AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc G3 Extreme Comparison

AMD Radeon PRO V710 and Intel Arc G3 Extreme occupy opposite ends of the graphics hardware spectrum, and the recorded data reflects that divide. The AMD part is a discrete, high-throughput workstation accelerator, while the Intel part is an integrated GPU built for a mobile processor. Benchmark results place the Radeon PRO V710 in the 88th percentile among all GPUs, whereas the Arc G3 Extreme sits at the 50th percentile. The average benchmark score for the AMD card is 58,657, while the Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, leaving its performance unquantified.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries comparing these two products. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 does have two recorded test results: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 116,460. The Intel Arc G3 Extreme has zero benchmark entries. The wins counter shows 0 for both sides because no shared test exists.

Without a common test, the nearest rivals of the Radeon PRO V710 provide the only comparative context. Its average benchmark score of 58,657 sits 0.2% above the NVIDIA P102-100, which scores 58,528. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT trails by 0.5% with an average of 58,392. The Intel Arc A570M is 0.7% behind at 58,239, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM is 1% lower at 58,085. These deltas are small, indicating the Radeon PRO V710 clusters tightly with a range of discrete GPUs across vendors.

The Geekbench OpenCL result of 116,460 points to strong general compute performance for the Radeon PRO V710, consistent with its 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 853 reflects its DirectX 12 Ultimate capability. For the Intel Arc G3 Extreme, the absence of any recorded scores means no quantitative comparison is possible. The data shows the Intel part is not yet benchmarked, so any head-to-head analysis must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than measured results.

The Verdict

The data clearly separates these two products by role and capability. The AMD Radeon PRO V710, released on 2024-10-02, is a single-slot discrete accelerator with 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units process graphics at a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 432.0 GTexel/s. The 54 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing within the RDNA 3.0 architecture.

The Intel Arc G3 Extreme, with a release date of 2026-05-31 and an active production status, is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built into the Panther Lake chip. It uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, meaning its memory performance cannot be specified independently. It has 1,536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 60.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 120.0 GTexel/s. Its FP32 compute is 7.680 TFLOPS, which is about 27.8% of the Radeon PRO V710's 27.65 TFLOPS. FP16 throughput on the Intel part is 15.36 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, while the AMD part achieves 27.65 TFLOPS at 1:1.

A buyer needing a discrete accelerator for workstation workloads, high-bandwidth memory, and substantial compute throughput should choose the AMD Radeon PRO V710 based on its benchmark presence and specification sheet. The Intel Arc G3 Extreme suits a system where integrated graphics are sufficient, given its 80 W TDP and lack of power connectors. The Radeon PRO V710 has a 158 W TDP and requires a single 8-pin connector, plus a suggested 450 W PSU. The Intel part draws no additional power beyond the host processor.

The percentile ranking reinforces this split. The Radeon PRO V710's 88th percentile versus all GPUs indicates it outperforms most recorded graphics hardware. The Arc G3 Extreme's 50th percentile places it at the median, but with no benchmark scores, that percentile is based on its specifications alone. The data does not support a recommendation for the Intel part in compute-heavy scenarios; it exists for portable, low-power integration.

Architecture Differences

The Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip with the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The chip is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². This is a large, complex die designed for high throughput and workstation reliability.

The Intel Arc G3 Extreme uses the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation. It is built on Intel's 3 nm process. The transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, so no density figure exists. The architecture targets integrated graphics within a mobile processor, prioritizing power efficiency over raw performance.

The Radeon PRO V710 implements ray tracing with 54 RT cores, while the Intel part has 12 RT cores. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API-level feature parity exists. The RDNA 3.0 architecture uses a 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, meaning it does not double FP16 throughput. The Xe3-LPG architecture uses a 2:1 ratio, doubling FP16 relative to FP32, which indicates different compute prioritization.

The foundry and process node differences are stark: TSMC 5 nm versus Intel 3 nm. The AMD die is known and substantial at 346 mm², while the Intel die is unknown, typical of an integrated solution where the GPU shares the package with CPU cores. The memory architecture differs fundamentally: the Radeon PRO V710 has dedicated GDDR6, while the Arc G3 Extreme relies on system shared memory, making bandwidth system dependent.

Specification Differences

Clock speeds diverge sharply. The Radeon PRO V710 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel Arc G3 Extreme has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, with memory clock listed as system shared. The AMD part's higher base clock reflects a discrete card designed to run continuously at high frequency, while the Intel part's low base clock and high boost clock suit burst workloads in a power-constrained mobile environment.

Memory capacity and bandwidth favor AMD overwhelmingly. The Radeon PRO V710 offers 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus, achieving 504.0 GB/s. The Arc G3 Extreme has system shared memory with no fixed size, type, bus width, or bandwidth; all are system dependent. This makes the Intel part unsuitable for memory-intensive tasks like large dataset rendering or high-resolution texture workloads.

Shading units, TMUs, and ROPs all favor AMD. The Radeon PRO V710 has 3,456 shading units versus 1,536 on the Intel part, 216 TMUs versus 48, and 96 ROPs versus 24. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 60.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 432.0 GTexel/s versus 120.0 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 27.65 TFLOPS versus 7.680 TFLOPS. FP16 is 27.65 TFLOPS versus 15.36 TFLOPS.

Power and physical design differ completely. The Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W, is single-slot, and uses one 8-pin power connector with a suggested 450 W PSU. The Arc G3 Extreme has an 80 W TDP, is an IGP, uses no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for AMD and IGP for Intel. Display outputs: the Radeon PRO V710 has no outputs, meaning it is a compute or render accelerator, while the Intel part has portable device dependent outputs, typical for a laptop or handheld. The Radeon PRO V710 has no production status listed, while the Arc G3 Extreme is active. The Radeon PRO V710 lists a predecessor, Radeon Pro Vega, while the Intel part does not. Neither has a successor in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32, while the Intel Arc G3 Extreme delivers 7.680 TFLOPS. The AMD part is approximately 3.6 times higher.

Q: What memory configuration does each product use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc G3 Extreme uses system shared memory with a bus width of system shared and bandwidth listed as system dependent.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How many ray tracing cores does each GPU have?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 54 RT cores. The Intel Arc G3 Extreme has 12 RT cores.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector with a suggested 450 W PSU. The Intel Arc G3 Extreme has a TDP of 80 W and uses no power connectors.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores for the Intel Arc G3 Extreme?

A: No, the database lists no benchmarks for the Intel Arc G3 Extreme. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 116,460.

The recorded data paints a clear picture of two products built for different purposes. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is a high-bandwidth, high-compute discrete accelerator with substantial memory and a strong benchmark presence. The Intel Arc G3 Extreme is a low-power integrated GPU with no measured performance data. The benchmark database ranks the AMD part at the 88th percentile, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero due to missing tests. For any workload requiring dedicated memory bandwidth or sustained compute, the AMD part stands alone in the data. The Intel part exists as an integrated solution for portable systems, but its performance remains unverified in the database.