AMD Radeon 8060S vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE and the AMD Radeon 8060S represent two fundamentally different approaches to graphics hardware, yet the benchmark database places them in the same performance percentile. The RX 9070 GRE, a discrete desktop card from the Radeon RX 9000 series, and the 8060S, an integrated graphics processor from the Navi Mobile lineup, both achieve an 87th percentile ranking among all GPUs. However, their average benchmark scores tell a more nuanced story, with the RX 9070 GRE averaging 57,367 points against the 8060S’s 55,757. The desktop part leads in every head-to-head test, but the margin varies dramatically by workload.

FAQ

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in raw 3DMark performance?

A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RX 9070 GRE scores 5,424 points versus 2,162 for the 8060S. This represents a 150.9% advantage for the desktop card, indicating it is more than two and a half times faster in this particular DirectX 12 workload.

Q: Which GPU is better for compute-heavy applications?

A: The RX 9070 GRE also wins in compute, posting a Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,309 compared to 84,626 for the 8060S. The delta is 29.2%, a substantial but far narrower margin than the gaming test.

Q: Are these GPUs considered equivalent in the overall database?

A: Despite the performance gap, both GPUs share an identical 87th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The RX 9070 GRE’s nearest rivals include the Intel Arc A580 and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, while the 8060S sits near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 and AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RX 9070 GRE has a TDP of 220 W and requires a 550 W power supply with two 8-pin connectors. The 8060S has a drastically lower TDP of 55 W, uses no power connectors, and is classified as an integrated graphics processor (IGP).

Q: Are both GPUs based on the same architecture?

A: No. The RX 9070 GRE uses the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 48 chip, while the 8060S uses the older RDNA 3.5 architecture with the Strix Halo chip. Both are fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same API feature set?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning they are feature-compatible at the API level despite their architectural differences.

Architecture Differences

The RX 9070 GRE is built on RDNA 4.0, the latest graphics architecture from AMD, while the 8060S relies on the previous-generation RDNA 3.5. This generational gap manifests in several structural ways. The desktop card uses the Navi 48 chip, a dedicated discrete GPU die measuring 357 mm², while the 8060S uses the Strix Halo chip, which is smaller at 308 mm². The RX 9070 GRE packs 53,900 million transistors, whereas the 8060S’s transistor count is listed as unknown.

The compute resource allocation differs significantly. The RX 9070 GRE fields 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 raster operation units, and 48 ray tracing cores. The 8060S scales down to 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 40 ray tracing cores. These reductions directly impact throughput, as the desktop card achieves 34.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance versus 14.85 TFLOPS for the integrated part.

Memory architecture is where the two diverge most sharply. The RX 9070 GRE has dedicated 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 8060S has no dedicated memory at all; it uses System Shared memory, with the bus width, capacity, and bandwidth all listed as system-dependent. This means the integrated GPU’s performance scales with the host system’s memory configuration, creating inherent variability.

Clock speeds show an interesting inversion. The RX 9070 GRE has a higher base clock at 1420 MHz but a lower boost clock at 2790 MHz. The 8060S starts lower at 1295 MHz base but boosts higher to 2900 MHz. The desktop card also specifies a game clock of 2220 MHz, a metric the integrated part does not provide. Memory clocks differ as well, with the RX 9070 GRE running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) while the 8060S relies on whatever system memory is available.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two benchmark results paint a clear picture of where each GPU excels. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RX 9070 GRE delivers a dominant 5,424-point score, crushing the 8060S’s 2,162. The 150.9% delta means the desktop card achieves roughly 2.5 times the performance of the integrated solution. This test likely stresses raw rasterization and geometry throughput, areas where the RX 9070 GRE’s 96 ROPs and 192 TMUs provide massive advantages over the 8060S’s 64 ROPs and 160 TMUs.

The Geekbench OpenCL test tells a different story, though the winner remains the same. The RX 9070 GRE scores 109,309 against the 8060S’s 84,626, a 29.2% margin. This compute-focused benchmark narrows the gap considerably, suggesting that the 8060S’s architecture handles general-purpose workloads more efficiently relative to its gaming performance. The integrated part’s 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, while lower than the desktop card’s 34.28 TFLOPS, still delivers respectable compute results.

Notably, the 8060S has an additional benchmark entry not present for the RX 9070 GRE: a Geekbench Vulkan score of 80,483. This test is absent from the desktop card’s data set, so no direct comparison is possible. However, it confirms that the 8060S supports Vulkan 1.4 and can execute modern graphics APIs effectively.

The RX 9070 GRE wins both head-to-head tests, giving it a 2-0 record. The average benchmark scores reflect this, though the overall numbers are closer than the gaming test suggests. The desktop card’s 57,367 average sits just 2.9% above the 8060S’s 55,757, a surprisingly small gap given the massive 3DMark delta. This implies that the database’s average score calculation weights compute performance heavily, where the two GPUs are more evenly matched.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets reveal numerous divergences between these two products. The RX 9070 GRE belongs to the Radeon RX 9000 series, while the 8060S has no series designation. The desktop card uses the Navi 48 chip with RDNA 4.0 architecture, while the 8060S uses Strix Halo with RDNA 3.5. Their generations differ: Navi IV (RX 9000) versus Navi Mobile (RX 8000M).

Die size and transistor density differ markedly. The RX 9070 GRE measures 357 mm² with a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The 8060S is smaller at 308 mm², but its transistor count and density are unknown, making a direct comparison impossible.

Clock behavior differs in both base and boost frequencies. The RX 9070 GRE runs at 1420 MHz base and 2790 MHz boost, with a game clock of 2220 MHz. The 8060S runs at 1295 MHz base and 2900 MHz boost, with no game clock specified. The desktop card’s memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), while the 8060S uses system-shared memory.

Memory configuration is the most consequential difference. The RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 8060S has no dedicated memory, listing size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all as system-dependent. This means the desktop card has guaranteed memory performance, while the integrated GPU’s memory throughput varies by platform.

The compute units scale down significantly. The RX 9070 GRE has 3,072 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 48 RT cores. The 8060S has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 40 RT cores. These translate to 267.8 GPixel/s and 535.7 GTexel/s for the desktop card versus 185.6 GPixel/s and 464.0 GTexel/s for the integrated part.

Power and physical characteristics differ drastically. The RX 9070 GRE has a 220 W TDP, is dual-slot, requires two 8-pin power connectors, and suggests a 550 W PSU. The 8060S has a 55 W TDP, is an IGP, requires no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU. Both use PCIe 5.0 x16 interfaces, but the RX 9070 GRE outputs 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a, while the 8060S’s outputs are listed as portable-device dependent.

The RX 9070 GRE launched on May 7, 2025, with a launch MSRP of 549 USD. The 8060S launched earlier on January 5, 2025, with no launch MSRP specified. The desktop card’s predecessor is Navi III, while the 8060S follows Polaris Mobile. Both remain in active production.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 9070 GRE wins decisively in gaming and high-throughput workloads. Its 150.9% advantage in 3DMark Steel Nomad demonstrates overwhelming superiority in DirectX 12 rasterization. The 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures consistent performance without dependence on system memory speed or capacity. For users running modern games at high resolutions or detail settings, the desktop card’s 96 ROPs and 192 TMUs provide the pixel-pushing power needed for smooth frame rates. The 34.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance also makes it suitable for compute-heavy tasks like rendering or simulation, where its 29.2% lead in OpenCL provides meaningful gains.

The 8060S wins in efficiency and integration. Its 55 W TDP is exactly one-quarter of the RX 9070 GRE’s 220 W, making it ideal for laptops and compact systems where power and thermals are constrained. As an IGP with no power connectors, it requires no additional cabling and simplifies system building. The shared memory architecture means the GPU can access large system memory pools, which may benefit certain workloads that require more capacity than 12 GB. Its higher boost clock of 2900 MHz also suggests good single-threaded throughput when memory bandwidth is sufficient.

The database’s percentile rankings suggest both GPUs occupy similar performance tiers overall, despite the RX 9070 GRE’s benchmark wins. The 8060S’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, while the RX 9070 GRE sits near the Intel Arc A580 and RX 6950 XT. This indicates the integrated part’s efficiency-focused design achieves competitive average scores through strong compute performance, even if it cannot match the desktop card in gaming. The 8060S also supports Geekbench Vulkan testing, demonstrating API flexibility that may appeal to developers targeting cross-platform graphics.