AMD Radeon 890M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER Comparison
AMD Radeon 890M
GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon 890M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER
Where Each One Wins
The recorded data splits this comparison into two very different use cases. The AMD Radeon 890M wins no benchmark comparisons in the head-to-head dataset. It is an integrated graphics processor designed for lightweight, portable systems, and its scores reflect that positioning. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER wins the single head-to-head benchmark recorded, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, by a substantial margin. That test measures modern DirectX 12 rendering workloads, and the discrete NVIDIA part dominates it.
The AMD Radeon 890M delivers a 45th percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 9210. Its closest rivals are the AMD Radeon Vega 8, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465, and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M. The delta percentages against these rivals are all within one percent, meaning the 890M sits in a performance tier with older midrange discrete graphics cards and newer integrated solutions. This tells a clear story: the 890M is a capable IGP that can handle lighter gaming and general graphics workloads, but it is not built for high-end rendering.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER, by contrast, sits at the 19th percentile in the same database. Its average benchmark score is 3075, which is lower than the 890M's average, but that average is based on only a single recorded test, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 workload. This is a newer, more demanding benchmark, and the RTX 5080 SUPER's closest rivals in the database, the NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Arc Pro B60, NVIDIA GeForce 820A, and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M, all have average scores in the 3000 range. The percentile ranking is therefore skewed by the specific test used, not by raw capability.
The practical split is clear: the 890M wins on portability and power efficiency for everyday tasks, while the RTX 5080 SUPER wins decisively on raw rendering performance in demanding DirectX 12 workloads. The 890M is an IGP with a 15 W TDP, meaning it requires no separate power connectors and fits into thin laptops. The RTX 5080 SUPER is a dual-slot, 415 W discrete card with a 16-pin power connector, designed for desktop systems with robust cooling and power delivery.
Architecture Differences
The architectural gap between these two parts is fundamental. The AMD Radeon 890M uses the Strix Point chip built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, produced on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 145.9 million per mm². This is a highly dense, power-efficient design aimed at mobile integration. The 890M belongs to the Navi III IGP generation, specifically the Strix Point Mobile family, and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER uses the GB203 chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, produced on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². This is a larger, more power-hungry chip designed for maximum throughput. It belongs to the GeForce 50 generation and uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, which doubles the available bandwidth compared to the 890M's x8 link.
Core counts differ massively. The 890M has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 raster operation units, and 16 ray tracing cores. It has no dedicated tensor cores. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, 112 raster operation units, 84 ray tracing cores, and 336 tensor cores. The NVIDIA part has roughly ten times the shading units, five times the TMUs, three and a half times the ROPs, and over five times the ray tracing cores. The tensor core count is a significant advantage for AI-accelerated workloads, which the 890M cannot match.
Memory architecture is another major divider. The 890M uses system shared memory, meaning its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all dependent on the host system. The database records its memory as "System Shared" for all fields, with bandwidth listed as "System Dependent." The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth. This dedicated high-speed memory is critical for modern games and compute tasks, while the 890M must share bandwidth with the CPU.
Clock speeds also differ. The 890M runs at a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The RTX 5080 SUPER runs at a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. The AMD part boosts higher, but with far fewer cores, while the NVIDIA part maintains a high base clock across many more cores. The pixel rate for the 890M is 92.80 GPixel/s, while the RTX 5080 SUPER achieves 293.1 GPixel/s. Texture rates are 185.6 GTexel/s versus 879.3 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 5.939 TFLOPS for the 890M and 56.28 TFLOPS for the RTX 5080 SUPER, a nearly tenfold difference.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The only head-to-head benchmark recorded in the database is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. In this test, the AMD Radeon 890M scores 590, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075. The delta percentage is -80.8, meaning the 890M trails by nearly 81 percent. This is a decisive victory for the NVIDIA part. The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers over five times the raw score in this modern DX12 workload.
This benchmark is particularly relevant because it stresses the GPU with geometry, ray tracing, and compute-heavy passes that reflect current-generation game engines. The 890M's 16 ray tracing cores and 1024 shading units are simply outmatched by the 84 ray tracing cores and 10,752 shading units of the RTX 5080 SUPER. The NVIDIA part also benefits from its 24 GB GDDR7 memory and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, whereas the 890M relies on system shared memory with bandwidth that varies by host platform.
The 890M does have other benchmark results in the database that show its relative strengths, but none of these are head-to-head comparisons against the RTX 5080 SUPER. In Geekbench OpenCL, the 890M scores 37,254, and in Geekbench Vulkan it scores 40,808. Passmark scores range from 33 in DirectX 10 to 97 in DirectX 9, with a G3D score of 8076 and a GPU compute score of 4157. These numbers indicate that the 890M performs best in lighter API workloads and general compute, but the Steel Nomad result is the only direct comparison available, and it is one-sided.
The average benchmark score for the 890M is 9210, which is higher than the RTX 5080 SUPER's 3075 average. This is because the 890M's average includes multiple tests across different APIs, many of which are less demanding than Steel Nomad. The RTX 5080 SUPER's average is based on a single test that is far more demanding. This disparity in average scores does not reflect real-world capability; it reflects the test mix. In the one test where both parts appear, the RTX 5080 SUPER wins by a wide margin.
The Verdict
The data indicates that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is the clear choice for any workload involving modern DirectX 12 rendering, especially at high resolutions or with ray tracing enabled. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075 versus the 890M's 590 shows a performance gap that cannot be bridged by any driver or system configuration. The RTX 5080 SUPER has the dedicated memory, the tensor cores, and the raw compute throughput to handle demanding games and compute tasks.
The AMD Radeon 890M is the appropriate choice for a thin-and-light laptop where power draw and heat are the primary constraints. Its 15 W TDP and IGP form factor mean it needs no power connectors and produces minimal heat, making it suitable for portable devices. Its benchmark results show it can handle older or less demanding games, and its 45th percentile ranking places it near the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960, a capable card for 1080p gaming at medium settings in its era. For everyday use, video playback, and light gaming, the 890M is sufficient.
The RTX 5080 SUPER, with its 415 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, and 16-pin power connector, is not a mobile part. It requires a desktop chassis with adequate airflow and a power supply capable of feeding it. Its 19th percentile ranking in the database is misleading because it is based on a single demanding test; the actual performance is far above the 890M in any GPU-bound scenario. The launch MSRP is 999 USD, which reflects its positioning as a high-end discrete card.
For a user building a desktop gaming or workstation PC, the RTX 5080 SUPER is the only sensible choice from this pair. For a user buying a laptop for general productivity and occasional light gaming, the 890M is the only option, as the RTX 5080 SUPER is not available in an integrated form. The data does not support any middle ground: the performance gap is too large for the 890M to be considered a substitute, and the power draw of the RTX 5080 SUPER makes it unsuitable for portable use.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU wins the head-to-head benchmark?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER wins the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test with a score of 3075, versus 590 for the AMD Radeon 890M, a delta of -80.8 percent for the AMD part.
Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?
A: The AMD Radeon 890M has an average benchmark score of 9210, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has an average score of 3075. The 890M's higher average is due to a broader test mix, not higher peak performance.
Q: How much memory does each GPU have?
A: The AMD Radeon 890M uses system shared memory, with size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all dependent on the host system. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth.
Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?
A: The AMD Radeon 890M has a TDP of 15 W and requires no power connectors, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has a TDP of 415 W and requires a single 16-pin power connector.
Q: Which GPU has more shading units?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has 10,752 shading units, compared to 1,024 for the AMD Radeon 890M. The RTX 5080 SUPER also has 336 texture units and 112 ROPs, versus 64 TMUs and 32 ROPs for the 890M.
Q: What are the closest rivals for each GPU in the database?
A: The AMD Radeon 890M's closest rivals are the AMD Radeon Vega 8, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465, and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M, all within one percent of its average score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER's closest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000, Intel Arc Pro B60, NVIDIA GeForce 820A, and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M.
Specification Differences
The AMD Radeon 890M uses the Strix Point chip on RDNA 3.5 architecture, produced on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER uses the GB203 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, produced on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Both are active production parts, but their physical designs differ sharply.
Transistor counts: the 890M has 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, while the RTX 5080 SUPER has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. Transistor density is 145.9M per mm² for the 890M and 120.6M per mm² for the RTX 5080 SUPER.
Clock speeds: the 890M has a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. Memory clocks are system dependent for the 890M, while the RTX 5080 SUPER runs at 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective speed.
Memory: the 890M uses system shared memory with no dedicated size, type, bus width, or bandwidth. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth.
Compute resources: the 890M has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 16 ray tracing cores, with no tensor cores. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10,752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 84 ray tracing cores, and 336 tensor cores.
Performance rates: the 890M achieves 92.80 GPixel/s pixel rate, 185.6 GTexel/s texture rate, and 5.939 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16. The RTX 5080 SUPER achieves 293.1 GPixel/s pixel rate, 879.3 GTexel/s texture rate, and 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16.
Power and form factor: the 890M is an IGP with 15 W TDP, no power connectors, and no slot width. The RTX 5080 SUPER is dual-slot, 415 W TDP, with a single 16-pin power connector, and measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.
Bus interface and outputs: the 890M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 with display outputs dependent on the portable device. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16 with 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.
Release dates: the 890M was released on 2024-07-14, while the RTX 5080 SUPER is dated 2025-12-31. The 890M's predecessor is the Navi II IGP. The RTX 5080 SUPER has no recorded predecessor in the database.