AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE Comparison

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 and AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE represent two distinct philosophies from the same manufacturer, and the benchmark data reveals a fascinating split. The PRO V710, built on RDNA 3.0 with a 5 nm process, is clearly engineered for compute-heavy workloads, while the RX 9070 GRE, on newer RDNA 4.0 and a 4 nm node, targets rasterization performance. The head-to-head results show a decisive victory for each card in its own domain, making the choice between them less about overall superiority and more about the specific task at hand. The data presents a clear narrative: one card is a specialized tool, the other a general-purpose performer.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking disparity emerges in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE dominates with a score of 5424, compared to the PRO V710's 853. This is a massive delta of -84.3% from the perspective of the V710, indicating that the RX 9070 GRE is over six times faster in this synthetic gaming and directX 12 workload. This result is not a marginal victory; it is a complete rout, highlighting the RX 9070 GRE's architectural focus on peak graphics throughput. The V710's score of 853 places it in a completely different performance tier for this specific benchmark, suggesting it is not designed for real-time 3D rendering at high frame rates.

However, the narrative flips entirely in the Geekbench OpenCL test, which measures general-purpose compute performance. Here, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 116460, while the RX 9070 GRE trails with 109309. The V710's advantage is 6.5%, a solid lead that demonstrates its strength in parallel processing tasks that are common in scientific, AI, and content-creation applications. This is a significant win for the professional card, showing that despite its lower raw graphics score, it can outperform its consumer counterpart when the workload is compute-bound. The fact that the V710 wins this test with fewer shading units (3456 vs 3072 for the RX 9070 GRE) suggests its architecture is more efficient for certain types of calculations.

Looking at the broader average benchmark scores, the two cards are remarkably close overall. The PRO V710 has an average score of 58657, while the RX 9070 GRE sits at 57367. This puts the V710 slightly ahead, but the difference is less than 3%. The nearest rivals for the V710 include the NVIDIA P102-100 (deltaPct 0.2), the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (deltaPct 0.5), and the Intel Arc A570M (deltaPct 0.7), showing that it performs in a very tight cluster with those GPUs. The RX 9070 GRE's nearest rivals are the Intel Arc A580 (deltaPct -0.7), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (deltaPct -1.2), and the Intel Arc A570M (deltaPct -1.5), indicating it is slightly below these cards in average scoring. This paints a picture of two GPUs that are statistically similar in aggregate performance but wildly different in specific workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which card is faster in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is overwhelmingly faster, scoring 5424 versus the PRO V710's 853. This represents an 84.3% higher score for the RX 9070 GRE, making it the clear choice for this DirectX 12 graphics test.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon PRO V710 have any benchmark advantage?

A: Yes, in the Geekbench OpenCL compute test, the PRO V710 scores 116460, which is 6.5% higher than the RX 9070 GRE's 109309. This indicates a lead in general-purpose GPU compute tasks.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The PRO V710 has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 58657, compared to the RX 9070 GRE's 57367. The V710 also holds a higher percentile rank at 88 versus the RX 9070 GRE's 87.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The RX 9070 GRE has a significantly higher boost clock at 2790 MHz, while the PRO V710's boost clock is 2000 MHz. This contributes to the RX 9070 GRE's superior performance in graphics-intensive tests.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for each card based on average score?

A: The PRO V710's closest rival is the NVIDIA P102-100, with a deltaPct of 0.2. The RX 9070 GRE's closest rival is the Intel Arc A580, which is 0.7% faster than it.

Q: Which card has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The PRO V710 has a higher memory bandwidth of 504.0 GB/s, compared to the RX 9070 GRE's 432.0 GB/s. This is despite the RX 9070 GRE having a newer memory interface.

Architecture Differences

The architectural chasm between these two GPUs is the primary driver of their divergent benchmark results. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 32 chip, which is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 81.2M / mm². In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses the newer RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 48 chip, manufactured on a more advanced 4 nm process. This chip packs 53,900 million transistors onto a 357 mm² die, achieving a much higher transistor density of 151.0M / mm². This generational leap in process technology and transistor count is foundational to their performance differences.

The core configurations also differ significantly. The PRO V710 has 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 96 render output units (ROPs), along with 54 ray tracing cores. The RX 9070 GRE, despite having fewer shading units (3072) and TMUs (192), still has 96 ROPs and 48 ray tracing cores. This means the V710 has 384 more shading units and 24 more TMUs, but 6 fewer RT cores. The RX 9070 GRE compensates with a much higher boost clock of 2790 MHz compared to the V710's 2000 MHz, and a game clock of 2220 MHz. This clock speed advantage is why the RX 9070 GRE achieves a pixel rate of 267.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 535.7 GTexel/s, both substantially higher than the V710's 192.0 GPixel/s and 432.0 GTexel/s.

The memory subsystems are also architected differently. Both use GDDR6, but the PRO V710 offers a massive 28 GB on a 224-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 504.0 GB/s. The RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s. This shows that the V710 prioritizes capacity and bandwidth, likely for large datasets in professional workloads, while the RX 9070 GRE focuses on lower latency and higher clocks for gaming. The codename for the V710 is "Wheat Nas," and it belongs to the "Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)" generation, while the RX 9070 GRE is part of the "Navi IV (RX 9000)" generation. The V710 has no display outputs, a clear sign of a compute-oriented card, whereas the RX 9070 GRE includes 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a outputs for consumer use.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets reveal stark contrasts in nearly every major category. The most obvious difference is in memory: the PRO V710 has 28 GB, while the RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB. This is a 16 GB difference, which is enormous for tasks requiring large datasets. The bus width also differs, with the V710 using a 224-bit interface versus the RX 9070 GRE's 192-bit, leading to the V710's higher bandwidth of 504.0 GB/s against 432.0 GB/s. The shading unit count favors the V710 at 3456, while the RX 9070 GRE has 3072. The RX 9070 GRE has more ray tracing cores at 48, but the V710 has 54, a surprising edge for the professional card.

Clock speeds are a major point of divergence. The PRO V710 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The RX 9070 GRE has a lower base clock of 1420 MHz, but a much higher boost clock of 2790 MHz, and a defined game clock of 2220 MHz. This results in the RX 9070 GRE having a much higher FP32 compute throughput of 34.28 TFLOPS, compared to the V710's 27.65 TFLOPS. The RX 9070 GRE also has a higher pixel rate (267.8 GPixel/s vs 192.0 GPixel/s) and texture rate (535.7 GTexel/s vs 432.0 GTexel/s). Power consumption differs as well, with the V710 rated at 158 W TDP and the RX 9070 GRE at 220 W.

The physical and interface specifications also differ. The PRO V710 is a single-slot card that requires a single 8-pin power connector and a 450 W power supply. The RX 9070 GRE is a dual-slot card that needs two 8-pin connectors and a 550 W PSU. The bus interface is another key difference: the V710 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RX 9070 GRE uses the newer PCIe 5.0 x16. The release dates show the V710 launched on 2024-10-02, while the RX 9070 GRE came later on 2025-05-07. The RX 9070 GRE has a launch MSRP of 549 USD, while the V710 has no listed launch MSRP. Finally, the RX 9070 GRE has a display output configuration, while the V710 has none.

Where Each One Wins

The data suggests a clear division of labor. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins in the Geekbench OpenCL test, which is a strong indicator of performance in compute-heavy applications. Its 28 GB of memory and higher bandwidth make it suitable for workloads like large-scale data processing, scientific simulations, and machine learning inference, where memory capacity is often the bottleneck. The V710's lower TDP of 158 W and single-slot design also make it more suitable for dense server environments where space and power are at a premium. Its lack of display outputs reinforces its role as a dedicated compute accelerator rather than a traditional graphics card.

Conversely, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the clear winner for graphics-intensive tasks, as evidenced by its massive 5424 score in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. Its higher boost clock and pixel/texture rates make it the superior choice for gaming, real-time 3D rendering, and any application that relies on rasterization. The RX 9070 GRE's display outputs allow it to drive monitors directly, making it a consumer-friendly card. The RX 9070 GRE also has a higher FP32 throughput, which can benefit certain GPU-accelerated tasks, but its 12 GB memory limit could be a constraint for very large datasets. The RX 9070 GRE's higher TDP and dual-slot design are a trade-off for its performance.

The average benchmark scores show that the PRO V710 is slightly ahead overall, but this is misleading given the extreme variance in their specific test results. The V710's wins are in compute, while the RX 9070 GRE's are in graphics. For a user who needs both, the choice is not straightforward. The V710's 6.5% lead in OpenCL is relatively modest, while the RX 9070 GRE's 84.3% lead in Steel Nomad is monumental. This suggests that the RX 9070 GRE is the more versatile card for a general user, while the V710 is a specialist tool. The nearest rivals for each card reinforce this: the V710 is grouped with other prosumer and workstation cards, while the RX 9070 GRE sits alongside consumer gaming GPUs.

The Verdict

The verdict from the data is unambiguous: the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the card to choose for anyone whose primary workload involves 3D graphics, gaming, or real-time rendering. Its 5424 score in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, compared to the V710's 853, is a decisive factor that no amount of compute performance can overcome for these tasks. The RX 9070 GRE's higher boost clock, pixel rate, and texture rate all point to a graphics-first design. Its 12 GB of memory is sufficient for most consumer workloads, and its display outputs make it a complete package for a desktop PC.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710, on the other hand, is the appropriate pick for a specific professional niche. Its 6.5% advantage in the Geekbench OpenCL test, combined with its 28 GB memory capacity and higher bandwidth, makes it a better fit for compute-heavy tasks such as scientific research, AI model training, and video encoding. The V710's lack of display outputs is not a drawback in a server or render farm context, and its lower power draw and single-slot form factor are advantages in those environments. The data shows that while the RX 9070 GRE is the better all-rounder, the PRO V710 is the superior tool for pure compute workloads.

Ultimately, the benchmark results indicate that neither card is objectively "better" than the other; they are optimized for different purposes. The RX 9070 GRE's victory in the 3DMark test is so overwhelming that it is hard to recommend the V710 for any graphics-related task. Conversely, the V710's compute lead, while smaller, is backed by a memory capacity that the RX 9070 GRE cannot match. A user who values rendering speed should pick the RX 9070 GRE. A user who needs massive memory and compute density should pick the PRO V710. The choice is a matter of matching the hardware to the workload, and the data provides clear guidance on which card serves which role.