AMD Radeon 8065S vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct benchmark scores for either the AMD Radeon 8065S or the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. Both entries sit at the 50th percentile against all GPUs in the database, with average benchmark scores of zero. This means the head-to-head comparison must be derived from the architectural specifications and raw compute capabilities recorded in the database, rather than from empirical run-to-run measurements.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA holds the clear advantage in raw floating-point throughput. Its FP32 performance is recorded at 24.58 TFLOPS, which is 60% higher than the AMD Radeon 8065S's 15.36 TFLOPS. In FP16 workloads, the gap widens considerably: the LX ULTRA delivers 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), while the Radeon 8065S manages only 15.36 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). That puts the LX ULTRA at 3.2 times the FP16 throughput of the AMD part. For compute-heavy applications such as AI inference or scientific simulation that leverage FP16, the Lisuan Tech product delivers substantially more mathematical capability per clock.

However, the Radeon 8065S counters in texture throughput. Its texture rate is recorded at 480.0 GTexel/s, compared to 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX ULTRA. That gives the AMD part a 25% advantage in texture fill, which typically benefits traditional rasterized gaming workloads where texture sampling dominates. Both parts produce identical pixel rates at 192.0 GPixel/s, meaning the ROP throughput is matched exactly between the two designs.

Shader core counts also favor the Lisuan Tech part, with 6144 shading units versus 2560 for the AMD Radeon 8065S. That is a 2.4x difference in raw shader count. However, the Radeon 8065S compensates with a much higher boost clock of 3000 MHz, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded boost clock in the database. The AMD part's boost frequency is 1295 MHz at base, and the 3000 MHz boost suggests a significant clock ramp capability. Without a recorded clock for the LX ULTRA, the effective frequency advantage cannot be quantified, but the FP32 TFLOPS figure already accounts for whatever clock the Lisuan Tech part runs at.

The Radeon 8065S also includes 40 dedicated ray tracing cores, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded ray tracing core count. This gives AMD a feature advantage in ray-traced workloads, assuming the software can utilize them. The LX ULTRA's architecture, labeled "TrueGPU" in the database, does not list any RT core equivalency.

Memory configuration is a major differentiator. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD Radeon 8065S uses system shared memory, with bandwidth recorded as "System Dependent." This means the AMD part's memory performance is entirely contingent on the host system's memory configuration, while the LX ULTRA has a fixed, dedicated memory subsystem. For GPU-bound tasks that require repeated memory access, the LX ULTRA's dedicated 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is a concrete, measurable advantage over a shared-memory design whose bandwidth cannot be guaranteed.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA records 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, which is 60% higher than the AMD Radeon 8065S's 15.36 TFLOPS. The LX ULTRA also holds a 3.2x advantage in FP16 throughput (49.15 TFLOPS vs 15.36 TFLOPS).

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 8065S have any performance advantage?

A: Yes. The Radeon 8065S records a texture rate of 480.0 GTexel/s, 25% higher than the LX ULTRA's 384.0 GTexel/s. Both GPUs match at 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate. The AMD part also has a boost clock of 3000 MHz, while the LX ULTRA has no recorded boost clock.

Q: How do the memory subsystems compare?

A: The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon 8065S uses system shared memory, with size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all marked as "System Shared" or "System Dependent." The LX ULTRA's dedicated memory provides fixed bandwidth, while the AMD part's performance depends on the host system.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The Radeon 8065S has a TDP of 55 W and is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors. The LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, uses a dual-slot design, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and needs a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same API feature levels?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Radeon 8065S supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. The Radeon 8065S also includes 40 ray tracing cores, which the LX ULTRA does not list.

Q: Which GPU is physically larger?

A: The LX ULTRA is a dual-slot card measuring 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Radeon 8065S is an IGP with no recorded dimensions, meaning it is integrated into a host system rather than installed as a discrete card.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon 8065S uses the Gorgon Halo chip built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The die size is recorded at 308 mm², with transistor count listed as unknown. It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation and is classified as an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile, indicating a product lineage within AMD's mobile GPU lineup.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip built on an architecture labeled "TrueGPU," fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Die size and transistor count are both listed as unknown. It belongs to the 7G100 generation and is a discrete dual-slot card with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. There is no predecessor recorded.

Process node differences are significant: 4 nm for AMD versus 6 nm for Lisuan Tech. The smaller process node typically allows for higher transistor density and better power efficiency at equivalent clock speeds, though the database does not record density figures for either part.

The Radeon 8065S integrates 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It also carries 40 ray tracing cores. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but no ray tracing cores recorded. The shader core count advantage favors Lisuan Tech by 2.4x, while AMD's part compensates with a higher boost clock.

Memory architecture is where the designs diverge most sharply. The Radeon 8065S relies entirely on system shared memory, a hallmark of integrated GPUs. This means no dedicated VRAM, no fixed memory bus, and bandwidth that varies with the host platform's memory configuration. The LX ULTRA instead uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with a fixed 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. This dedicated memory subsystem is typical of discrete graphics cards and provides predictable performance for memory-intensive workloads.

Power delivery also reflects their different form factors. The Radeon 8065S draws a modest 55 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and fits as an IGP. The LX ULTRA draws 225 W, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply. The 170 W TDP difference directly correlates with the LX ULTRA's higher compute throughput and dedicated memory.

Display outputs differ as well. The Radeon 8065S has outputs listed as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning they are determined by the host laptop or device. The LX ULTRA provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, a standard configuration for discrete desktop cards.

API support is largely similar, with both recording DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. Vulkan support differs slightly: version 1.4 for AMD versus 1.3 for Lisuan Tech. The Radeon 8065S's ray tracing cores give it a hardware feature that the LX ULTRA does not list, which could matter for games and applications that use DirectX Raytracing or Vulkan ray tracing extensions.

Release dates in the database show the Radeon 8065S appearing on 2025-12-31, while the LX ULTRA appears on 2026-03-16. Both are marked as Active in production status.

The Verdict

The data indicates two GPUs aimed at different usage profiles. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is the compute-oriented part. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 performance, combined with 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory at 432.0 GB/s, make it the stronger choice for workloads that stress raw shader throughput and memory bandwidth. The 6144 shading units and 192 TMUs support this positioning. The 225 W TDP and dual-slot form factor confirm it is designed for a desktop system with a dedicated power supply.

The AMD Radeon 8065S is the efficiency-oriented integrated solution. Its 55 W TDP, IGP form factor, and no power connectors make it suitable for portable devices where power draw and physical space are constrained. The 3000 MHz boost clock and 480.0 GTexel/s texture rate give it a texture throughput advantage, and the 40 ray tracing cores add hardware support for ray-traced effects. The system shared memory approach ties its performance to the host platform, which is a limitation for memory-intensive tasks but also eliminates the need for dedicated VRAM.

For users who need maximum FP32 or FP16 compute, the LX ULTRA is the clear choice based on the recorded figures. For users who need ray tracing support, lower power draw, and an integrated form factor, the Radeon 8065S holds the advantage. The identical pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s means both parts can drive the same display resolution and refresh rate at the ROP level, though the LX ULTRA's higher shader count and memory bandwidth will likely sustain higher frame rates in shader-heavy scenes.

The database records no benchmark scores for either GPU, so real-world performance cannot be confirmed from the measurements available. The specification comparison, however, shows a clear division: the LX ULTRA is a high-power discrete card built for compute density, while the Radeon 8065S is a low-power integrated GPU built for mobility with selective feature advantages in texture rate and ray tracing.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 8065S | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Gorgon Halo | 7G105 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Die Size | 308 mm² | unknown |

| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | not recorded |

| Boost Clock | 3000 MHz | not recorded |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 160 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | not recorded |

| Pixel Rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 480.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 15.36 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 15.36 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | not recorded | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | not recorded | 268 mm 10.6 inches |

| Height | not recorded | 112 mm 4.4 inches |

| Width | not recorded | 40 mm 1.6 inches |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2026-03-16 |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | not recorded |

Both GPUs share the same DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6 support, and both are marked as Active in production status. The Radeon 8065S uses PCIe 5.0 x16 while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16, a difference that affects host interface bandwidth but not on-card compute performance. The Radeon 8065S has no recorded launch MSRP, and the LX ULTRA also has no recorded launch MSRP, so no pricing information is available in the database.