AMD Radeon 8050S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER Comparison

The AMD Radeon 8050S and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER occupy vastly different tiers of the mobile and desktop GPU markets, respectively. The data positions the Radeon 8050S as a highly efficient integrated processor aimed at thin-and-light systems, while the RTX 4080 SUPER is a discrete, triple-slot desktop powerhouse. Benchmark results show a decisive performance gap, with the RTX 4080 SUPER dominating in compute workloads, yet the Radeon 8050S holds distinct advantages in power draw and physical footprint that cater to entirely different use cases.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The direct comparison between these two GPUs is stark, based on the two shared benchmark results available. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER scores 219065, while the AMD Radeon 8050S scores 65818. This translates to a delta of -70% for the AMD part, meaning the RTX 4080 SUPER delivers more than three times the raw compute performance in this API. The margin is even wider in the Geekbench Vulkan test, where the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 260075 against the Radeon 8050S’s 58398, a delta of -77.5%. These are not marginal differences; they represent a fundamental gulf in processing capability.

Looking at the average benchmark scores reinforces this hierarchy. The Radeon 8050S achieves an average score of 62108, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, scores 61896, a mere 0.3% difference, indicating the 8050S is competitively positioned within its own class of mobile-integrated graphics. In contrast, the RTX 4080 SUPER’s average score is 54209, which is lower than the Radeon’s average, yet it sits in the 86th percentile. This seeming contradiction is resolved by examining the benchmark suites: the RTX 4080 SUPER’s average is dragged down by its inclusion of legacy DirectX 9, 10, and 11 Passmark tests where it scores 381, 193, and 301 respectively, alongside its dominant 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 and Passmark G3D score of 34245.

The RTX 4080 SUPER’s advantage is further contextualized by its nearest rivals. It sits just 0.1% behind the non-SUPER RTX 4080, with an average score of 54247, and is 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X. Notably, it is 2.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8060S, which is the top-tier Strix Halo part from AMD, showing that even the fastest integrated solution from AMD’s latest generation trails NVIDIA’s discrete offering. While the Radeon 8050S leads its closest competitor by 0.3%, the RTX 4080 SUPER leads the Radeon 8060S by 2.8%, showing a larger performance gap at the top of the stack.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two parts is profound, starting with their fundamental design philosophies. The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built on the Strix Halo chip, utilizing the RDNA 3.5 architecture. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 308 mm². Notably, its transistor count is listed as unknown, but the die size suggests a dense, power-optimized design. The RTX 4080 SUPER, conversely, is a discrete GPU based on the AD103 chip, using the Ada Lovelace architecture, and is built on a 5 nm process. Its die is larger at 379 mm², and it packs 45,900 million transistors, achieving a transistor density of 121.1M per mm².

The compute resources differ by an order of magnitude. The Radeon 8050S has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 render output units (ROPs). The RTX 4080 SUPER has 10240 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. This disparity is reflected in raw throughput: the Radeon 8050S delivers 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the RTX 4080 SUPER delivers 52.22 TFLOPS. Similarly, texture fill rates are 358.4 GTexel/s for AMD versus 816.0 GTexel/s for NVIDIA, and pixel rates are 179.2 GPixel/s versus 285.6 GPixel/s.

Memory architecture further separates them. The Radeon 8050S uses system-shared memory, meaning its bandwidth is system-dependent and it has no dedicated VRAM. The RTX 4080 SUPER features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This dedicated memory is critical for high-resolution textures and complex scenes. Ray tracing and AI capabilities also differ: the Radeon 8050S has 32 RT cores but no tensor cores, while the RTX 4080 SUPER has 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The power envelope is the final major separator: the Radeon 8050S sips at 55 W with no power connectors, while the RTX 4080 SUPER is rated at 320 W and requires a single 16-pin connector and a suggested 700 W power supply.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon 8050S wins decisively in efficiency and physical integration. With a 55 W TDP and a slot width of IGP, it requires no dedicated power connectors and consumes a fraction of the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 320 W. This makes it suitable for portable devices where battery life and thermal limits are paramount. Its performance, while far lower in absolute terms, is still respectable: it ranks in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, outperforming its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, by 0.3%. For mobile workloads like light content creation, office productivity, or casual gaming, the 8050S provides a capable baseline without the need for a discrete graphics card. Its system-shared memory also allows for flexible allocation, though bandwidth is system-dependent.

The RTX 4080 SUPER wins in every measurable performance category. It is 70% faster in OpenCL and 77.5% faster in Vulkan compute. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 6600, a result not even available for the Radeon 8050S, indicating its capability in modern, demanding game engines. Its Passmark G3D score of 34245 dwarfs any compute result from the AMD part. With 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth, it is built for 4K gaming, ray tracing, and professional 3D rendering. The 320 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for AI-accelerated workloads, and the 80 RT cores handle ray-traced effects efficiently. It is a triple-slot card measuring 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, demanding a full-size desktop chassis.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 8050S compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER in raw compute performance?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER is significantly faster. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 219065 versus 65818 for the Radeon 8050S, a delta of -70%. In Vulkan, the gap widens to -77.5%, with scores of 260075 and 58398 respectively.

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S has a higher average benchmark score at 62108, compared to the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 54209. However, this is influenced by the RTX 4080 SUPER’s inclusion of legacy DirectX 9, 10, and 11 Passmark tests, where it scores lowly (381, 193, and 301), and its high-end 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6600.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The Radeon 8050S has a 55 W TDP and uses no power connectors, being an integrated processor. The RTX 4080 SUPER has a 320 W TDP, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested 700 W power supply.

Q: What are the key memory differences?

A: The Radeon 8050S uses system-shared memory, with size, type, and bandwidth all listed as system-dependent. The RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How do their physical sizes differ?

A: The Radeon 8050S is an IGP with a slot width of IGP, meaning it is integrated into the processor. The RTX 4080 SUPER is a triple-slot discrete card with dimensions of 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width.

Q: Which GPU is closer to its nearest rival in performance?

A: The Radeon 8050S is 0.3% ahead of its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M. The RTX 4080 SUPER is 0.1% behind its nearest rival, the RTX 4080, and 2.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8060S.

The Verdict

Choosing between these two GPUs is not a matter of performance but of platform and purpose. The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the superior performer in every head-to-head benchmark, with a 70% to 77.5% lead in compute tasks. Its 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 power, 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6X memory, and 320 tensor cores make it the only choice for high-end gaming, professional rendering, or AI development. It sits among the top tier of desktop GPUs, and its nearest rival being the RTX 4080 itself confirms its position.

The AMD Radeon 8050S, conversely, is a marvel of efficiency and integration. At 55 W, it delivers a level of performance that places it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, which is remarkable for an integrated solution. Its nearest rival is the Radeon Pro W6600M, and it edges that card out by 0.3%. It is designed for laptops and compact systems where space and power are at a premium. For users who need a capable GPU for everyday tasks, light gaming, and portable productivity, the 8050S offers a compelling integrated package without the need for a discrete card. The verdict is clear: for maximum performance, choose the RTX 4080 SUPER; for maximum portability and efficiency, choose the Radeon 8050S.