AMD Radeon 760M vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison, as the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no benchmark scores listed in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, with no individual test results available. The AMD Radeon 760M, conversely, has a full set of ten benchmark entries across DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute workloads.

The AMD Radeon 760M achieves an average benchmark score of 6019 across its recorded tests. Its strongest results come from the Geekbench Vulkan test at 30336, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 20255. In Passmark testing, the 760M scores 5310 in G3D, 2840 in GPU compute, 890 in G2D, and lower scores in legacy DirectX tests: 65 in DirectX 9, 52 in DirectX 11, 25 in DirectX 12, and 19 in DirectX 10. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test records a score of 400.

The database places the Radeon 760M at the 35th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6400 with an average score of 6001, a delta of 0.3 percent relative to the 760M. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M also averages 6000, again a 0.3 percent delta. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server averages 5996, a 0.4 percent delta, while the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 averages 6049, which places it 0.5 percent ahead of the 760M. These four rivals cluster tightly around the 760M's average score, indicating that the 760M sits in a competitive band where performance differences are minimal, within a fraction of a percent.

For the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA, the absence of benchmark scores means no direct numerical comparison is possible from the database. Its percentile ranking is listed at 50, but with zero recorded benchmark results, this percentile appears to reflect its position in the database rather than measured performance. The head-to-head benchmark section in the database is empty, and neither item records any wins in the winsA or winsB fields.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs differ fundamentally in their underlying designs. The AMD Radeon 760M uses the Phoenix chip built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, belonging to the Navi III IGP generation. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 142.6 million transistors per square millimeter. The 760M is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 15 W TDP, no power connectors, and a slot width listed as IGP. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip with an architecture designated as TrueGPU, part of the 7G100 generation. It is built on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, though its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown. This is a discrete, dual-slot card with a 225 W TDP, requiring a single 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

The compute resources differ substantially. The Radeon 760M has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 render output units, and 8 ray tracing cores. The LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, with no ray tracing cores listed. This represents a 12x difference in shading units, 6x in TMUs, and 6x in ROPs favoring the LX ULTRA.

Clock speeds follow different patterns. The 760M has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2599 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no base or boost clock recorded, but its memory operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The 760M uses system shared memory, making its bandwidth system dependent, while the LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The pixel and texture rates reflect the resource disparity. The LX ULTRA produces 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, versus 41.58 GPixel/s and 83.17 GTexel/s for the 760M. Floating point performance shows the LX ULTRA at 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, while the 760M delivers 5.323 TFLOPS FP32 and 5.323 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio.

API support overlaps on DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The 760M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs differ: the 760M is motherboard dependent, while the LX ULTRA has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Radeon 760M wins in every measurable benchmark category, simply because it has recorded scores and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has none. The 760M demonstrates capability across a range of workloads, from legacy DirectX 9 at 65 points to modern Vulkan at 30336 points, and from 2D graphics at 890 to compute at 2840.

The architecture data nonetheless indicates where each design is positioned. The Radeon 760M, as a 15 W integrated solution, is suited to compact systems where power draw and physical footprint are constrained. Its 4 nm process and 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die show a dense, efficient implementation. The 800 MHz base and 2599 MHz boost clocks, combined with 5.323 TFLOPS FP32, place it in the lower tier of the database, around the 35th percentile.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA, with its 225 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, 24 GB GDDR6 memory, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, targets workloads requiring large memory pools and high throughput. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 figures are roughly 4.6x and 9.2x the 760M's respective numbers. The 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate is 4.6x higher, and the 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate is 4.6x higher. These figures suggest the LX ULTRA is designed for compute-heavy or high-resolution tasks where the 760M's system shared memory and 15 W envelope would be limiting.

The 760M's ray tracing cores, 8 of them, give it a feature the LX ULTRA lacks, as the latter has no RT cores listed. The 760M also supports Vulkan 1.4 versus 1.3 for the LX ULTRA. These differences matter for specific software paths, though without benchmark scores for the LX ULTRA, the practical impact cannot be quantified from the database.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon 760M?

A: The Radeon 760M has an average benchmark score of 6019 across its ten recorded tests.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores for the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA?

A: No, the database lists zero benchmark results for the LX ULTRA, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: How does the Radeon 760M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 760M sits within 0.5 percent of its four nearest rivals. The AMD Radeon RX 6400 (6001, +0.3%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (6000, +0.3%), and NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (5996, +0.4%) are slightly behind, while the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 (6049, -0.5%) is slightly ahead.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The Radeon 760M uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, compared to 512 for the AMD Radeon 760M.

Q: What are the TDP differences between the two?

A: The Radeon 760M has a 15 W TDP, while the LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two GPUs in the database:

• Chip: AMD Radeon 760M uses Phoenix; Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses 7G105.
• Architecture: RDNA 3.0 versus TrueGPU.
• Generation: Navi III IGP (Phoenix) versus 7G100.
• Process Node: 4 nm versus 6 nm, both at TSMC.
• Transistors: 25,390 million versus unknown.
• Die Size: 178 mm² versus unknown.
• Transistor Density: 142.6M per mm² versus not listed.
• Base Clock: 800 MHz versus not listed.
• Boost Clock: 2599 MHz versus not listed.
• Memory Clock: System Shared versus 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective.
• Memory Size: System Shared versus 24 GB GDDR6.
• Memory Bus Width: System Shared versus 192 bit.
• Memory Bandwidth: System Dependent versus 432.0 GB/s.
• Shading Units: 512 versus 6144.
• TMUs: 32 versus 192.
• ROPs: 16 versus 96.
• RT Cores: 8 versus not listed.
• Pixel Rate: 41.58 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s.
• Texture Rate: 83.17 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.
• FP32: 5.323 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS.
• FP16: 5.323 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).
• TDP: 15 W versus 225 W.
• Slot Width: IGP versus Dual-slot.
• Power Connectors: None versus 1x 16-pin.
• Suggested PSU: Not listed versus 550 W.
• Bus Interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 4.0 x16.
• Display Outputs: Motherboard Dependent versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.
• Vulkan Version: 1.4 versus 1.3.
• Dimensions: Not listed versus 268 mm length, 112 mm height, 40 mm width.
• Release Date: 2024-01-30 versus 2026-03-16.
• Predecessor: Navi II IGP versus not listed.
• Average Benchmark Score: 6019 versus 0.
• Percentile: 35 versus 50.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split. The AMD Radeon 760M is the only one of the two with measured performance, and its results place it at the 35th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 6019. It is a 15 W integrated part on a 4 nm process, using system shared memory, and it includes 8 ray tracing cores and Vulkan 1.4 support. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.5 percent of its average score, confirm that it performs in a tight competitive band around the 6000 mark.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no benchmark scores, so the database offers no measured evidence of its performance. What the data does show is a discrete, dual-slot card with a 225 W TDP, 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, 6144 shading units, and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. These specifications indicate a design aimed at high-throughput workloads, but without recorded results, any performance claim cannot be verified against the database.

For a buyer choosing between these two, the Radeon 760M offers the only verified benchmark data, making it the only one with a measurable track record. The LX ULTRA, despite its larger compute resources and memory capacity, has no recorded scores to confirm its capabilities. The choice depends on whether verified performance data or unverified specification headroom matters more, and the database currently supports only the former.