AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 Comparison

# The Verdict

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 and AMD Radeon Pro 560X occupy entirely different tiers of the graphics hardware spectrum, and the data reflects this clearly. The RTX 5090 D V2 is a current-generation flagship designed for maximum compute throughput, while the Radeon Pro 560X is an end-of-life mobile-class part aimed at basic professional workloads in portable systems.

Benchmark results place the RTX 5090 D V2 at an average score of 16,504 across its recorded tests, while the Radeon Pro 560X averages 15,082 across its three benchmark entries. However, these numbers come from different test suites, so direct comparison requires careful interpretation. The RTX 5090 D V2's single recorded benchmark is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scoring 16,504, while the Radeon Pro 560X's scores come from Geekbench Metal (18,763), Geekbench OpenCL (9,663), and Geekbench Vulkan (16,819).

For users requiring maximum rendering performance, the RTX 5090 D V2 is the clear choice. It delivers Blackwell 2.0 architecture, 5 nm process technology, and a 575 W power envelope that enables 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The Radeon Pro 560X, by contrast, offers 2.056 TFLOPS FP32 performance, making it suitable only for lightweight professional tasks.

The Radeon Pro 560X's advantage lies in its deployment context. As an integrated graphics processor with no dedicated power connectors and a 75 W TDP, it suits Apple Mac portable systems where space and thermal constraints dominate. Its end-of-life status means it remains relevant only for legacy compatibility.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs spans nearly a decade of development. The RTX 5090 D V2 uses the GB202 chip built on TSMC's 5 nm process, containing 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 122.9 million per square millimeter. The Radeon Pro 560X uses the Polaris 21 chip fabricated on GlobalFoundries' 14 nm process, packing 3,000 million transistors onto a 123 mm² die for a density of 24.4 million per square millimeter.

Memory configurations differ substantially. The RTX 5090 D V2 carries 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon Pro 560X offers 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus for 94.08 GB/s. This represents a bandwidth ratio of roughly 14 to 1 in favor of the NVIDIA part.

Compute resources show similar disparity. The RTX 5090 D V2 features 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, 176 render output units, 170 ray tracing cores, and 680 tensor cores. The Radeon Pro 560X provides 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with no ray tracing or tensor core equivalents listed.

Clock behavior also differs. The RTX 5090 D V2 operates with a base clock of 2,017 MHz and boost clock of 2,407 MHz, with memory running at 1,750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The Radeon Pro 560X has no recorded core clocks but its memory runs at 1,470 MHz (5.9 Gbps effective).

Architectural features show the NVIDIA part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The AMD part supports DirectX 12 (12_0), Vulkan 1.3, and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5090 D V2 uses PCIe 5.0 x16 while the Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No direct head-to-head benchmark results exist in the database between these two products. Each GPU was tested with different benchmark suites, making apples-to-apples comparison impossible from recorded measurements alone.

The RTX 5090 D V2's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,504 places it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA T400 (16,508, 0% difference), AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (16,415, 0.5% behind), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16,408, 0.6% behind), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361, 0.9% behind). This clustering suggests the RTX 5090 D V2 sits within a tight performance band at the top of the database's recorded results, despite its flagship positioning.

The Radeon Pro 560X shows more variance across its three benchmark entries. Its Geekbench Metal score of 18,763 substantially exceeds its OpenCL result of 9,663, indicating Metal optimization. The Vulkan score of 16,819 sits between these extremes. Its average of 15,082 places it at the 57th percentile overall. Nearest rivals include NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti (15,063, 0.1% behind), AMD Radeon RX 7600 (15,171, 0.6% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15,199, 0.8% ahead), and AMD Radeon 680M (15,270, 1.2% ahead).

The percentile positioning is notable: despite the massive architectural and specification differences, both GPUs rank within two percentile points of each other (59th versus 57th). This reflects the database's broad inclusion of professional and consumer parts across many generations, where the RTX 5090 D V2 competes against other modern high-end cards while the Radeon Pro 560X competes against a wider field of mid-range and older parts.

The recorded data shows the RTX 5090 D V2's single benchmark score of 16,504 exceeds the Radeon Pro 560X's OpenCL result of 9,663 by a significant margin, but falls below its Metal score of 18,763. This illustrates how API selection dramatically affects relative performance between these very different architectures.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 delivers 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Radeon Pro 560X provides 2.056 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA part offers approximately 50 times the FP32 throughput.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs support?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 has 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth. The Radeon Pro 560X has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus with 94.08 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are both GPUs currently available for purchase?

A: No. The RTX 5090 D V2 has active production status and was released in August 2025. The Radeon Pro 560X is end-of-life, having been released in July 2018.

Q: Which GPU supports ray tracing?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 includes 170 ray tracing cores and 680 tensor cores. The Radeon Pro 560X has no ray tracing or tensor cores listed in its specifications.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 has a 575 W TDP, uses one 16-pin power connector, and requires a 950 W suggested power supply. The Radeon Pro 560X has a 75 W TDP, requires no additional power connectors, and has no suggested PSU rating.

Q: How do their benchmark scores compare?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 scored 16,504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Radeon Pro 560X scored 18,763 in Geekbench Metal, 9,663 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 16,819 in Geekbench Vulkan. The database records no shared benchmark between them.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5090 D V2 wins decisively in scenarios demanding maximum compute throughput. Its 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 1.34 TB/s memory bandwidth, and 24 GB VRAM capacity support large-scale rendering, machine learning inference, and high-resolution texture workloads. The 170 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while 680 tensor cores accelerate AI-driven features. Its PCIe 5.0 x16 interface doubles the available bus bandwidth compared to the Radeon Pro 560X's PCIe 3.0 x8 connection. The 5 nm process node and Blackwell 2.0 architecture provide modern feature support including DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4.

The Radeon Pro 560X wins in deployment flexibility for compact systems. Its 75 W TDP requires no auxiliary power connectors, making it compatible with systems lacking high-wattage PSUs. As an integrated graphics processor, it fits into portable Mac devices where dedicated expansion slots are unavailable. Its 14 nm process and GCN 4.0 architecture provide broad legacy software compatibility, and its end-of-life status means it appears in established systems that may not require modern GPU features.

The benchmark data suggests the Radeon Pro 560X performs best in Metal-based applications in macOS environments, where its 18,763 Metal score indicates strong optimization for that API. Its Vulkan score of 16,819 also demonstrates respectable cross-platform performance. The RTX 5090 D V2's 16,504 Steel Nomad score represents modern DirectX 12 rendering capability that the older AMD part cannot match in equivalent workloads.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

Process and Die: The RTX 5090 D V2 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The Radeon Pro 560X uses a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries with 3,000 million transistors on a 123 mm² die.

Memory: The RTX 5090 D V2 has 24 GB GDDR7 with 384-bit bus and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth. The Radeon Pro 560X has 4 GB GDDR5 with 128-bit bus and 94.08 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute Units: The RTX 5090 D V2 has 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 170 ray tracing cores, and 680 tensor cores. The Radeon Pro 560X has 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with no ray tracing or tensor cores.

Performance Rates: The RTX 5090 D V2 achieves 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate, 1,636.8 GTexel/s texture rate, and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32/FP16. The Radeon Pro 560X achieves 16.06 GPixel/s pixel rate, 64.26 GTexel/s texture rate, and 2.056 TFLOPS FP32/FP16.

Power: The RTX 5090 D V2 has 575 W TDP, dual-slot form factor, 1x 16-pin power connector, 950 W suggested PSU, and 304 mm length. The Radeon Pro 560X has 75 W TDP, IGP form factor, no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and no recorded dimensions.

Connectivity: The RTX 5090 D V2 uses PCIe 5.0 x16 with 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 with portable device dependent outputs.

API Support: The RTX 5090 D V2 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Radeon Pro 560X supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.

Clocks: The RTX 5090 D V2 records base 2,017 MHz, boost 2,407 MHz, and memory 1,750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The Radeon Pro 560X has no core clock records but memory runs at 1,470 MHz (5.9 Gbps effective).

Production Status: The RTX 5090 D V2 is active with a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD. The Radeon Pro 560X is end-of-life with no recorded launch MSRP.