AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Arc A310E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a stark contrast between these two processors, though direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are not available in the database. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 853, while the Intel Arc A310E has no recorded benchmark entries. In Geekbench OpenCL, the AMD part scores 116460, a figure that positions it well above the Intel card's unmeasured performance tier.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 holds an 88th percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 58657. The Intel Arc A310E sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero, reflecting the absence of recorded test data. This percentile gap indicates the AMD card outperforms the Intel part in every measurable category, but the lack of Intel benchmark results means the exact delta cannot be quantified from the available information.

The nearest rivals for the AMD Radeon PRO V710 provide context for its standing. The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58528, which is 0.2% behind the AMD card. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58392, 0.5% behind. The Intel Arc A570M scores 58239, 0.7% behind, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58085, 1% behind. These narrow margins show the PRO V710 sits at the top of a tightly clustered group, with its nearest competitors all within a single percentage point.

The compute throughput difference is substantial. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Arc A310E offers 3.072 TFLOPS. That is approximately nine times higher FP32 throughput for the AMD card. In FP16, the AMD part again posts 27.65 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel card achieves 6.144 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, meaning the AMD card maintains its lead even in reduced-precision workloads.

Pixel and texture throughput follow the same pattern. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 reaches 192.0 GPixel/s and 432.0 GTexel/s, compared to 32.00 GPixel/s and 64.00 GTexel/s for the Intel Arc A310E. The AMD card delivers six times the pixel fill rate and nearly seven times the texture fill rate, confirming its advantage in rasterization-heavy tasks.

Memory bandwidth amplifies the performance gap. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus, achieving 504.0 GB/s. The Intel Arc A310E uses 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, achieving 124.0 GB/s. The AMD card provides over four times the memory bandwidth, which directly impacts throughput in large dataset workloads common in professional rendering and compute applications.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has an average benchmark score of 58657, while the Intel Arc A310E has an average score of 0 due to no recorded benchmark entries.

Q: What is the difference in FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Arc A310E delivers 3.072 TFLOPS, making the AMD card approximately nine times faster in this metric.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus with 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What percentile rankings do these cards hold?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 ranks in the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Intel Arc A310E ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Which card has more shading units and ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 3456 shading units and 54 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc A310E has 768 shading units and 6 ray tracing cores.

Q: What are the power consumption figures?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Intel Arc A310E has a TDP of 75 W with a suggested PSU of 250 W.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Wheat Nas, and belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 28,100 million transistors packed into a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2M per mm².

The Intel Arc A310E uses the DG2-128 chip built on Xe-HPG architecture and belongs to the Alchemist (Arc 3) generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 45.9M per mm².

The shader array configuration differs substantially. The AMD card contains 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. The Intel card contains 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. Ray tracing hardware also diverges, with the AMD card featuring 54 dedicated ray tracing cores versus 6 on the Intel part.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 operates with a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The Intel Arc A310E runs at a fixed 2000 MHz for both base and boost clocks. Memory clocks also differ, with the AMD card running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and the Intel card at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

The bus interface represents another architectural distinction. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Intel Arc A310E uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility matches.

Physical design diverges as well. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is a single-slot card with one 8-pin power connector and no display outputs, indicating a compute-oriented or server deployment. The Intel Arc A310E is also single-slot but draws power directly from the PCIe slot with no external connectors and includes 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, making it suitable for display workloads.

The Intel Arc A310E is marked as end-of-life in production status, with its successor listed as Battlemage and its predecessor as Xe Graphics. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 lists its predecessor as Radeon Pro Vega with no successor recorded, and its release date is 2024-10-02. The Intel card was released earlier on 2024-03-31.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 and Intel Arc A310E differ across nearly every recorded specification field. Process node differs: 5 nm for AMD versus 6 nm for Intel. Transistor count differs: 28,100 million versus 7,200 million. Die size differs: 346 mm² versus 157 mm². Transistor density differs: 81.2M per mm² versus 45.9M per mm².

Clocks differ in base frequency (1900 MHz versus 2000 MHz), boost frequency (2000 MHz versus 2000 MHz, matching), and memory clock (2250 MHz versus 1937 MHz). Memory size differs: 28 GB versus 4 GB. Memory bus width differs: 224 bit versus 64 bit. Memory bandwidth differs: 504.0 GB/s versus 124.0 GB/s.

Compute resources differ in shading units (3456 versus 768), TMUs (216 versus 32), ROPs (96 versus 16), and ray tracing cores (54 versus 6). Pixel rate differs: 192.0 GPixel/s versus 32.00 GPixel/s. Texture rate differs: 432.0 GTexel/s versus 64.00 GTexel/s. FP32 performance differs: 27.65 TFLOPS versus 3.072 TFLOPS. FP16 performance differs: 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power specifications differ: TDP of 158 W versus 75 W, power connectors of 1x 8-pin versus none, and suggested PSU of 450 W versus 250 W. Bus interface differs: PCIe 4.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x8. Display outputs differ: none versus 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0.

Physical dimensions are recorded only for the Intel Arc A310E: 168 mm length, 69 mm height, and 20 mm width. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has no recorded dimensions. Production status differs: the Intel card is end-of-life, while the AMD card has no recorded status. Release dates differ: 2024-10-02 for AMD versus 2024-03-31 for Intel. Predecessors differ: Radeon Pro Vega versus Xe Graphics. Successors differ: none recorded versus Battlemage.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins in every recorded performance category. Its 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 504.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 28 GB capacity position it for compute-heavy workloads such as large-scale rendering, scientific simulation, and machine learning inference. The 88th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 58657, with nearest rivals within 1%, confirm it sits at the top of its performance class.

The Intel Arc A310E wins in power efficiency and physical integration. Its 75 W TDP requires no external power connectors, drawing all power from the PCIe slot, and its 250 W suggested PSU makes it compatible with minimal power delivery infrastructure. The compact dimensions of 168 mm by 69 mm by 20 mm and single-slot design allow deployment in space-constrained systems. The inclusion of 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs gives it a clear advantage for display-centric applications where the AMD card offers no video outputs at all.

The Intel card also wins on clock frequency at the base level, running at 2000 MHz versus the AMD card's 1900 MHz base clock, though both boost to 2000 MHz. This higher base clock does not compensate for the massive differences in shader count, memory width, and compute resources, but it indicates the Intel part maintains a higher minimum operating frequency.

For workloads requiring FP16 with 2:1 ratio, the Intel Arc A310E achieves 6.144 TFLOPS, which is half its FP32 output, while the AMD card maintains a 1:1 ratio at 27.65 TFLOPS. The AMD card still delivers over four times the FP16 throughput, but the Intel architecture's ratio suggests a different optimization priority.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710's lack of display outputs makes it unsuitable for direct video output tasks, while the Intel Arc A310E's four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 connections serve multi-monitor setups. Conversely, the Intel card's 4 GB memory capacity and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth limit its effectiveness in large dataset workloads where the AMD card's 28 GB and 504.0 GB/s provide substantial headroom.

The database records no head-to-head benchmark wins for either card, but the available metrics consistently favor the AMD Radeon PRO V710 in raw performance, while the Intel Arc A310E demonstrates advantages in power draw, physical footprint, and display connectivity. The AMD card's 88th percentile ranking versus the Intel card's 50th percentile ranking encapsulates the overall performance hierarchy, with the caveat that the Intel card has no recorded benchmark scores to provide a direct comparison.