against.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 posts a score of 853 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This result, while moderate in absolute terms, places the card in the 88th percentile of all GPUs tracked by the database. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the same card delivers a substantially stronger showing with a score of 116,460. This OpenCL result drives the average benchmark score to 58,657, which positions the card within a tight cluster of comparable GPUs.

The nearest rivals to the AMD Radeon PRO V710, based on average benchmark scores, are all within a narrow margin. The NVIDIA P102-100 sits closest with an average score of 58,528, a delta of only 0.2 percent. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT follows at 58,392, a 0.5 percent gap. Intel's own Arc A570M records 58,239, a 0.7 percent difference, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM trails at 58,085, a 1 percent gap. These margins are small, indicating that the Radeon PRO V710 performs at a level consistent with a broad tier of established graphics hardware.

Because the Intel Arc Pro B390 has no recorded benchmarks, its average benchmark score is listed as zero and its percentile ranking sits at 50. This does not mean the Intel part is incapable; rather, it reflects the absence of measured data in the database. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the win count for each product is zero on both sides. Any claim about relative performance between these two specific products must therefore rest on architectural analysis and specification differences rather than direct test results.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 demonstrably wins in every category where measurement exists. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 116,460 are the only recorded performance data points in this comparison. The 88th percentile ranking among all GPUs further confirms that the card sits comfortably above the median in the database's performance distribution.

The Intel Arc Pro B390, by contrast, has no recorded wins because it has no recorded scores. Its 50th percentile ranking is a neutral placeholder, not an indication of measured performance. The card's specifications suggest it is designed for a fundamentally different role, one where raw benchmark scores may not be the primary metric of success. Its integrated graphics processor (IGP) form factor, combined with portable device dependent display outputs, indicates a target application in mobile or compact systems rather than standalone workstation or desktop configurations.

For compute-heavy workloads, the AMD card's FP32 throughput of 27.65 TFLOPS provides a strong foundation. The Intel part delivers 7.680 TFLOPS in FP32, a figure that places it in a lower tier of raw compute capability. However, the Intel card's FP16 performance of 15.36 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio suggests it can handle certain mixed-precision workloads with reasonable efficiency, even if its absolute throughput remains lower.

Memory capacity is another clear differentiator. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 features 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses system shared memory, with bandwidth described as system dependent. This means the Intel part's memory performance is contingent on the host platform, whereas the AMD card has dedicated, consistent memory resources.

Architecture Differences

The two products come from different manufacturers and employ distinct architectural approaches. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi III Series. The chip is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2 million per square millimeter.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses the Panther Lake chip built on the Xe3-LPG architecture, belonging to the Arc Graphics-WM generation under the Panther Lake family. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The transistor count and die size for this chip are both listed as unknown in the database, and transistor density is not recorded.

The AMD card provides 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. It includes 54 ray tracing cores. The Intel part offers 1,536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, with 12 ray tracing cores. In every compute resource category, the AMD card holds a numerical advantage, typically by a factor of two or more.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 runs at a base clock of 1900 MHz with a boost clock of 2000 MHz, while its memory operates at 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has a much lower base clock of 300 MHz but a higher boost clock of 2500 MHz. This wide range suggests aggressive power management for the Intel part, ramping up when needed and idling at very low frequencies when not.

The AMD card's pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 432.0 GTexel/s. The Intel part achieves 60.00 GPixel/s and 120.0 GTexel/s respectively. These rates reflect the underlying resource counts and clock behavior.

Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the Intel part is an IGP with no separate bus interface. Power requirements also diverge sharply: the AMD card has a TDP of 158 W with a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 450 W, whereas the Intel part has a TDP of 80 W, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU listed.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 3,456 shading units, while the Intel Arc Pro B390 has 1,536.

Q: What memory configuration does each card use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B390 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: How do the FP32 compute performances compare?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The Intel Arc Pro B390 delivers 7.680 TFLOPS.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the form factor of each product?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is a single-slot card with one 8-pin power connector and no display outputs. The Intel Arc Pro B390 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors and portable device dependent display outputs.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B390 has a boost clock of 2500 MHz, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 boosts to 2000 MHz. However, the AMD card has a much higher base clock of 1900 MHz compared to 300 MHz for the Intel part.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every recorded specification. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the Intel Arc Pro B390 uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture. The AMD card is built on a 5 nm TSMC process, the Intel part on a 3 nm Intel process. The AMD chip contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, while the Intel chip's transistor count and die size are unknown.

Clock specifications diverge as well. The AMD card has a 1900 MHz base clock and a 2000 MHz boost clock, with memory at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. The Intel card has a 300 MHz base clock and a 2500 MHz boost clock, with system shared memory.

Memory capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth all differ. The AMD card offers 28 GB GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel card uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Compute resources differ by roughly a factor of two to four. The AMD card has 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 54 ray tracing cores. The Intel card has 1,536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 24 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 60.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 432.0 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 27.65 TFLOPS versus 7.680 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 27.65 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio versus 15.36 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

Power and physical specifications also differ. The AMD card has a 158 W TDP, single-slot form factor, one 8-pin connector, and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Intel card has an 80 W TDP, IGP form factor, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The AMD card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface and has no display outputs, while the Intel card is an IGP with portable device dependent display outputs.

Release dates differ by more than a year. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 was released on October 2, 2024. The Intel Arc Pro B390 was released on January 26, 2026. The AMD card's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, while the Intel card's predecessor is the HD Graphics-WM. The Intel card has an active production status, while the AMD card's production status is not recorded.

The Verdict

The data in the database points to two products designed for entirely different segments. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is a discrete, single-slot workstation card with dedicated memory, substantial compute resources, and a recorded performance profile that places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus provides 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and its 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 performance makes it suitable for compute-intensive workloads where dedicated memory and consistent throughput matter.

The Intel Arc Pro B390 is an integrated graphics processor built for portable devices. It has no recorded benchmarks, no dedicated memory, and its performance is system dependent. Its 80 W TDP and IGP form factor indicate a power-efficient design intended for mobile contexts rather than standalone graphics tasks. The 3 nm Intel process and 2500 MHz boost clock suggest Intel has focused on efficiency and burst performance within tight power envelopes.

For users who need a discrete GPU with dedicated memory and measured performance, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the only option with supporting data. The Intel Arc Pro B390 cannot be evaluated on performance grounds because no measurements exist. Its role is defined by its specifications: an integrated solution for portable systems where the host platform provides memory and display functionality.

The AMD card's nearest rivals, all within 1 percent of its average benchmark score, include the NVIDIA P102-100, AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, Intel Arc A570M, and AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM. This clustering indicates the Radeon PRO V710 delivers performance consistent with a well-established tier of graphics hardware. The Intel Arc Pro B390 has no rival data, reinforcing its status as a product outside the discrete GPU comparison space.

The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers measurable, competitive performance in its class. The Intel Arc Pro B390 offers an integrated alternative with lower power draw and a more recent manufacturing process, but its performance remains unquantified in the database. Selection between the two should be driven by form factor and power requirements, not benchmark scores, because only one product has any.