AMD Radeon 8060S vs AMD Radeon PRO V710 Comparison

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 and AMD Radeon 8060S are two very different interpretations of AMD graphics, separated by architecture, power envelope, and intended deployment. The data reveals a stark split: the PRO V710 is a compute-oriented monster, while the 8060S is a highly efficient integrated solution. This analysis breaks down their benchmark results, architectural differences, and what each one is best suited for.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results present a clear division of labor. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the AMD Radeon 8060S delivers a decisive victory with a score of 2162, leaving the AMD Radeon PRO V710's 853 points in the dust. This represents a massive performance gap where the 8060S is 60.5% ahead, a delta that speaks to the 8060S's superior raw rasterization throughput in this specific workload. The 8060S's high boost clock and dedicated graphics pipeline clearly favor this modern gaming-centric benchmark.

However, the tables turn dramatically in the Geekbench OpenCL compute test. Here, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 asserts its dominance with a score of 116460, compared to the 8060S's 84626. This is a 37.6% advantage for the PRO V710, showcasing its strength in general-purpose compute tasks. This result is a direct reflection of its architecture and design philosophy: it is built to process massive amounts of data in parallel, far exceeding the capabilities of the integrated 8060S in this arena. The PRO V710's superior shading unit count and memory bandwidth are the primary drivers of this win.

The scoreboard is even at one win apiece, but the nature of these wins is telling. The 8060S wins by a massive margin in a synthetic gaming test, while the PRO V710 wins by a significant margin in a compute test. The average benchmark scores reinforce this split. The PRO V710 has an average score of 58657, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P102-100 (0.2% faster) and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (0.5% faster), showing it sits in a highly competitive mid-to-high-end tier. The 8060S, with an average score of 55757, sits in the 87th percentile, with its closest competitor being the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (0.1% faster). Interestingly, the data also lists the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 as a rival with a -0.6% deltaPct, meaning the 8060S is actually 0.6% faster in this aggregate metric, a surprising data point that highlights the 8060S's strong overall showing.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the benchmark data, the use cases for these two GPUs are almost polar opposites.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the clear winner for compute-heavy workloads. Its 37.6% lead in Geekbench OpenCL is the single most important metric for its target audience. This GPU is designed for tasks that rely on massive parallel processing, such as scientific simulations, data analysis, and content creation pipelines that leverage OpenCL acceleration. The PRO V710's 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus provides 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth, a figure that is essential for feeding large datasets to its 3456 shading units. Its lack of display outputs confirms its role as a dedicated compute accelerator, not a desktop graphics card.

Conversely, the AMD Radeon 8060S wins in scenarios that demand modern graphics performance within a constrained power envelope. Its 60.5% lead in 3Dmark Steel Nomad DX12 indicates it is the superior choice for DirectX 12 gaming and 3D rendering. As an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 55 W TDP, it is designed to be a part of a mobile platform, offering a level of gaming performance that is highly impressive for a chip integrated into a processor. The 8060S's use of "System Shared" memory means it leverages fast system memory, and its high 2900 MHz boost clock helps it punch above its weight in graphics-intensive tasks. It is the better option for a portable device where gaming capability and power efficiency are the primary goals.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a higher average benchmark score of 58657, compared to the AMD Radeon 8060S's 55757.

Q: How much faster is the AMD Radeon 8060S in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S is 60.5% faster than the AMD Radeon PRO V710 in this test, scoring 2162 versus 853.

Q: What is the performance difference in the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 37.6% faster, with a score of 116460 compared to the 8060S's 84626.

Q: Which GPU is positioned higher in the overall performance percentile?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, while the AMD Radeon 8060S is in the 87th percentile.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon PRO V710 have any display outputs?

A: No, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 has no display outputs, indicating it is intended for compute tasks rather than rendering to a screen.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W, while the AMD Radeon 8060S is an integrated GPU with a much lower TDP of 55 W.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets for these two GPUs are a study in contrast. The most fundamental difference is in their memory subsystems. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 comes with a dedicated 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD Radeon 8060S, as an integrated part of a processor, relies on "System Shared" memory, with its bandwidth being "System Dependent." This is a critical distinction that directly impacts compute performance.

The compute configurations also differ significantly. The PRO V710 has 3456 shading units, 216 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The 8060S has fewer of each, with 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. This translates to a large difference in raw compute throughput. The PRO V710 is rated for 27.65 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the 8060S is rated for 14.85 TFLOPS. Similarly, the PRO V710's pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 432.0 GTexel/s, while the 8060S's are 185.6 GPixel/s and 464.0 GTexel/s, respectively.

Clock speeds show an interesting divergence. The PRO V710 has a high base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost of 2000 MHz, while the 8060S has a lower base of 1295 MHz but a much higher boost clock of 2900 MHz. The 8060S's high boost clock helps it achieve its strong 3DMark result despite having fewer cores. Power and physical characteristics are also completely different. The PRO V710 is a single-slot card with a 158 W TDP, requiring a 1x 8-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. The 8060S is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 55 W TDP, requiring no power connectors. The PRO V710 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the 8060S uses the newer PCIe 5.0 x16. Finally, the PRO V710 has no display outputs, while the 8060S's outputs are "Portable Device Dependent."

Architecture Differences

These two GPUs represent two distinct generations of AMD's RDNA architecture. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 32 chip, and is part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 346 mm² and a transistor count of 28,100 million. Its codename is "Wheat Nas." In contrast, the AMD Radeon 8060S is based on the newer RDNA 3.5 architecture, using the "Strix Halo" chip, and belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. It is built on a more advanced 4 nm process at TSMC, with a smaller die size of 308 mm², though its transistor count is listed as unknown.

The architectural differences extend beyond the node. The PRO V710 is a discrete GPU designed for workstation compute, while the 8060S is an integrated GPU (IGP) designed for mobile platforms. This is reflected in their power and form factors. The PRO V710's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, while the 8060S's predecessor is the Polaris Mobile, showing their different lineages. Both support the same API feature set, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. However, the newer RDNA 3.5 architecture in the 8060S, with its higher boost clock and efficiency, is clearly optimized for a different set of priorities—maximizing performance within a limited power budget for portable devices. The PRO V710, with its larger die, more compute units, and dedicated high-bandwidth memory, is optimized for sustained, heavy compute workloads where power draw is less of a concern. The release dates also show a generation gap, with the PRO V710 releasing in October 2024 and the 8060S following in January 2025.