AMD Radeon 8050S vs NVIDIA P102-100 Comparison

AMD Radeon 8050S and NVIDIA P102-100 are two graphics processors that occupy very different positions in the hardware landscape, yet their benchmark averages place them within a few percentage points of each other. The AMD part, a modern integrated graphics solution built on RDNA 3.5, trades blows with the older NVIDIA discrete mining card, which lacks display outputs entirely. The data shows a clear split: the Radeon 8050S dominates in OpenCL compute workloads, while the P102-100 takes a decisive lead in Vulkan performance. This makes the choice between them highly dependent on the specific application, rather than a simple matter of overall superiority.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results split cleanly along API lines. The AMD Radeon 8050S wins the Geekbench OpenCL test, a compute-oriented benchmark that stresses general-purpose GPU processing. Its score of 65,818 points is a substantial 32.7% higher than the NVIDIA P102-100’s 49,602 points in the same test. This indicates that for workloads leveraging OpenCL—such as certain scientific computing tasks, video encoding filters, or physics simulations—the Radeon 8050S offers significantly more raw compute throughput. The architecture’s design, with its 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, likely contributes to this strength, as it can process half-precision data at the same rate as full-precision, a feature absent on the Pascal-based NVIDIA card.

Conversely, the NVIDIA P102-100 wins the Geekbench Vulkan test, which measures graphics and compute performance through the modern Vulkan API. Here, the NVIDIA card scores 67,454 points, which is 13.4% higher than the Radeon 8050S’s 58,398 points. This suggests that for gaming or rendering workloads that utilize Vulkan, the P102-100 holds a distinct advantage. The NVIDIA card’s higher shading unit count (3,200 vs 2,048) and higher boost clock (1,683 MHz vs 2,800 MHz) contribute to this result, but the win is specifically tied to the Vulkan API, not a general performance lead. The data does not show the P102-100 winning in any other test, so its strength is narrowly defined to this specific API.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs represent opposite ends of the design spectrum, separated by seven years of technological evolution. The AMD Radeon 8050S is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, featuring a die size of 308 mm². In contrast, the NVIDIA P102-100 uses the older 16 nm process, also at TSMC, with a much larger die of 471 mm². This process advantage allows the AMD part to pack a modern RDNA 3.5 architecture into a smaller area, while the NVIDIA card, based on the Pascal architecture, relies on a larger, less dense chip. The transistor counts reflect this: the Radeon 8050S’s count is listed as unknown, while the P102-100 contains 11,800 million transistors, yielding a density of 25.1M per mm².

Memory configurations differ fundamentally. The Radeon 8050S uses System Shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and instead borrows from the system’s main memory. Its bandwidth is therefore listed as "System Dependent," a variable that changes with the host platform. The P102-100, however, has 5 GB of dedicated GDDR5X memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering a fixed bandwidth of 440.3 GB/s. This is a crucial distinction for workloads that require large, high-speed data transfers, as the NVIDIA card’s dedicated memory is likely faster and more consistent than shared system memory. The Radeon 8050S’s memory clock is also listed as "System Shared," while the P102-100 runs its memory at 1376 MHz, with 11 Gbps effective speed.

Feature support also diverges. The Radeon 8050S includes 32 ray tracing cores, a feature entirely absent from the P102-100, which has no RT cores. It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the NVIDIA card is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, but the Radeon’s newer architecture allows for more advanced rendering techniques. The Radeon 8050S is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors and a slot width of "IGP," while the P102-100 is a dual-slot card requiring two 8-pin power connectors and a 600 W suggested PSU. The NVIDIA card also has no display outputs, making it unsuitable for any direct video connection, whereas the Radeon 8050S’s outputs are "Portable Device Dependent," indicating it is designed for laptops where the display is built-in.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two benchmark tests provide a stark contrast in performance outcomes. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the AMD Radeon 8050S achieves a score of 65,818, compared to the NVIDIA P102-100’s 49,602. This is a 32.7% advantage for the Radeon, a massive margin that highlights the efficiency of the newer RDNA 3.5 architecture in compute tasks. The Radeon’s FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS is higher than the NVIDIA card’s 10.77 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is identical at 11.47 TFLOPS, whereas the P102-100’s FP16 is a mere 168.3 GFLOPS (1:64 ratio). This architectural difference in half-precision processing is a primary reason for the Radeon’s OpenCL dominance.

In the Geekbench Vulkan test, the tables turn. The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 67,454, beating the AMD Radeon 8050S’s 58,398 by 13.4%. This is a significant reversal, given that the Radeon has a higher boost clock (2,800 MHz vs 1,683 MHz) and more modern architecture. The P102-100’s higher pixel rate (134.6 GPixel/s vs 179.2 GPixel/s for AMD) is actually lower, but its texture rate (336.6 GTexel/s) is close to the Radeon’s (358.4 GTexel/s). The Vulkan win likely stems from the NVIDIA card’s higher shading unit count (3,200 vs 2,048) and the maturity of NVIDIA’s Vulkan drivers on the Pascal architecture. The Radeon 8050S’s average benchmark score is 62,108, while the P102-100’s is 58,528, putting the AMD part ahead by about 6% overall, but this aggregate hides the per-API split.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear, workload-specific verdict. For users prioritizing compute-heavy tasks that leverage OpenCL, the AMD Radeon 8050S is the superior choice, offering a 32.7% performance advantage in that specific benchmark. Its modern 4 nm process, ray tracing support, and higher FP32/FP16 throughput make it a more future-proof option for general-purpose GPU computing. The Radeon 8050S also holds a slight edge in average benchmark score (62,108 vs 58,528), placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, compared to the P102-100’s 88th percentile.

For users whose primary workloads run on Vulkan, the NVIDIA P102-100 is the better option, despite its age. Its 13.4% lead in the Vulkan benchmark is substantial, and its dedicated 5 GB of GDDR5X memory with 440.3 GB/s bandwidth offers a level of consistency that the Radeon’s shared memory cannot guarantee. However, the P102-100’s lack of display outputs and its end-of-life production status are major caveats. It cannot be used as a standard graphics card for any visual output, and its 250 W TDP, dual-slot design, and two 8-pin power connectors make it a demanding component. The Radeon 8050S, in contrast, is a 55 W IGP with no power connectors, making it far more energy-efficient and easier to integrate. The choice ultimately comes down to whether Vulkan performance or OpenCL performance is more critical, with the Radeon 8050S being the more versatile and modern option for most users, while the P102-100 appeals specifically to those running Vulkan-based compute tasks and can accommodate its power and space requirements.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S has a higher average benchmark score of 62,108, compared to the NVIDIA P102-100’s 58,528. This places the Radeon in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, while the NVIDIA card sits in the 88th percentile.

Q: How large is the performance difference in the Geekbench OpenCL test?

A: In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the AMD Radeon 8050S scores 65,818 points, which is 32.7% higher than the NVIDIA P102-100’s 49,602 points. This is the largest performance gap between the two cards in any benchmark.

Q: Does the NVIDIA P102-100 support ray tracing?

A: No, the NVIDIA P102-100 has no ray tracing cores. In contrast, the AMD Radeon 8050S includes 32 ray tracing cores, which is a notable architectural difference between the two.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the AMD Radeon 8050S?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S uses System Shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM. Its memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared," and its bandwidth is "System Dependent," varying with the host system.

Q: Can the NVIDIA P102-100 be used to connect a display?

A: No, the NVIDIA P102-100 has no display outputs. It is designed for mining or compute purposes, while the AMD Radeon 8050S has display outputs that are "Portable Device Dependent," suitable for integrated laptop displays.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S has a TDP of 55 W and requires no power connectors, as it is an integrated graphics processor. The NVIDIA P102-100 has a TDP of 250 W, requires two 8-pin power connectors, and has a suggested PSU of 600 W.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 8050S | NVIDIA P102-100 |

|----------------|-------------------|------------------|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Pascal |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 16 nm |

| Die Size | 308 mm² | 471 mm² |

| Transistors | Unknown | 11,800 million |

| Transistor Density | N/A | 25.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 1582 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz | 1683 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 5 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR5X |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 320 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 440.3 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 3200 |

| TMUs | 128 | 200 |

| ROPs | 64 | 80 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 0 |

| Pixel Rate | 179.2 GPixel/s | 134.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 358.4 GTexel/s | 336.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 11.47 TFLOPS | 10.77 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1) | 168.3 GFLOPS (1:64) |

| TDP | 55 W | 250 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | N/A | 600 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x4 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |