AMD Radeon 8050S vs NVIDIA CMP 90HX Comparison

# NVIDIA CMP 90HX vs AMD Radeon 8050S

The NVIDIA CMP 90HX is the faster GPU in raw compute benchmarks, scoring 69000 in Geekbench OpenCL against the AMD Radeon 8050S's 65818 — a 4.8% advantage. However, the AMD Radeon 8050S is a fundamentally different product: a 55 W integrated graphics solution from 2025, while the CMP 90HX is an end-of-life 320 W mining card from 2021 with no display outputs. The data shows these are not direct competitors; the CMP 90HX wins the only head-to-head benchmark, but the Radeon 8050S offers modern connectivity (PCIe 5.0 x16), active production status, and a portable form factor that the NVIDIA card simply cannot match. The verdict depends entirely on whether the use case demands raw compute (CMP 90HX) or integrated efficiency and current-gen platform support (Radeon 8050S).

The Verdict

The NVIDIA CMP 90HX is the choice for pure compute throughput. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 69000 places it in the 90th percentile of all GPUs, while the AMD Radeon 8050S sits at the 89th percentile with an average benchmark score of 62108 across two tests. In the direct head-to-head OpenCL comparison, the CMP 90HX leads by 4.8% — a modest but consistent margin.

Yet the Radeon 8050S wins on every practical metric for a modern system builder. It is an active product released in 2025, consumes 55 W versus 320 W, requires no power connectors, uses system-shared memory, and is built for portable devices. The CMP 90HX is end-of-life, has no display outputs, demands a 700 W power supply, and uses a PCIe 1.0 x4 interface that severely limits data transfer in modern systems.

The data-driven conclusion: choose the CMP 90HX only for dedicated compute workloads where the 4.8% OpenCL lead and 10 GB of dedicated GDDR6X memory matter more than power, connectivity, and usability. Choose the Radeon 8050S for any integrated or mobile application where the 55 W TDP, PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, and active driver support are non-negotiable. The Radeon 8050S's predecessor is Polaris Mobile, indicating a lineage of mobile-focused designs, whereas the CMP 90HX belongs to NVIDIA's Mining GPUs generation — a category explicitly divorced from consumer display use.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap is generational and process-driven. The CMP 90HX uses NVIDIA's Ampere architecture on the GA102 chip, fabricated by Samsung on an 8 nm process with 28,300 million transistors across a 628 mm² die. The Radeon 8050S uses AMD's RDNA 3.5 architecture on the Strix Halo chip, built by TSMC on a 4 nm process with a 308 mm² die size. The transistor density comparison is stark: the CMP 90HX achieves 45.1 million transistors per square millimeter, while the Radeon 8050S's density is not disclosed — but the 4 nm node inherently packs more logic into less space.

Core counts diverge significantly. The CMP 90HX has 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs, along with 50 ray tracing cores and 200 tensor cores. The Radeon 8050S has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores, with no tensor cores listed. Despite fewer cores, the Radeon 8050S achieves higher pixel and texture rates: 179.2 GPixel/s and 358.4 GTexel/s versus the CMP 90HX's 136.8 GPixel/s and 342.0 GTexel/s. This reflects the RDNA 3.5 architecture's efficiency at higher boost clocks — 2800 MHz versus 1710 MHz.

Memory architecture is another major split. The CMP 90HX uses 10 GB of GDDR6X on a 320-bit bus with 760.3 GB/s bandwidth and a 19 Gbps effective memory clock. The Radeon 8050S uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth and no dedicated VRAM. The CMP 90HX also has a base clock of 1500 MHz versus the Radeon's 1295 MHz, though the AMD part boosts far higher.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API-level feature parity exists. But the CMP 90HX's FP32 compute of 21.89 TFLOPS nearly doubles the Radeon 8050S's 11.47 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance matches at 21.89 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1).

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Only one direct comparison exists in the data: Geekbench OpenCL. The CMP 90HX scores 69000 against the Radeon 8050S's 65818, yielding a 4.8% win for NVIDIA. This is the sole head-to-head result, and it favors the CMP 90HX, but the margin is smaller than the FP32 compute gap might suggest — the Radeon 8050S's higher clock efficiency (2800 MHz boost) partially compensates for its lower core count.

The CMP 90HX's nearest rivals in overall performance are the Intel Arc A770 (68809, 0.3% behind), AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (68562, 0.6% behind), AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (69870, 1.2% ahead), and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (69986, 1.4% ahead). This places the CMP 90HX in a tight cluster where a 4.8% lead over the Radeon 8050S is significant but not overwhelming.

The Radeon 8050S's average benchmark score of 62108 is lower than its OpenCL result because its Vulkan score of 58398 drags the average down. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61896, 0.3% behind), Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63693, 2.5% ahead), Radeon RX 7600M (63775, 2.6% ahead), and Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (63830, 2.7% ahead). The Radeon 8050S is competitive with mobile and low-profile desktop GPUs, but it trails the CMP 90HX in raw OpenCL throughput.

The wins tally confirms this: the CMP 90HX wins 1 head-to-head benchmark, the Radeon 8050S wins 0. However, the Radeon 8050S has two benchmark entries (OpenCL and Vulkan) versus the CMP 90HX's single entry, so the comparison is inherently limited.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA CMP 90HX, with 21.89 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16, compared to the AMD Radeon 8050S's 11.47 TFLOPS in both. The CMP 90HX also wins the Geekbench OpenCL test 69000 to 65818, a 4.8% advantage.

Q: Can the NVIDIA CMP 90HX be used for display output?

A: No. The CMP 90HX has no display outputs, while the AMD Radeon 8050S has display outputs that are portable-device dependent. The CMP 90HX was designed for mining, not for driving monitors.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The CMP 90HX has a 320 W TDP, requires two 8-pin power connectors, and needs a 700 W suggested power supply. The Radeon 8050S has a 55 W TDP and requires no power connectors, making it suitable for integrated portable designs.

Q: How do their memory systems differ?

A: The CMP 90HX has 10 GB of dedicated GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus with 760.3 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon 8050S uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, meaning its performance varies based on the host system's memory configuration.

Q: Which GPU has better connectivity for modern systems?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S, which uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The CMP 90HX uses PCIe 1.0 x4, a severely outdated interface that will bottleneck data transfer even if the GPU's compute power is sufficient.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The CMP 90HX is end-of-life, released in 2021. The Radeon 8050S is active, released in 2025, and has a predecessor in Polaris Mobile, indicating an ongoing product line.

Where Each One Wins

The CMP 90HX wins in raw compute density. Its 21.89 TFLOPS FP32 output, 10 GB dedicated GDDR6X memory, and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth make it superior for compute-heavy workloads that can tolerate its lack of display outputs and PCIe 1.0 x4 interface. The 4.8% OpenCL lead over the Radeon 8050S, combined with a 90th percentile ranking versus 89th, confirms its edge in pure throughput. It also has tensor cores (200) that the Radeon 8050S lacks entirely, making it more suitable for AI inference tasks — though its mining-oriented design limits practical deployment.

The Radeon 8050S wins in efficiency and integration. At 55 W, it consumes 17% of the CMP 90HX's 320 W TDP, requires no external power, and fits as an IGP in portable devices. Its PCIe 5.0 x16 interface is five generations ahead of the CMP 90HX's PCIe 1.0 x4, enabling far faster system-level data movement. Its higher pixel rate (179.2 GPixel/s) and texture rate (358.4 GTexel/s) suggest better rasterization efficiency per watt, despite lower absolute FP32. The Radeon 8050S also offers Vulkan support with a score of 58398, a benchmark the CMP 90HX lacks entirely.

For gaming or general desktop use, the Radeon 8050S is the only viable option because the CMP 90HX has no display outputs. For headless compute servers where power is less constrained, the CMP 90HX's 4.8% performance lead and dedicated memory make it the stronger choice — but the PCIe 1.0 x4 interface will negate much of that advantage in real-world data transfer. The Radeon 8050S is also actively produced, ensuring driver updates and availability, while the CMP 90HX is end-of-life.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA CMP 90HX | AMD Radeon 8050S |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.5 |

| Process Node | 8 nm (Samsung) | 4 nm (TSMC) |

| Die Size | 628 mm² | 308 mm² |

| Transistors | 28,300 million | Unknown |

| Base Clock | 1500 MHz | 1295 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 2800 MHz |

| Memory Size | 10 GB GDDR6X | System Shared |

| Memory Bus | 320 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 760.3 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 6400 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 200 | 128 |

| ROPs | 80 | 64 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 50 | 32 |

| Tensor Cores | 200 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 136.8 GPixel/s | 179.2 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 342.0 GTexel/s | 358.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 21.89 TFLOPS | 11.47 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 21.89 TFLOPS (1:1) | 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 320 W | 55 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 700 W | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 1.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2021-07-27 | 2025-01-05 |

| Dimensions | 285 mm x 112 mm | Not specified |

The CMP 90HX is physically larger, consumes nearly six times the power, and uses six-year-old interface technology. The Radeon 8050S is a modern integrated solution with no dimensions, no power connectors, and shared memory — a fundamentally different product class. The only shared traits are DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support, which do not compensate for the divergence in every other hardware specification.