AMD Radeon 880M vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison
AMD Radeon 880M
Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon 880M vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data presents a direct comparison challenge: the AMD Radeon 880M has ten benchmark results in the database, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no benchmark results at all. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, so no direct score-by-score comparison is possible from the database. The Radeon 880M's average benchmark score is 8436, placing it in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs. The LX ULTRA has an average benchmark score of zero and sits in the 50th percentile, though this percentile figure is not supported by any individual test scores.
The Radeon 880M's individual results show a clear performance profile. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 535. Geekbench results are substantially higher: 31285 in OpenCL and 40006 in Vulkan. PassMark results vary widely by API generation, with DirectX 9 at 97, DirectX 11 at 73, DirectX 10 at 31, and DirectX 12 at 32. The PassMark G2D score is 969, the G3D score is 7615, and the GPU compute score is 3719.
Without any recorded benchmarks for the LX ULTRA, the database cannot compute deltas, win counts, or performance margins. The winsA and winsB counters are both zero, reflecting the absence of head-to-head data. The nearest rivals for the Radeon 880M provide context: it is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX, 0.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon HD 8870M, and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 M375X. These margins are narrow, indicating the 880M clusters closely with mobile GPUs from several generations ago.
Where Each One Wins
The Radeon 880M wins in every category where data exists, because the LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores. The 880M's PassMark G3D score of 7615 indicates a functional level of DirectX performance across multiple API versions, with DirectX 9 being the strongest legacy API result at 97. Its OpenCL and Vulkan scores in Geekbench, 31285 and 40006 respectively, show strong general-purpose compute and modern graphics API performance.
The LX ULTRA cannot be assigned any wins from the database. Its theoretical specifications suggest a different performance class, but benchmark results are required to confirm that. The FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s are far above the 880M's 4.454 TFLOPS and 139.2 GTexel/s, but these are specification-derived figures, not measured results. The database records no test where the LX ULTRA outperforms the 880M.
Use-case analysis therefore rests on the 880M alone. Its PassMark DirectX 11 score of 73 is its best legacy API result, followed by DirectX 9 at 97 and DirectX 10 at 31. The DirectX 12 score of 32 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score, which suggests the 880M is better suited to workloads that use older graphics APIs. The PassMark G2D score of 969 indicates 2D desktop workloads are handled adequately, while the GPU compute score of 3719 shows moderate compute capability.
FAQ
Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA have any benchmark scores in the database?
A: No. The LX ULTRA has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed.
Q: How does the AMD Radeon 880M compare to its closest rivals?
A: The 880M is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX, 0.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, 0.3% behind the AMD Radeon HD 8870M, and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 M375X.
Q: What is the 880M's best benchmark result?
A: The highest recorded score is 40006 in Geekbench Vulkan, followed by 31285 in Geekbench OpenCL.
Q: Which DirectX version shows the highest PassMark score for the 880M?
A: DirectX 9 has the highest PassMark score at 97, followed by DirectX 11 at 73.
Q: What is the 880M's percentile ranking?
A: The Radeon 880M is in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8436.
Q: What is the LX ULTRA's percentile ranking?
A: The LX ULTRA is listed in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, but it has no benchmark scores to support this ranking.
Specification Differences
The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The Radeon 880M uses a 4 nm process node, while the LX ULTRA uses 6 nm. The 880M has 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, with a transistor density of 145.9M / mm²; the LX ULTRA has unknown transistor count, die size, and density. Clock behavior differs fundamentally: the 880M has a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, while the LX ULTRA has no base or boost clock recorded. The 880M's memory is system shared, whereas the LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 880M's memory clock is system shared, while the LX ULTRA runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.
Computational resources diverge sharply. The 880M has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Ray tracing cores are present on the 880M at 12, while the LX ULTRA has none recorded. Pixel rate for the 880M is 46.40 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX ULTRA. Texture rates are 139.2 GTexel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s respectively. FP32 throughput is 4.454 TFLOPS for the 880M and 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX ULTRA. FP16 performance is 4.454 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio for the 880M, while the LX ULTRA delivers 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.
Power and physical specifications differ substantially. The 880M has a TDP of 15 W, an IGP slot width, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, a dual-slot width, a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for the 880M and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX ULTRA. Display outputs are portable device dependent for the 880M, while the LX ULTRA has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Dimensions for the 880M are not recorded; the LX ULTRA measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. Release dates are 2024-07-14 for the 880M and 2026-03-16 for the LX ULTRA. The 880M's predecessor is Navi II IGP; the LX ULTRA has no predecessor recorded.
Architecture Differences
The 880M is built on RDNA 3.5 architecture and belongs to the Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile) generation, using the Strix Point chip. The LX ULTRA uses a TrueGPU architecture on the 7G105 chip, belonging to the 7G100 generation. Both use TSMC as the foundry, but at different nodes: 4 nm for the 880M and 6 nm for the LX ULTRA. The 880M has 12 ray tracing cores; the LX ULTRA has none recorded. Neither GPU has tensor cores recorded.
API support differs in Vulkan version. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The 880M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. The 880M's FP16 ratio is 1:1, meaning FP16 throughput equals FP32 throughput. The LX ULTRA's FP16 ratio is 2:1, meaning its FP16 throughput is double its FP32 throughput, which indicates a different compute pipeline design despite both being classified as supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate.
The memory architecture reveals the fundamental design split. The 880M is an integrated graphics processor that shares system memory, with bandwidth described as system dependent. The LX ULTRA is a discrete dual-slot card with dedicated 24 GB GDDR6 memory and a fixed 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 880M's transistor density of 145.9M / mm² reflects its integrated nature and compact die. The LX ULTRA's transistor count is unknown, so density cannot be calculated.
The production status for both is Active. The 880M's predecessor is Navi II IGP, while the LX ULTRA has no predecessor. The 880M was released on 2024-07-14, and the LX ULTRA on 2026-03-16. The 880M's slot width of IGP and lack of power connectors align with its 15 W TDP, while the LX ULTRA's dual-slot width, 16-pin connector, and 550 W suggested PSU align with its 225 W TDP. The LX ULTRA's 268 mm length places it in the standard discrete graphics card form factor. The 880M's display outputs are portable device dependent, reflecting its mobile IGP positioning, whereas the LX ULTRA provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for desktop use.