AMD Radeon 760M vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a stark contrast between two active GPUs with fundamentally different positioning. The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built on the Phoenix chip, designed for low-power systems with a 15 W TDP. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a discrete, dual-slot add-in card with a 225 W TDP, 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, and a 192-bit memory bus. The LX 7G100 holds a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database, while the Radeon 760M sits at the 35th percentile. Based on the specification sheet alone, the LX 7G100 is the significantly more capable compute and graphics solution. However, the Radeon 760M has a complete set of recorded benchmark scores, whereas the LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark entries, meaning its average benchmark score is listed as zero. The verdict from the data is that the LX 7G100 is intended for users who need a high-throughput discrete GPU with substantial memory bandwidth, while the Radeon 760M is for those who require a low-power integrated solution that still delivers a measurable level of 3D performance. The absence of benchmark data for the LX 7G100 means its real-world performance cannot be verified against the Radeon 760M in the database, so the verdict must rest on architectural and specification differences.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, with 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to the AMD Radeon 760M's 5.323 TFLOPS.

Q: What are the memory configurations of the two GPUs?

A: The Radeon 760M uses System Shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). They also both support OpenGL 4.6. The Radeon 760M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What is the process node and foundry for each chip?

A: Both are manufactured by TSMC. The Radeon 760M uses a 4 nm process, while the LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm process.

Q: Does the LX 7G100 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the LX 7G100, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero. The Radeon 760M has ten recorded benchmark scores, including a 5310 in Passmark G3D and a 20255 in Geekbench OpenCL.

Q: How do the pixel and texture rates compare?

A: The LX 7G100 has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s. The Radeon 760M has a pixel rate of 41.58 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 83.17 GTexel/s.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on different architectural foundations. The AMD Radeon 760M is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, specifically part of the Navi III IGP (Phoenix) generation. It is a single-die design with 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The chip integrates 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 raster output units, and 8 ray tracing cores. The Radeon 760M operates as an IGP, meaning it shares system memory and has no dedicated VRAM, with memory type and bus width listed as System Shared.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture, with a chip identifier of 7G106 and a generation name of 7G100. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the transistor count and die size are listed as unknown. The LX 7G100 is a discrete card with 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It has no listed ray tracing cores. The card features dedicated memory: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz and 18 Gbps effective, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX 7G100 also has a much larger physical footprint, measuring 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width, and it occupies a dual-slot form factor. The Radeon 760M, by contrast, is an IGP with no slot width and no power connectors.

Another architectural difference is in FP16 compute. The Radeon 760M delivers 5.323 TFLOPS of FP16, which matches its FP32 rate at a 1:1 ratio. The LX 7G100 delivers 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16, which is a 2:1 ratio relative to its FP32 rate of 24.58 TFLOPS. This indicates the LX 7G100 has a different execution path for half-precision arithmetic. The supported APIs also differ slightly: both use DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the Radeon 760M supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every major specification field. The Radeon 760M has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2599 MHz, while the LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock listed. The Radeon 760M has a TDP of 15 W and uses no power connectors; the LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested power supply of 550 W. The Radeon 760M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs differ: the Radeon 760M's outputs are motherboard dependent, while the LX 7G100 has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Radeon 760M has no dimensions listed and no slot width, whereas the LX 7G100 is a dual-slot card with specific length, height, and width measurements. The Radeon 760M's memory is system shared with system-dependent bandwidth; the LX 7G100 has 12 GB GDDR6, a 192-bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The shading unit count is 512 for the Radeon 760M versus 6144 for the LX 7G100. TMUs are 32 versus 192, and ROPs are 16 versus 96. The Radeon 760M has 8 ray tracing cores, while the LX 7G100 has none listed. The Radeon 760M's pixel rate is 41.58 GPixel/s and texture rate is 83.17 GTexel/s; the LX 7G100's pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. The Radeon 760M's FP32 is 5.323 TFLOPS, FP16 is 5.323 TFLOPS; the LX 7G100's FP32 is 24.58 TFLOPS, FP16 is 49.15 TFLOPS. The Radeon 760M was released on 2024-01-30, the LX 7G100 on 2026-06-17. The Radeon 760M's predecessor is listed as Navi II IGP, while the LX 7G100 has no predecessor. Neither has a launch MSRP in the record.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between the Radeon 760M and the LX 7G100. The wins counter shows zero for both sides. The LX 7G100 has no individual benchmark scores recorded, so no direct comparison of 3DMark, Geekbench, or Passmark results is possible. The Radeon 760M, however, has a full set of ten recorded benchmark scores. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 400. In Geekbench, it scores 20255 in OpenCL and 30336 in Vulkan. In Passmark, it scores 19 in DirectX 10, 52 in DirectX 11, 25 in DirectX 12, 65 in DirectX 9, 890 in G2D, 5310 in G3D, and 2840 in GPU Compute. Its average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 6019. The nearest rivals to the Radeon 760M, based on average score, are the AMD Radeon RX 6400 at 6001 (0.3% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M at 6000 (0.3% higher), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server at 5996 (0.4% higher), and the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 at 6049 (0.5% lower). These deltas show the Radeon 760M sits within a tight performance band around these four cards, despite being an integrated part. The LX 7G100 has no nearest rivals listed, and its average benchmark score is zero, which places it outside any comparable benchmark grouping. The data indicates the LX 7G100's performance profile is entirely unverified by measured results, while the Radeon 760M's profile is well-documented.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Radeon 760M wins in the domain of measurable, verified benchmark performance. It has ten recorded scores across multiple testing suites, including a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30336 and a Passmark G3D score of 5310. Its average benchmark score of 6019 places it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs in the database, with a nearest-rival group that includes the AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000, showing competitive parity within a few tenths of a percent. For any use case that depends on documented performance data, the Radeon 760M is the only one of the two with evidence of actual capability. It also wins in power efficiency, with a 15 W TDP versus 225 W, and in its integration profile: it is an IGP with no power connectors and no slot width, suitable for compact or low-power systems where a discrete card would not fit or would require a 550 W power supply.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins on raw architectural specifications. It delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32, which is 4.6 times the Radeon 760M's 5.323 TFLOPS. Its FP16 rate of 49.15 TFLOPS is 9.2 times the Radeon 760M's 5.323 TFLOPS. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units versus 512, 192 TMUs versus 32, and 96 ROPs versus 16. Its memory subsystem is fundamentally different: 12 GB of GDDR6 with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, compared to system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The LX 7G100 also has a higher pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s versus 41.58 GPixel/s) and texture rate (384.0 GTexel/s versus 83.17 GTexel/s). It uses a wider PCIe 4.0 x16 interface versus the Radeon 760M's PCIe 4.0 x8. The LX 7G100 also has a higher 50th percentile ranking versus the Radeon 760M's 35th percentile, although this ranking is based on no recorded benchmark scores and an average score of zero. The LX 7G100 wins for workloads that require dedicated, high-bandwidth memory and massive parallel compute throughput, as indicated by its shading unit count and memory bus width. The Radeon 760M wins for any scenario requiring measured, confirmed performance data or minimal power draw.