AMD Radeon 8065S vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Radeon 8065S versus the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. Both entries show zero wins in direct comparison, and neither has an average benchmark score or a percentile ranking above the median. The percentileVsAllGpus field for both is 50, placing each in the middle of the distribution of all GPUs tracked in the database, though this is a static placement rather than a derived score.

Without measured performance data, the comparison must rely on architectural specifications and theoretical throughput figures. The FP32 compute figures are the most direct apples-to-apples metric available. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the AMD Radeon 8065S delivers 15.36 TFLOPS. That difference represents a 60% advantage for the LX 7G100 in raw single-precision floating-point throughput. The gap is even more pronounced in FP16 workloads: the LX 7G100 reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the Radeon 8065S achieves 15.36 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The Lisuan part therefore offers over three times the half-precision throughput.

Pixel rates are identical at 192.0 GPixel/s for both GPUs, indicating that rasterization output stages are matched despite the LX 7G100 having 96 ROPs compared to 64 on the Radeon. Texture rate favors the AMD part, however: 480.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s for the Lisuan, a 25% advantage despite the latter having more TMUs (192 versus 160). This suggests clock speed differences compensate for the TMU count disparity.

Memory bandwidth heavily favors the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. It uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon 8065S uses system shared memory with bandwidth described as "System Dependent," meaning its effective throughput is contingent on the host platform's memory configuration. In a best-case scenario with fast system memory, the Radeon could approach competitive bandwidth, but it cannot match the dedicated GDDR6 implementation on the Lisuan card.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon 8065S uses RDNA 3.5, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with the chip codenamed "Gorgon Halo." It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses an architecture called "TrueGPU" on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, with the chip designated "7G106" within the 7G100 generation. The process node difference is significant: 4 nm versus 6 nm, giving the AMD part a density advantage, reflected in its 308 mm² die size versus an unknown die size for the Lisuan chip.

Shading unit counts differ substantially. The Radeon 8065S has 2560 shading units, while the LX 7G100 has 6144, more than double. The Radeon compensates with a higher boost clock of 3000 MHz (base 1295 MHz), while the Lisuan part has no listed base or boost clock in the database, only a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This clock data gap makes direct frequency comparison impossible, but the FP32 figures already account for both core count and clock speed.

Ray tracing support differs as well. The Radeon 8065S includes 40 dedicated RT cores, whereas the LX 7G100 lists no RT core count. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, so API-level feature parity exists, but the hardware implementation for ray tracing is only explicit on the AMD side. Vulkan support also differs: the Radeon supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan supports Vulkan 1.3.

Power characteristics are starkly different. The Radeon 8065S has a 55 W TDP, is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors, and requires no additional power beyond the motherboard. The LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, occupies a dual-slot form factor, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and needs a 550 W suggested power supply. This positions the Radeon as a mobile or embedded part, while the Lisuan is a discrete desktop card.

The Verdict

The data shows two GPUs targeting entirely different deployment scenarios. The AMD Radeon 8065S is an integrated solution with a 55 W TDP, designed for portable devices where power draw and space are constrained. Its system shared memory architecture ties performance to the host platform's RAM, making it a flexible but variable performer. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a discrete, dual-slot card with dedicated 12 GB GDDR6 memory, a 225 W TDP, and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, clearly built for desktop systems with room for expansion.

For raw compute workloads, the LX 7G100 is the stronger part by a wide margin: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 15.36 TFLOPS, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 versus 15.36 TFLOPS. Its 432.0 GB/s of dedicated memory bandwidth eliminates the memory bottleneck that the Radeon's system shared configuration introduces. The Radeon counters with higher texture throughput (480.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s), equal pixel throughput, and a newer process node (4 nm versus 6 nm) that suggests better power efficiency per transistor.

The Radeon 8065S carries a release date of 2025-12-31, while the Lisuan part is dated 2026-06-17, making the LX 7G100 roughly six months newer in the database. The Radeon lists a predecessor (Polaris Mobile), while the Lisuan has no prior generation listed. Neither part has a launch MSRP in the database, so no pricing comparison can be made.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field recorded in the database. The AMD Radeon 8065S uses a 4 nm process; the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses 6 nm. The Radeon has a known die size of 308 mm²; the Lisuan's die size is unknown. The Radeon's base clock is 1295 MHz with a boost of 3000 MHz; the Lisuan has no base or boost clock listed. The Radeon's memory is system shared in size, type, bus width, and bandwidth; the Lisuan has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Shading units: 2560 on the Radeon versus 6144 on the Lisuan. TMUs: 160 versus 192. ROPs: 64 versus 96. RT cores: 40 on the Radeon, none listed on the Lisuan. FP32: 15.36 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16: 15.36 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1). Pixel rate is identical at 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 480.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. TDP: 55 W versus 225 W. Slot width: IGP versus dual-slot. Power connectors: none versus one 8-pin. Suggested PSU: none listed versus 550 W. Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs: portable device dependent versus four DisplayPort 1.4a. Vulkan: 1.4 versus 1.3. Release date: 2025-12-31 versus 2026-06-17. Dimensions: none listed for the Radeon; the Lisuan measures 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the AMD Radeon 8065S delivers 15.36 TFLOPS. The Lisuan part is approximately 60% ahead in raw single-precision throughput.

Q: How do the memory configurations compare?

A: The Radeon 8065S uses system shared memory with bandwidth dependent on the host platform. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, more than double the 2560 on the AMD Radeon 8065S.

Q: Do both GPUs support ray tracing?

A: The Radeon 8065S explicitly lists 40 RT cores. The LX 7G100 lists no RT core count, though both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: What are the power requirements for each?

A: The Radeon 8065S has a 55 W TDP, is an IGP with no power connectors, and needs no suggested PSU. The LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, uses one 8-pin power connector, and requires a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: Which GPU has a smaller process node?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S uses a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Radeon also has a known die size of 308 mm², while the Lisuan's die size is unknown.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 8065S wins in scenarios where power efficiency and integration matter. Its 55 W TDP makes it suitable for portable devices, and its IGP form factor with no power connectors means it requires no additional power delivery hardware. The 4 nm process node and 308 mm² die size indicate a modern, dense design. Its texture rate of 480.0 GTexel/s exceeds the Lisuan's 384.0 GTexel/s, so texture-heavy workloads at matched pixel rates could favor the Radeon. The PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface provides twice the bandwidth of the Lisuan's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which could benefit data transfer in system shared memory configurations. Its Vulkan 1.4 support is also a newer API version than the Lisuan's 1.3.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in raw compute and memory bandwidth scenarios. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 outputs are substantially higher than the Radeon's figures. The 432.0 GB/s dedicated memory bandwidth is a fixed resource, not dependent on external factors like the Radeon's system shared memory. The 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer provides ample capacity for large datasets or high-resolution textures. The dual-slot design with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs supports multi-monitor desktop setups. Its 96 ROPs match the Radeon's pixel rate while having more shading units and TMUs, suggesting headroom in geometry and pixel processing that is not expressed in the equal pixel rate figure. The 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU indicate a part designed for sustained high-load operation in a desktop chassis.

The database currently lacks direct benchmark scores for either GPU, so these conclusions rest on specification analysis alone. The equal percentile placement (50th for both) offers no differentiation. Future benchmark data would clarify whether the Radeon's higher texture rate and newer process node translate to real-world wins in specific applications, or whether the Lisuan's compute and memory advantages dominate across the board.