AMD Radeon 8065S vs Intel Arc Pro B60 Comparison
AMD Radeon 8065S
Arc Pro B60
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon 8065S vs Intel Arc Pro B60
FAQ
Q: What are the core specifications of the AMD Radeon 8065S and Intel Arc Pro B60?
A: The AMD Radeon 8065S uses the Gorgon Halo chip on RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 40 RT cores. The Intel Arc Pro B60 uses the BMG-G21 chip on Xe2-HPG architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 RT cores.
Q: How do the memory configurations differ between these two GPUs?
A: The AMD Radeon 8065S uses System Shared memory, meaning its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all dependent on the host system. The Intel Arc Pro B60 has 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth.
Q: What are the power requirements for each card?
A: The AMD Radeon 8065S has a TDP of 55 W and is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors required. The Intel Arc Pro B60 has a TDP of 200 W, uses a dual-slot design, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W.
Q: What is the release timeline for these products?
A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 was released on September 4, 2025, with a launch MSRP of 499 USD. The AMD Radeon 8065S was released on December 31, 2025.
Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock and what is the difference?
A: The AMD Radeon 8065S has a boost clock of 3000 MHz, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 has a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The AMD part also has a lower base clock at 1295 MHz compared to the Intel's 2000 MHz base clock.
Q: What display outputs does each GPU provide?
A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The AMD Radeon 8065S has display outputs that are described as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning they vary based on the specific device it is integrated into.
The Verdict
The data presents two fundamentally different products. The AMD Radeon 8065S is an integrated GPU with a 55 W TDP, designed for portable devices, and it relies entirely on system memory. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is a discrete dual-slot card with 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, a 200 W TDP, and a launch MSRP of 499 USD.
Benchmark data is only recorded for the Intel Arc Pro B60. Its average benchmark score is 3182, placing it in the 20th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 scores 3163 (0.6% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 scores 3210 (0.9% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce 920M scores 3287 (3.2% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075 (3.5% lower). This indicates the Arc Pro B60 sits in a narrow performance band where small percentage differences separate competitors.
For the AMD Radeon 8065S, the database contains no benchmark scores and no nearest rivals, so direct quantitative comparison is impossible. The choice between these two comes down to form factor and system integration: the 8065S belongs in a portable device with shared memory, while the Arc Pro B60 is a standalone card for systems that can support its power and physical requirements.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
Direct head-to-head benchmark data between these two GPUs is absent from the database. For the Intel Arc Pro B60, individual measurements are available across several tests. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2646. PassMark results show a G3D score of 14580 and a GPU compute score of 7029. Legacy DirectX tests show scores of 179 for DirectX 9, 122 for DirectX 11, 76 for DirectX 12, and 61 for DirectX 10. The G2D score is 763.
The Intel Arc Pro B60's FP32 compute is rated at 12.29 TFLOPS, while its FP16 rating is 24.58 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The AMD Radeon 8065S delivers 15.36 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. In raw FP32 throughput, the AMD part holds a 25% lead based on these figures.
Pixel rates are identical: both GPUs deliver 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rates differ, with the Radeon 8065S at 480.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s for the Arc Pro B60, a 25% advantage for AMD. The Radeon also has twice the RT core count (40 versus 20) and a higher boost clock (3000 MHz versus 2400 MHz).
Specification Differences
The AMD Radeon 8065S uses the Gorgon Halo chip on a 4 nm process, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 uses the BMG-G21 chip on a 5 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC. The Intel part has a known transistor count of 19,600 million and a die size of 272 mm², with a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The AMD part has a die size of 308 mm² with unknown transistor count and density.
Clock speeds differ substantially. The Radeon 8065S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost of 3000 MHz. The Arc Pro B60 has a base of 2000 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz, with memory clocked at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective).
Memory is the largest differentiator. The AMD part uses System Shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The Intel part has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth.
Compute resources show partial overlap: both have 2560 shading units and 160 TMUs, but ROPs differ (64 for AMD, 80 for Intel), and RT cores differ (40 for AMD, 20 for Intel). The FP32 output is 15.36 TFLOPS for AMD versus 12.29 TFLOPS for Intel, while FP16 is 15.36 TFLOPS for AMD versus 24.58 TFLOPS for Intel.
Power and physical specifications are far apart. The AMD part is an IGP with 55 W TDP, no power connectors, and no dimensions listed. The Intel part is dual-slot, 167 mm long, 69 mm high, 40 mm wide, with a 200 W TDP, one 8-pin connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU.
Bus interfaces differ: PCIe 5.0 x16 for AMD versus PCIe 5.0 x8 for Intel. Display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent" for AMD versus 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 for Intel. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Radeon 8065S is built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, part of the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation, using the Gorgon Halo chip. Its predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile. The Intel Arc Pro B60 uses Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation, using the BMG-G21 chip, with no predecessor listed.
Process technology differs: the AMD chip uses a 4 nm node versus 5 nm for Intel. Both come from TSMC foundries. The AMD die is larger at 308 mm² compared to 272 mm² for Intel, though Intel documents its transistor count at 19,600 million while AMD's is unknown.
The memory architecture is a fundamental split. The Radeon 8065S relies on System Shared memory, making its effective bandwidth and capacity dependent on the host platform. The Arc Pro B60 has dedicated GDDR6 memory with a fixed 456.0 GB/s bandwidth and 24 GB capacity.
Compute architecture shows different FP16 handling. AMD provides 15.36 TFLOPS for both FP16 and FP32 with a 1:1 ratio, indicating no rate change between these precisions. Intel provides 24.58 TFLOPS for FP16 versus 12.29 TFLOPS for FP32, a 2:1 ratio that doubles FP16 throughput relative to FP32.
RT core counts differ significantly: 40 for AMD versus 20 for Intel. The ROP count is higher on Intel (80 versus 64), while TMU counts are identical at 160. The AMD boost clock reaches 3000 MHz versus 2400 MHz for Intel, a 25% clock advantage.
The AMD part is designed as an integrated solution with no power connectors and a 55 W TDP, fitting into portable devices. The Intel part is a discrete card with a dual-slot cooler, a single 8-pin connector, and a 200 W TDP, suited for desktop workstations with a 550 W suggested PSU.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Radeon 8065S wins on raw FP32 compute with 15.36 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS, a 25% advantage. It also leads in texture rate at 480.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, another 25% margin. Its boost clock is 3000 MHz versus 2400 MHz, and it carries double the RT cores (40 versus 20). Pixel rate is tied at 192.0 GPixel/s. For systems where integrated graphics are mandatory, such as portable devices, the 8065S is the only option in this comparison, and its 55 W TDP makes it suitable for power-constrained environments.
The Intel Arc Pro B60 wins on dedicated memory capacity and bandwidth. Its 24 GB of GDDR6 with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth is a decisive advantage over the AMD part's System Shared memory, which has no fixed capacity or bandwidth. The Intel card also has more ROPs (80 versus 64), a higher FP16 throughput at 24.58 TFLOPS versus 15.36 TFLOPS, and a higher base clock at 2000 MHz versus 1295 MHz. It provides four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs versus the AMD part's device-dependent outputs. The Arc Pro B60 also has a documented physical footprint at 167 mm by 69 mm by 40 mm, making its installation requirements clear.
The recorded benchmark data belongs exclusively to the Intel Arc Pro B60. Its PassMark G3D score of 14580 and GPU compute score of 7029, along with its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2646, provide measurable performance reference points. The AMD Radeon 8065S has no benchmark scores in the database, so its real-world performance cannot be compared numerically. The Intel part's average benchmark score of 3182 places it at the 20th percentile, with nearest rivals within a 3.5% band, indicating it competes in a specific performance tier rather than a broad range.