AMD Radeon 880M vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 880M compare to the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 in terms of average benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M has an average benchmark score of 8436, placing it in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the AMD Radeon 880M based on average scores?

A: The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX (average score 8427, 0.1% behind the 880M), the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (average score 8458, 0.3% ahead), and the AMD Radeon HD 8870M (average score 8462, 0.3% ahead). The AMD Radeon R9 M375X trails by 1.3% with an average score of 8325.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No. The recorded data shows an empty benchmark array for the LX 7G100, meaning there are no 3DMark, Geekbench, or Passmark scores available for comparison. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M uses system shared memory with the bus width and bandwidth also listed as system shared and system dependent, respectively. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M has a TDP of 15 W, is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors, and requires no suggested PSU. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W, uses a dual-slot design with a single 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU supports newer API versions?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but it uses Vulkan 1.3 instead of 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design lineages. The AMD Radeon 880M is built on the Strix Point chip using the RDNA 3.5 architecture, part of the Navi III IGP generation. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 34,000 million transistors packed into a 233 mm² die. The transistor density works out to 145.9M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with a TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation. It is also made by TSMC, but on a 6 nm process; its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

The shading engine differs sharply. The 880M has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs. It also includes 12 ray tracing cores, a feature that is absent or not recorded for the LX 7G100. The LX 7G100 instead offers 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing core count listed. This gives the LX 7G100 a much larger raw compute footprint on paper.

Clock behavior diverges as well. The AMD part has a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, with memory speed tied to the system. The Lisuan Tech part lists no base or boost clock, but its memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate. The 880M has a pixel rate of 46.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s, while the LX 7G100 reaches 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s.

API support shows a small gap: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6, but the 880M reports Vulkan 1.4 versus Vulkan 1.3 for the LX 7G100. The bus interface also differs, with the 880M using PCIe 4.0 x8 and the LX 7G100 using PCIe 4.0 x16.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 880M wins in portability and integration. It is an IGP with a 15 W TDP, no power connectors, and dimensions that are not applicable since it lives on the processor die. This makes it suitable for thin, power-conscious mobile systems where dedicated graphics would not fit. Its display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, confirming its role in laptops and handhelds. The 880M also holds the API advantage with Vulkan 1.4 over the LX 7G100's 1.3.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins decisively in raw throughput and memory capacity. It offers 6144 shading units versus 768, a 192-bit memory bus with 12 GB of GDDR6 versus system shared memory, and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth versus a system dependent figure. Its FP32 compute is 24.58 TFLOPS compared to 4.454 TFLOPS for the 880M. The LX 7G100 also doubles FP16 performance to 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the 880M delivers 4.454 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, designed for a desktop tower with a 550 W suggested PSU.

In terms of benchmark presence, the 880M has a full set of scores across 3DMark, Geekbench, and Passmark tests. The LX 7G100 has none, giving the 880M the only measurable wins in the database. The recorded data shows 0 wins for the LX 7G100 and 0 wins for the 880M in head-to-head benchmarks, but the 880M at least has scores to analyze.

Specification Differences

The two parts diverge on nearly every specification field. The process node differs: 4 nm for the AMD Radeon 880M versus 6 nm for the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. Transistor count is 34,000 million for the 880M, while the LX 7G100 lists it as unknown. Die size is 233 mm² for the 880M and unknown for the LX 7G100. Transistor density is 145.9M per mm² for the 880M and null for the LX 7G100.

Clock speeds: the 880M has a 400 MHz base and 2900 MHz boost, while the LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock recorded. Memory speed: system shared for the 880M, 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for the LX 7G100. Memory size: system shared versus 12 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: system shared versus 192 bit. Bandwidth: system dependent versus 432.0 GB/s.

Core counts are starkly different: 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 12 RT cores for the 880M; 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no RT core listing for the LX 7G100. Pixel rate is 46.40 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 139.2 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 4.454 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 is 4.454 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP is 15 W versus 225 W. Slot width is IGP versus dual-slot. Power connectors are none versus one 8-pin. Suggested PSU is null versus 550 W. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are portable device dependent versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Dimensions: the 880M has none listed, while the LX 7G100 measures 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width. Release dates differ as well: 2024-07-14 for the 880M and 2026-06-17 for the LX 7G100.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Radeon 880M and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The wins counter shows 0 for both sides. However, the 880M has individual benchmark scores that define its performance envelope.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the 880M scores 535. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 31285. In Geekbench Vulkan, it reaches 40006. Passmark results are mixed across API versions: DirectX 10 scores 31, DirectX 11 scores 73, DirectX 12 scores 32, and DirectX 9 scores 97. Passmark G2D is 969, G3D is 7615, and GPU compute is 3719.

These scores place the 880M in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX, averages 8427, which is 0.1% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce MX330 averages 8458, 0.3% ahead. The AMD Radeon HD 8870M also averages 8462, 0.3% ahead. The AMD Radeon R9 M375X averages 8325, putting it 1.3% behind. This means the 880M sits in a tight cluster of older discrete mobile GPUs, with deltas of less than 1.5% in either direction.

The LX 7G100 has no benchmark scores to compare directly. Its percentile rank of 50 is noted in the database, but with an average score of 0, this rank does not correspond to any measured performance data. The only meaningful comparison available is the architectural specification gap: the LX 7G100 lists far higher pixel rate, texture rate, and FP32 throughput, but those numbers cannot be verified against actual benchmark results.

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon 880M is the only one of the two with measured performance data. Its average benchmark score of 8436, combined with the 43rd percentile rank, places it in the same class as the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX, the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, and the AMD Radeon HD 8870M, all within 0.3% of its average score. This makes it a capable integrated solution for light gaming and general GPU compute in a 15 W envelope. Its 768 shading units, 12 RT cores, and Vulkan 1.4 support give it modern feature coverage despite the modest core count.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 targets a completely different segment. Its 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 12 GB GDDR6, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth point to a high-throughput discrete card. The FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS is more than five times the 880M's 4.454 TFLOPS. The FP16 output of 49.15 TFLOPS suggests compute workloads that take advantage of packed math. The 225 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, and 550 W suggested PSU confirm this is a desktop-oriented part, not a mobile IGP.

The choice between them depends entirely on the use case. For a portable device, a laptop or handheld where the GPU must share power with the CPU and the system memory, the 880M is the only feasible option. It delivers a measurable, if modest, benchmark profile with no additional power connectors and a 15 W draw. For a desktop builder seeking maximum raw compute, the LX 7G100 offers the larger specifications, but the absence of benchmark data means its real-world performance cannot be confirmed from the database. The 880M has verified scores; the LX 7G100 has only paper specifications.

The recorded data shows the 880M as an active, shipping product with a known predecessor (Navi II IGP) and a 2024 release date. The LX 7G100 is also listed as active, with a 2026 release date, but it has no predecessor, no successor, and no benchmark history. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the 880M is a proven, low-power integrated GPU with a solid benchmark footprint, while the LX 7G100 is a high-speculation discrete card awaiting performance validation.